The FA

1 rule for one and 1 rule for another ie terry its a shame

The is no way a court will find Terry guilty with so much hearsay, giving the FAA the perfect excuse to let Terry off scott free

If the case against Terry was based on hearsay it would not be allowed to proceed to the High Court.

If the case against Terry was based on hearsay it would not be allowed to proceed to the High Court.

Yup, he's having his swansong as we speak. He's fu**ed. The unfortunate by product of his court case is Luis will get dragged through the mud all over again.

This thread makes me very angry - I F***ing hate The FA.

Yup, he's having his swansong as we speak. He's fu**ed. The unfortunate by product of his court case is Luis will get dragged through the mud all over again.

Could be a blessing in disguise mate, if the Luis/liar Evra case were used as a reference point the injustice and the bullshit element would scream out. Personally I would not envisage his council using the case for any reason whatever.

Could be a blessing in disguise mate, if the Luis/liar Evra case were used as a reference point the injustice and the bullshit element would scream out. Personally I would not envisage his council using the case for any reason whatever.

As a post script to the above I neglected to point out that as the Suarez/liar Evra case was based purely on hearsay any refence to it in HM High Court would be inadmissible evidence.