You're debating with yourself kid.
He is a good player, but over a season nowhere good enough for Liverpool.
That said, unlike some players we've had, I've always had the impression that he plays "balls to the metal" to the limit of his abilities and gives 100% of what he has to offer.
The lesson here kid is to judge (if you feel you're in a position to?!) over a broad spectrum of a poster's offerings.....not just the last two you find.
Over and out.......hope you didn't sweat too much on that response......it's only football.
I think the problem is just confusion from what you really meant in your last post mate (you won´t make me call you "kid" back
).I asked you a straightforward question: "Do you think he was just good for Swansea and not good enough for us?".I suppose you answered in the positive by saying he is a good player but not good enough for Liverpool.So we have that.Then you say you think he has always given his all with us while thinking "from day one" that the shirt was too heavy for him.So either for you the shirt being heavy does not relate to workrate or desire just quality,fair enough,or from one post to the next you didn´t think the shirt was heavy anymore.
My whole point is that you went from killing the lad in one post,where you specifically said that from day one you always thought the shirt was too heavy for him (which implies a timeline from the moment he first started playing for us to the moment you posted that,which renders past posts about him after he wore red unnecesary to read to get your assesment of him unless you lied there) to saying you´ve always thought the lad´s a good player,without clarifying that he´s not good enough for Liverpool,like you just specifically said now.Again,try reading those 2 posts as if someone else had written them.
So now,apparently,the issue is clear.I take back my judgement of fickleness (yes,I will always feel the need to judge fickleness harshly,and yes,I can be wrong) and chalk it up to confusion.Didn´t sweat too much on these responses as they are just logical conclusions and reasonable questions stated in an objective manner to a perceived issue.Issue apparently was nonexistent but I always enjoy a nice objective argument (not fight).Peace mate
Logged