General LFC Transfer rumours/gossip thread

Pep is getting rid of Hart because he wants a ball playing keeper, exactly the reason we signed Karius and people think we should get Hart.

Hilarious.

Pep is getting rid of Hart because he wants a ball playing keeper, exactly the reason we signed Karius and people think we should get Hart.

Hilarious.

I thought we signed Karius because Mignolet is dog sh*t?

read the thread title.

I have.
Klopp has stated that he has the money if he wants to spend it, but because he hasn't, you stated that "we have no ambition".

So by inference, you think Klopp has no ambition, because he has full control over transfers.
Nice to see you getting behind the manager again.

we don't seem to have much ambition do we. Why didn't we put in a sneaky bid for Neuer they could only say no. I would take Hart over Mignolet in a "hart" beat.

Neuer 

Would you take Hart over Karius? He is the new saviour come to take us away from the (albeit terrible, flapping) clutches of Mignolet.

Why everyone is getting their dicks hard for Hart is beyond me. He isn't much better than Mignolet, why would Pep be selling him otherwise?

why would Pep be selling him otherwise?

Doesn't fancy him. Doesn't mean he's not good.
He's got a couple of prem winners medals in his back pocket, and imo a side can't win a PL without a good keeper.

Doesn't fancy him. Doesn't mean he's not good.
He's got a couple of prem winners medals in his back pocket, and imo a side can't win a PL without a good keeper.

& Jimmy Traore has a Champions League medal & Michael Owen has a premier league medal,should we sign them ?

& Jimmy Traore has a Champions League medal & Michael Owen has a premier league medal,should we sign them ?

Well we need a left back and a striker, but I doubt we would be interested in those two as they are over 24.

Pep is getting rid of Hart because he wants a ball playing keeper, exactly the reason we signed Karius and people think we should get Hart.

Hilarious.

This, all day long.

Whilst Hart is a better keeper than Migs, he is essentially the same type of keeper, so no thanks.

Pep is getting rid of Hart because he wants a ball playing keeper, exactly the reason we signed Karius and people think we should get Hart.

Hilarious.

The fact that people are clamouring to sign Hart without seeing Karius play one competitive minute for us is baffling. I said in the Spurs pre match thread that it is no coincidence that both Karius (new first choice keeper) and Matip (new first choice center half) both have very high starting positions, pushing us as a team further up the pitch. Whilst Hart might be a slight upgrade on Mignolet, he is getting shot from City because he can't play with the ball at his feet, and it is clear we are looking to play out from the back. A move that makes no sense is just everyone hitting the panic button.

Maybe this is one downside to getting business done early, everyone forgets we've brought in seven players already and just want transfers for the sake of them.

I think Hart is better than Mignolet too mate, but considering that this time last year everyone was convinced Bogdan was better than Mignolet, that's not really saying too much.

Is Hart the best we can get, is maybe a better question.

Probably, for the money FSG are willing to spend... I feel as if it is one of those time when the chance of signing a player we would not normally have a chance to that we must take it regardless of how many goal keepers we already have on the books, it is too much of a good signing to pass up

Why everyone is getting their dicks hard for Hart is beyond me. He isn't much better than Mignolet, why would Pep be selling him otherwise?

But that is the point, whether it be a little better or slight better, he is still an improvement and that improvement could be the difference between Europa League football and Champions League football next season...

Probably, for the money FSG are willing to spend... I feel as if it is one of those time when the chance of signing a player we would not normally have a chance to that we must take it regardless of how many goal keepers we already have on the books, it is too much of a good signing to pass up

There is not a cat in hell's chance FSG would pay Joe Hart 150k a week on top of the ridiculous transfer fee that City would ask for. He's also average as F**k.

But that is the point, whether it be a little better or slight better, he is still an improvement and that improvement could be the difference between Europa League football and Champions League football next season...

You do realise Karius is our number one keeper, right?

The fact that people are clamouring to sign Hart without seeing Karius play one competitive minute for us is baffling.

It is not about preferring hart over Karius... It is about Hart vs Mignolet...

Probably, for the money FSG are willing to spend... I feel as if it is one of those time when the chance of signing a player we would not normally have a chance to that we must take it regardless of how many goal keepers we already have on the books, it is too much of a good signing to pass up

I know how you feel mate, I felt similarly about Gotze.

There is not a cat in hell's chance FSG would pay Joe Hart 150k a week on top of the ridiculous transfer fee that City would ask for. He's also average as f**k.

And Mignolet is above average???... As for the £150K a week I believe that he is willing to take a pay cut, and If not we have spent £600K in the transfer market so £150k is really f*^k all

You do realise Karius is our number one keeper, right?

And If Hart was to prove better than Karius where is the problem?... But as i said it is about getting a second place option that is better than Mignolet

And If Hart was to prove better than Karius where is the problem?... But as i said it is about getting a second place option that is better than Mignolet

You think Hart would even contemplate coming without a guarantee he'd be number 1?

Course he wouldn't and Jürgen wouldn't give him it either.

Also he's not that good a keeper anyway.

Hart is being let go because he does not fit the philosophy of football Guardiola demands, Klopp demands the same philosophy from his keepers...

http://www.101greatgoals.com/news/liverpool-have-no-interest-in-signing-manchester-citys-joe-hart-echo/

http://www.clickliverpool.com/sport/liverpool-fc/liverpool-fc-transfers/7535-brendan-rodgers-urges-liverpool-fc-to-sign-joe-hart/

It is not about preferring hart over Karius... It is about Hart vs Mignolet...

So we should start Karius and buy Hart to sit on the bench and put him in the same situation that is the reason he is leaving city?

Solid logic.

http://www.101greatgoals.com/news/liverpool-have-no-interest-in-signing-manchester-citys-joe-hart-echo/

http://www.clickliverpool.com/sport/liverpool-fc/liverpool-fc-transfers/7535-brendan-rodgers-urges-liverpool-fc-to-sign-joe-hart/

Yeah, nice recommendation Brendan: "He's a good friend of Milly's"

Considering he bought Bogdan and Mignolet I don't think we'd be wise listening to the sagely advice of old Brendan there.

So we should start Karius and buy Hart to sit on the bench and put him in the same situation that is the reason he is leaving city?

Solid logic.

Who knows if Karius or Mignolet is our first choice ?