The Official: Laugh At Man City Thread

Get a grip.....nothing evangelical about what I said, only making the point that it's stupid to disparage someone because they are wealthy. Wealth is subjective.

Now, you want to fault him for spitting out his dummy over his perceived birthday slight, I'm with you on that, but the issue has nothing to do with whether he has "enough" money or not.

If you are looking for loyalty in football I think you are going to be mostly disappointed.

No you get a grip,greed,in my opinion of course is what causes 99.9% of problems all over the world ,be it commercialism/brands/bankers/shareholders/banks ,whatever it all causes misery so in your opinion it's "subjective"in my opinion like Vulcan expresses above "a disease".

On Topic. If you want to discuss CURRENT AFFAIRS, then there is a board with in LFCREDS.

This is the Man City Thread, not the my dad can fight your dad thread.

On Topic. If you want to discuss CURRENT AFFAIRS, then there is a board with in LFCREDS.

This is the Man City Thread, not the my dad can fight your dad thread.

Not likely! My dad is well hard.

Not likely! My dad is well hard.

Best take his porno's off him then.

WTF are you banging on about?? I am merely pointing out that a already vastly wealthy footballer is again who're ring himself out for another huge wage packet because poor didims didn't get his birthday cake/card/party.

Why you feel the need to go off on a evangelistic tirade about third world countries and the like I will leave to your sainted body and being.

+1.

On Topic. If you want to discuss CURRENT AFFAIRS, then there is a board with in LFCREDS.

This is the Man City Thread, not the my dad can fight your dad thread.

+1.

Memorable dates in Manchester City's Illustrious History:

 1937: Division 1 Title Winners for the first time, under Wilf Wild
 1956: FA Cup Winners under Les McDowall
 1968: Division 1 Title Winners under Joe Mercer
 1969: FA Cup Winners under Joe Mercer
 1983: Yaya Toure is born
 1984: Yaya Toure's 1st Birthday
 1985: Yaya Toure's 2nd Birthday
 1986: Yaya Toure's 3rd Birthday
 1987: Yaya Toure's 4th Birthday
 1988: Yaya Toure's 5th Birthday
 1989: Yaya Toure's 6th Birthday
 1990: Yaya Toure's 7th Birthday
 1991: Yaya Toure's 8th Birthday
 1992: Yaya Toure's 9th Birthday
 1993: Yaya Toure's 10th Birthday
 1994: Yaya Toure's 11th Birthday
 1995: Yaya Toure's 12th Birthday
 1996: Yaya Toure's 13th Birthday
 1997: Yaya Toure's 14th Birthday
 1998: Yaya Toure's 15th Birthday
 1999: Yaya Toure's 16th Birthday
 2000: Yaya Toure's 17th Birthday
 2001: Yaya Toure's 18th Birthday
 2002: Yaya Toure's 19th Birthday
 2003: Yaya Toure's 20th Birthday
 2004: Yaya Toure's 21st Birthday
 2005: Yaya Toure's 22nd Birthday
 2006: Yaya Toure's 23rd Birthday
 2007: Yaya Toure's 24th Birthday
 2008: Yaya Toure's 25th Birthday
 2009: Yaya Toure's 26th Birthday
 2010: Yaya Toure's 27th Birthday
 2011: Yaya Toure's 28th Birthday; FA Cup Winners under Roberto Mancini
 2012: Yaya Toure's 29th Birthday; Premier League Champions under Roberto Mancini
 2013: Yaya Toure's 30th Birthday
 2014: Yaya Toure's 31st Birthday; Premier League Champions under Manuel Pellegrini

Shamelessly ripped from sickipedia !

Just seen that although they've had their player squads reduced to 21 from 25 for Champ League FIFA have also reduced their requirements for 8 homegrown players to 5. Hardly seems like much of a punishment.

Just seen that although they've had their player squads reduced to 21 from 25 for Champ League FIFA have also reduced their requirements for 8 homegrown players to 5. Hardly seems like much of a punishment.

Especially considering they'd have had less than 25 to make up for the lack of homegrown players anyway it's not a punishment at all.

Why the F**k are FIFA sticking their nose into UEFA business?

They shouldn't be having any say in UEFA's FFP ruling. God I hate FIFA.

Anyone else think it's dodgy that Man City are trying to use their New york team as a way to get Lampard playing for them?
Heard it tonight and was like errrrrr dodgy way of doing business.
Surely this isn't right is it? Not that I'm worried about lardy pants, just the legality of it or ethics.
He went to a foreign team and now might end up back here, would Chelsea have been ok if that was the deal in the first place?

He was out of contract and thus entitled to go wherever he liked. It's more likely that someone used the bargaining chip of a loan to Citeh to get him to sign for New York.

Fishy, dodgy, whateveryou may wish to call it, but legal, and very clever.

He was out of contract and thus entitled to go wherever he liked. It's more likely that someone used the bargaining chip of a loan to Citeh to get him to sign for New York.

Fair enough, good point... still it's insider trading or something?

Anyone else think it's dodgy that Man City are trying to use their New york team as a way to get Lampard playing for them?

I don't think chelsea would've been arsed, he was out of contract and could've gone any where he wanted.

Regardless of where lard arse ends up they're dodgy anyway what with their incestuous financial support and sh*t.

It's weird. As if he's going to get a game there the fat blurt. Thought NY was perfect for him at this stage.

Weird career decision.

How's he gonna get a game at city . Strange but am sure it's money based as most things are now

An Home grown player to add to the Champions League squad.

An Home grown player to add to the Champions League squad.

Bingus! Plus Lampard should still be able to chip in for them off the bench. Still in pretty good shape for a guy his age.

Bingus! Plus Lampard should still be able to chip in for them off the bench. Still in pretty good shape for a guy his age.

He's only back so he can carry on drilling Adrian Chiles sloppy seconds!!

Btw here's his welcoming by the mancs

So Fat Frank could be going to City, so much for saying he couldn't play for another Premier League team.

So Fat Frank could be going to City, so much for saying he couldn't play for another Premier League team.

Could!! Already has mate.

Could!! Already has mate.

Oh, I thought it was just rumours at the moment. Another beaut to have gone back on his word then.