Yep.
I had quite a few customers come out from it and say how extreme it was.
Watching it myself I didn't think it was overly extreme just what you'd expect from a WW2 film.
Andrew Garfield was impressive in this but I can't quite make up my mind about Vince Vaughan so be interesting to here what you think mate.
Came away a bit disappointed to be honest, and have no idea how this got such a high score on IMDB.
I wouldn't say it was bang average, but if we take Saving Private Ryan (SPR) as the benchmark for modern war films, then Hacksaw Ridge was trailing a fair way behind.
Garfield was OK in the lead, and to be fair it's an excellent story but really could have been done better.
The best I can say about Vaughn is that I've never really rated him, and still don't. A very one dimensional actor.
There was lots of gore, and some pretty heavy action scenes, but it looked fake and had none of the realism of SPR, which I found truly sobering in its realism and intensity.
It seemed to me that Gibson relied on the gore and (badly done) battle scenes to stretch the film out to 140 mins.
If I was scoring this I'd be inclined to be around 6/10 rather than the 8.3/10 on IMDB.
Not a bad film by any means, but not a memorable one for me either.
Logged