I really want to be patient, I completely agree that chopping and changing mangers is counterproductive and will not bring success, unless ofcourse we happen to pick a diamond, and maybe this is why some want to give BR 2-3 years.
The thing is if, as I do, you are convinced that BR is out of his depth, quite frankly amatuerish at times and we are falling further behind, then why should we give him lots of time? It will hurt my club, top players will leave to be replaced by the best of Swansea, he doesn't have the calibre to recruit the very best players, the 'men' he now wants. Even those who are trying to convince themselves he is a top manger, let's be honest, if you could go back to June would you still pick Brendan over any of the viable candidates? I don't expect honest answers here, but consider it offline.
We all seem to agree that FSG are pretty naieve on football soccer matters, so why the faith in their decision on appointing Brendan, at the very least he can and should be examined critically.
IMHO I still think this sqaud is talented enough to have got into the top four, and has been poorly organised, the only problem with changing / removing Brendan sooner or later will be who the fck will FSG appoint next? If any club needs a qualified DOF it's us.
« Last Edit: Feb 16, 2013 11:10:56 pm by Redtrader »
Logged