Hold the phone Feds, he's f**king 16 yrs old and you're writing him off! Messi was 16 at one stage, who knew he'd turn out the way he has.
No one is writing him off, F***ing hell I never even heard of the lad 48 hours again, let alone seen him play. I have no idea who he is. But he's 16, and is going to be going straight into the Academy. That much we know.
And yet, the priority even before Suarez started to want out was to strengthen the starting XI. If (and it's a big if) we are able to get the targets we want for the starting XI, then we need to look at upgrading the bench. If there is any money left after that, then okay, let's work on bringing some youth talent in for the Academy.
But it seems like we're doing it at random instead of in terms of priorities. I mean, this kid, no one knows how he's going to turn out. He could be a great player. Or he could be a dud like Pacheco.
And yet, we have a player in Luis Suarez who we know EXACTLY what he can do. He has proven it, again and again and again. In order to keep him here we have to show him that we are ambitious and are going to provide him with a chance to win NOW, during the peak of his career. Why are we spending the little money we have on players that aren't going to be able to contribute to the first team for another 3-4 years at least, when we have a handful of players who we know can contribute now?
The priorities should not be kids. Brian said it perfectly up above; strengthen the first XI and then use what's left over on kids if you have to. But making kids the priority is going to end up setting us back even further, because our top players are going to see that we're not focused on the present, only the future, so they'll leave to go find a club that shows they want to win NOW, not just in ten years. Then, those kids we bought for the future suddenly are all we have left, because we put more energy into them (a big risk) than into the players who we know can contribute now.
Logged