Nothing serious mate, I just thought BR tried to put player(s) on the field hoping they have some good performance that might impress the clubs those interest to buy them (Napoli for Lucas and Sunderland for Borini etc.)
If so it's a gamble (and I also not take it seriously anyway ), but if not why started him ?
As strange as it may sound, I don't think he had many choices.
If you look at our bench yesterday we only had Can and Allen as options. If, like me, you believe Can has a slight knock then starting him wouldn't have been an option. So then Allen is the only alternative, as much as Lucas/Gerrard/Henderson may not have worked, we've also seen Gerrard/Allen/Henderson not work at all and many of us called for that trio never to start together. There's also the fact that Allen has more of an impact offensively than Lucas does, for instance if we were losing the game you'd never want to have Lucas as your impact sub so Brendan may have go along the logic of start Lucas, hope for a lead but if things aren't going our way then we have Allen.
Sure we could have started 2 in midfield but that most certainly would have been a recipe for disaster. Without Markovic/Lallana our options were limited to our most defensive minded 4 in midfield and it showed. I've no problem with it personally and don't see Brendan starting with that trio again when he has options but while we have £45m worth of talent injured and £10m carrying a knock at least we had a team capable of beating Southampton at home, a result already better than last year.
With regards Lucas, I thought he did pretty well in the first half but in the 2nd half he had a complete nightmare and was rightly subbed.
Logged