'The future is in the past' is perhaps an old adage by which Liverpool fans are criticised for believing in too literally at times. And I do think there is an unrealistic tendency by some to call upon legends from the past to 'save the club' by coming in to manage us. Our past history should be inspiration, but we should never be constrained by it. When we do that, we are in danger of pigeon-holing what IS Liverpool, and what ISN'T Liverpool.
For example, I realise that many would want Rafa and Kenny back as manager, but in all seriousness, their moment has passed. And being brutally honest, unless I see ample evidence of genuine coaching quality and experience from Gerrard and Carragher, I don't want them anywhere near the managerial role, and no amount of sentiment will change my stance on that.
More relevant to the argument however, I was as gutted as anyone at the time that both Rafa and Kenny were sacked, but I wouldn't go back to them to drive us forward. But there is always inspiration and proof of the qualities in teams of the past that is deeply engrained in Liverpool supporters subconscience, such as the winning mentality that is derived from the hard work, intelligence, fearlessness and sheer ruthless leadership from ex-players and managers. And I think the Champions League 2005 and the men who contributed to that epitomises the mental characteristics by which Liverpool need to succeed. And so timely reminders refresh our minds and instil in a younger generation of what is required.
I believe our future and the success we desire is in men with these charecteristics who aren't connected to the club in anyway but will, in their own time, become legends. Our priorities should be focused on finding and making those legends, not relying on old ones.
« Last Edit: May 30, 2015 03:26:36 am by Son Of A Gun »
Logged