I'm not suggesting the owners don't have anything to be criticized for, but it isn't their fault that Brendan spent basically all of the Suarez money on Lallana, Lovren, and Lambert. These 3 were quite clearly players BR had identified as prime targets, and we got them all even though we had to overpay for 2 of them. The owners did what they are supposed to do - they signed the checks so BR was able to get the players he wanted. It's not their fault that none of them justified the money spent on them.....
Why was it the Suarez money that was spent on those three?
Suarez was still here when Lambert was purchased so none of the Suarez money went towards his purchase. And I'd be willing to bet Lovren and Lallana were already on their way as well.
So no, in my eyes it's not Brendan's fault that he got the targets he wanted BEFORE he had to deal with a striker crisis. One that should have been partially addressed by getting Sanchez (or another like styled/skilled target).
Instead, for whatever reason you choose to believe (London over Liverpool, more wages over less wages, Wenger over Rodgers) Sanchez didn't come and we did nothing to address the issue after that.
In my mind, once Sanchez was gone, the committee got tired of trying and just threw their hands up and told Rodgers it was Balotelli or nothing.
Logged