Trending Topics

      Next match: Fulham v LFC [Premier League] Sun 21st Apr @ 4:30 pm
      Craven Cottage

      Today is the 19th of April and on this date LFC's match record is P32 W19 D8 L5

      Blast from the Past (April 2003)

      Read 1766 times
      0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
      JD
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 39,595 posts | 6928 
      Blast from the Past (April 2003)
      Jun 11, 2014 11:58:37 am
      Caught my eye this morning - thought this was well worthy of a re-read.

      With all the criticism of Brazil only just getting stadiums finished - I thought it worthy of re-highlighting just how badly run our club has been off the field.

      And yes - this was Rick Parry speaking ELEVEN years ago.

      Rick Parry - New Stadium latest
      16th April 2003

      When is the planning application going in for the new stadium? When might building start? When will it finish? Rick Parry has all the answers in part three of our exclusive interview

      Liverpoolfc.tv: When will planning application go in for the new Stadium? When might building work start and when will it be completed?

      Rick Parry: The planning application will be going in towards the middle of the year. There's a tremendous amount of work going on at the moment with our professional team, who are pulling all the detailed plans together. It's getting very exciting now the way things are taking shape.

      Interestingly, a lot of the work now is centring on the surrounds of the stadium such as the re-use of the existing site, the re-use of the parkland, all of which will be taken into account by the city when they consider the planning application. They won't just be looking at the stadium itself.

      We hope the planning application will be turned around relatively quickly, within just over three months, so it's perfectly feasible to say the building of the ground could start before the end of this calendar year.

      Our big hope is that the planning application doesn't get called in by the government because that could add a year to the process and be a significant delay.

      You're looking at somewhere around two years to build the stadium so, realistically, it'll be sometime in the second half of 2005 or early 2006 by the time it's finished.

      What other obstacles are there to overcome before the new Stadium is given the go-ahead?

      There's a lot still to be done. We have to make sure we have the money to build it which is one of the major challenges, and more importantly making sure we can afford the repayments because we've always said we don't want to land ourselves with a white elephant. The only reason we're doing this is to generate more revenue so we can then plough more money back into the team. Financial advisors are on board now and are making sure that the plans are sound.

      There's still a lot to do but ever since we got the positive vote from the local community that a clear majority of residents are in favour, everything has felt a lot more positive. The council has been very supportive and the mood locally, by and large, has been 'lets get on with it'. It's very exciting.

      Is there any chance we might still stay at Anfield?

      Because the new stadium is complex and because there's still a lot to do, it would be silly to say there is absolutely zero chance. The problem has always been that if we stay here we won't be progressing because the chances of a significant expansion on this site are extremely slim.

      We took the decision that moving forward with a capacity of 46,000 is not enough. We're also conscious that in the relatively near future the Main Stand would have to be rebuilt because it's old. Given the safety standards we have to abide by, the irony is if we rebuilt the Main Stand we'd end up with a lower capacity than we have at the moment, so that'd mean we'd be going backwards.

      Doing nothing is not an option and in our evaluation the new stadium is going to be a more efficient way forward. Emotionally, of course, we wanted to stay at Anfield but the next best thing is we're staying in Anfield and we're certainly paying a lot of attention to making sure we've got a link between the old and the new. We're not going to be very far away. We're more than conscious of the significance of the Hillsborough Memorial, the ashes scattered on the pitch here, the Shankly Gates etc and the exciting task is making sure all of those are blended into the new stadium so we have a transition from old to new.

      How far have we got in those 11 years?

      « Last Edit: Jun 16, 2014 11:59:59 am by JD »
      CRK
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 13,604 posts | 361 
      • JFT96 YNWA
      Re: Blast from the Post (April 2003)
      Reply #1: Jun 14, 2014 08:33:30 am
      Amazing reading back on that. Especially when you see dates like 2005/2006 being bandied about.

      That bowl looked sh*te anyway. Looked a step up from the Reebok and a step below The Emirates.
      LFCexiled
      • Guest
      Re: Blast from the Post (April 2003)
      Reply #2: Jun 14, 2014 09:32:47 am
      We're also conscious that in the relatively near future the Main Stand would have to be rebuilt because it's old. Given the safety standards we have to abide by, the irony is if we rebuilt the Main Stand we'd end up with a lower capacity than we have at the moment, so that'd mean we'd be going backwards.

      Doing nothing is not an option and in our evaluation the new stadium is going to be a more efficient way forward.

      Genius.

      Hindsight.

      srslfc
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 32,145 posts | 4897 
      Re: Blast from the Post (April 2003)
      Reply #3: Jun 14, 2014 10:09:30 am
      Amazing reading back on that. Especially when you see dates like 2005/2006 being bandied about.

      That bowl looked sh*te anyway. Looked a step up from the Reebok and a step below The Emirates.

      One small crumb of comfort about things taking so long is we didn't end up in that bowl.

      It was F***ing terrible.
      what-a-hit-son
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 16,475 posts | 4821 
      • t: @MrPrice1979 i: @klmprice101518
      Re: Blast from the Post (April 2003)
      Reply #4: Jun 14, 2014 08:15:02 pm
      Was a bit of a beaut wasn't he?

      Remember when the club shops were shut the day after we won the Champions League because he took every single member of the LFC staff over there? Or something like that.
      AmericanPlant
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,248 posts | 170 
      Re: Blast from the Post (April 2003)
      Reply #5: Jun 16, 2014 09:32:01 am
      I think it was good that all the staff were taken over to Istanbul.

      And one of his classics was running out of CL winners shirts.
      They couldnt even produce them themselves without Reebok agreeing.

      Still, atleast we were a football club in those days. Not a "corporate saccer brand".

      Some people can go on about Fenway, but they've managed some massive ballsups, and breathtaking arrogance since owning the club/"brand" as they call it.
      what-a-hit-son
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 16,475 posts | 4821 
      • t: @MrPrice1979 i: @klmprice101518
      Re: Blast from the Past (April 2003)
      Reply #6: Jun 16, 2014 08:22:43 pm
      I think it was good that all the staff were taken over to Istanbul.

      How when it meant nobody could by a shirt the day after?

      AmericanPlant
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,248 posts | 170 
      Re: Blast from the Past (April 2003)
      Reply #7: Jun 19, 2014 11:49:26 am
      How when it meant nobody could by a shirt the day after?

      Well if you have to ask the question, you'll probably never understand the answer..
      Tom ;)

      But seriously:-
      1)The dozy club ran out of CL shirts and Reebok wouldn't produce any more.
      2)More importantly, the idea that the club paid for all the staff to go to Istanbul was massively commended around the footballing world. Not just slippery corporate buggers like Ian Ayre, but the turnstile staff, the bog cleaners, concourse sweepers. The people Shanks and Paisley would remind us were important like anyone else. The sort Jenny Chang and co wouldn't give the steam off his piss to. It was a symbol of what we WERE ie a big family, a club not a brand or corporation. That values and identity are infinitely more important than the last ounce of squeeze dried profit.

      The new lot couldn't even get George Sephton a ticket for the cup final.

      You couldn't have waited 24 hrs or so?

      Quick Reply