I've always faced reality.
An apologist does not face reallity by definition, they circumvent actuality by presenting their own faulted version of events.
Just because I don't carry or subscribe to the level of hatred that you do, simply because they sacked KK, it doesn't make my overall view any less valid.
In fact, if you'd ever bothered to see past your myopic and borderline pathological hatred for FSG (simply because they sacked KK), you'd see this has been pretty much my position from day one.
As described above this is your interpretation no more no less, sacking Dalglish was as faulted as any of the decisions foisted on us by FSG, you like others of your ilk always use this example as a tool to dismiss criticism of FSG.
There are no rabid, manic accusations at play but serious discontent at the owners perceived inability to conduct the affairs of LFC.
Apart from that, what the F**k is the clubs "demeanour" supposed to mean?
Demeanour is the appearence or condition as it appears to an observer, in the context used it is perfectly acceptable.
Really did think you were better than that, still woppers do sneak under the net occasionally.
NB If you would like me to write in larger text or explain any more words to you please ask.
« Last Edit: Aug 28, 2013 11:44:40 am by stuey »
Logged