ruthcity and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.
No offence taken but would rather people debate the content of my posts rather than this general you are only saying it because your negative. My main points about Fsg were lack of investment in the playing side the lack of news on the stadium the priority to cut costs and this current debacle with the Suarez situation. Debate them points tell me why im wrong there.
I still think they borrowed the money to buy Liverpool
Out of interest mate what are you basing that on?
The financial world is based on credit in one way or another and it's not beyond the realms of possibility that maybe an asset was used in a security sense to free up some monies to facilitate the deal.Not as H&G did when they used LFC as a surity for their nefarius dealings, indeed the first doubt and enquiries into their conduct caused their whole commercial sandcastle to blow away.
I looked at how much they had to start with how much debt they have paid off, I also took into account they never paid the share holder a dividend and they have never devalue the shares, I also believe John Henry is far to good a businessman to have £218 million sitting in a bank account Most of the information came from Forbes magazine and the times
John Henry is a very good businessman and I am sure FSG are more than able to cope with there debts
Time will tell. Good will only lasts a certain length. In twelve months time if we are still in the same position in relation to spend stadium and cost cutting dont think there will be as many making excuses for them.
So So predictable from you mate.When you've finished your "half empty" cup of tea.....
Am i not allowed give an opinion without digs. I gave my reasons for my opinion is it to hard to debate them. I dont buy into we have great owners simple as that read above for my reasons ain't going to repeat them
I really love the sugar daddy argument ya id hate our owners buying us Silva and say Mata out of their own money. I ve zero problem people disagreeing with me but what does make me laugh is people saying you only say it because your negative. Really look what ive said nothing but facts there.
It's nothing personal Corbs, but your posts depress me. You've put your spin on facts, no more no less, others have put a positive spin on them, which probably gets your goat. So far FSG have done nothing to harbour such huge resentment, especially as you yourself have stated we're still in a wait and see position.
I'll start being concerned about player investment if we do little business in the summer.Big summer of recruitment coming up for us regardless of whether we finish in the top four or not.
Very good analogy mate with Trinities, one of the factors you mention ie the supporters have always been the side's fiercest critics and apart from the wums and bullshitters this is one case where some positivity can be gleaned from apparent negativity.Long before the wonders of the internet there was always an undercurrent of informed opinion at Anfield which was a living entity and developed as a serial would, eventually the gossip would be confirmed.Unfortunately the aforementioned wums etc get too much limelight on the internet and their bullshit get's a little more credence than it deserves.
Facts we have a net spend of 30 million over 3 transfer windows less than hicks and Gillette first 3 windows. We cut 30 million off the wage bill last summer. Absolutely no sign of a new stadium sorry if these facts seem negative. Posters can hide behind his negative argument all the want doesn't mean what im saying is wrong just a weak argument to get personal on other posters part. Dont think i made any sweeping comments on you rod or az. Sick of people debates with me turning personal because people can't debate the points. Srs the reason i probably havent responded is because ive had to spend most of my time defending myself for having an opinion.