Mate, agreed that a game changer would be nice, but making a 40 mil signing does not guarantee a game changer. Ozil is an example (though I do recognize not every big signing is Ozil). So its about balancing risk too. Sometimes banking on one of two 20 mil signings being the next big thing is a safer bet.
For those concerned, and think we need a big signing, we have time and we have money, so just chill. And the big signing may not come in the area of the park which was left empty by our last big name.
On topic; Remy is not a game changer, but if he scores at the same rate as he did last season (14 goals in 24 starts), then he is very good business. Plus he fits the model, bloody fast, versatile forward.
It is all about identifying value. If you value Ozil at 40M then that is the most you will spend on them. Different teams have different values on players. Rodgers has a different value on Moreno which caused the deal to stall. He would have to overspend on his value to get him. No team is going to throw away 40M on a player if they did not think he was world class and would improve their lineup, unless you literally are just spending money to make sure your opponents do not get that player.
My whole argument is you get a better talent and productivity out of a player who you spend 40M on than 20M. If you get more productivity out of a 20M player then that players price would increase to 40M. Its economics. It is not difficult. You can not always find those bargain buys that you get for less than 10M and turn themselves into a 40M player. That has incredible risk and sometimes you have to spend a bit more to get that extra quality.
Getting 2 20M players would mean one sits on the bench and you are paying higher wages for someone to sit on the bench. Like I said I think our depth is good right now with the players we have brought in and are close to signing. We need that quality now.
I am chill, I know we have a whole month to do business. I am not calling for a big name signing right now.
If you have 40M to spend and you have multiple holes in your lineup then yes 2 players for 20M is better as you get 2 players who will improve you right away. But I think LFC is at the points where we need 1 for 40M instead of 2 for 20M. Quality over quantity fellas.
Logged