Thats right now back it up with who were the first to annihilate the people of yahquub (jacob)?
Depends which fictional book you read/believe.
Pro-Israeli Lobby Group Made BBC, Sky News ‘Change Narrative’ On StoriesAhead of a widely-expected Israeli-led attack on Iran, Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre, an elitist pro-Israeli lobbying firm, has been caught “briefing” the British mainstream media on how to present news items relating to Israel, bragging in a leaked email of how BBC and Sky News editors “changed their narrative” on stories after meeting with BICOM representatives.http://theintelhub.com/2011/11/07/pro-israeli-lobby-group-made-bbc-sky-news-%E2%80%98change-narrative%E2%80%99-on-stories/
Yes by christians especially in europe.Thats right now back it up with who were the first to annihilate the people of yahquub (jacob)?Back on topic,I think the beating of the chest by israel is in hope that the USA who has armies stationed close by will go in and do the deed on israels part.
All the opinions and politics aside, do you think Iran should be allowed a Nuclear Weapon? Who cares about the same pissant arguments, over and over. Eventually plain logic should be applied to these problems. Its really very simple. Nations that have some semblance of order, stability, control of its citizens, government and a process of checks and balances in its judicial and legislative bodies, should be allowed to pursue some sort of Nuclear program.
but if it comes down to it I dont want Iran to have a Nuke. I dont trust them, I dont trust that government or regime, I dont trust their military. Anyone who thinks that Iran having a nuke will somehow bring stability to the Middle East is either naive or just stupid. Iran cannot have Nuclear Weapons.
they should be allowed nuclear energy for domestic comsumption that is all.
I agree and well said.Out of interest how long have Israel had nuclear weapons?
Totally agree and that is a sentiment echoed by Uncle Tom Cobly and all but apparently your main man in Iran has other ideas.
Some time now, never used and subject to strict and consistent control,
Thought it had been a while.Have they ever used their threat of nuclear weapons against the west?
I've heard that Mossad are advising against a strike on Iran, there is an irony there. The concern of who decides who cab have nuclear weapons/technology rears its head again. India can which is all well and good but states regarded as rogue cannot.
Some time now, never used and subject to strict and consistent control
Regarding Israel's nuclear weapons:What strict controls? They don't even admit to having them so how can strict controls be applied. Israel has never signed the non-proliferation treaty (Iran incidentally has).
This goes from the sublime to the ridiculous Finchie, how can Iran proliferate nuclear weapons when it supposedly has none?There must be an efficient control system in place because there have been no leaks, nuclear accidents or thefts of the materials to construct a nuclear device such as we have seen outside Israel. Of course they have nuclear capability but do not wish to broadcast it, provoke reaction or intimidate people.How can you expect any nation to react to threats of total destruction from regimes on it's very borders?
Treatys / Agreements dont mean jack sh*t when you have a lunatic in control - I asked the Israel question because the usual suspects keep banging on about the right to have them using Israel as an easy way to say "well if they have them Iran should be allowed to have them as well". ..sorry but that is bollocks and an easy argument quoting treatys etc etc saying Israel dont comply.You wouldnt want the local pyscho being given a gun if he has threatened to shoot your face off in the past now would you. . ??
Are you daft? because no one is calling for iran to have nuclear weapons if they have qoute it! iran has a "right" to nuclear energy for domestic consumption not military purposes,yet israel has nukes for military domination in the region.Do some research before banging on about squat.
He's not daft at all and makes perfect sense, as you yourself stated you have reservations about the Iranian teararse who has complete power in that country - no safeguards, no discussion and a religious doctrine that dictates he annihilate anyone that doesn't believe his version of the plot according to whoever, not a candidate for the kill thousands of none believers button operator I would have thought.
No one's losing it Res, admitted there have been previous discussions that have got overheated but this is a reasoned exchange of views with no abuse.I can see where you're coming from mate if you do not have an interest in the subject it could be tiresome reading but it is a theme with many different aspects although it would seem to be repetitious to somebody not too interested in the subject matter.