We all want to see Sturridge back and firing, but the fact is none of us has a clue about the lad's injury, it's effect or how it might restrict him.
Klopp's words are being interpreted differently by different people, they're completely non-committal, and no-one really knows what he's thinking either.
A lot of this seems to stem from the anecdote in Stevie G's book about him persuading Daniel to play when the lad was reluctant. So now we're experts on the lad's character (or lack of)?
Comparisons with Gerry Byrne (in spite of his heroic efforts in '65) seem irrelevant - different sort of injury (he could still run, pass, cross, shoot albeit in pain), different era (no subs, small squads, players not the massive financial assets they are now), different levels of athleticicsm expected, end of the season, none of the current focus on performance levels.
Also, if you were Klopp, would you risk picking your top striker against his wishes when he has a foot injury in a Prem game against Swansea at this point in the season, when Benteke is firing and Firmino's just helped destroy CFC and MCFC? I wouldn't.
The only person who knows whether D Sturridge is fit and capable of playing to the standard he needs to at any point in time is D.Sturridge. Even the medical staff will be basing a huge degree of their decision-making on what D Sturridge tells them about how he feels.
Maybe the lad does have a genuine concern about coming back when not fully fit. I would have, too, given what he's been through.
This is the kid whose goals helped take us to the brink of the title 18 months ago. Get him back when he's good and ready and he might just do it again.
Some of us on here have short memories.
Logged