Firstly, I don't think a lot of the transfer committee signings were ever given a proper chance under Rodgers. I think they're much better than they were made to look and Emre Can, Sakho, Moreno, etc. are all good examples of this. Secondly, I think Klopp will have much more influence on the transfer committee. Thirdly, I think Klopp and the transfer committee will work in tandem rather than act as opposing forces which is what it felt like at times under Rodgers.
Thanks for the reply Barney - definitely food for thought there and I'm pretty much in agreement with all you've 'said'.
There was (
to my mind anyhow) a definite rift between what the Committee provided and what Brendan wanted. That rift highlighted by the fact Brendan didn't play [give "a proper chance"] quite a few new signings as much as he could have - the thought I suppose being 'if I didn't want them, why should I play them' - although to be fair; all managers, JĆ¼rgen included, do exactly the same thing. I totally agree however that they definitely appeared to be "opposing forces".
But is that the fault of 'the committee' or the manager Barney? Should he have trusted them more or should they have listened to him more? I don't know mate - although I do know who (without them giving the subject much thought) people will blame.
. Think of it like this...
It could be argued that, by doing just that [refusing to start players], Brendan Rodgers was trying to have more influence on transfers and the committee - something you say, in your second point, JĆ¼rgen
will have. So, while I agree that he may have more influence, I'm just not sure how it will manifest itself...
It would be nice to think that JĆ¼rgen has
"first call" on players [something, I suppose, Brendan Rodgers wanted] because, let's face it -
"last call" is F***ing irrelevant without it. However...
Ayre is adamant that the Committee will operate
just as it did before; with, just as he did before, the manager [now JĆ¼rgen] having the "final say". Here's how that read:
Ayre continued to explain, this is a forward-thinking, modern approach to recruitment.
āThereās only one person that has the final say over what players [we sign] at Liverpool Football Club and thatās JĆ¼rgen Klopp right now,ā ... āThatās always been the case for as long as Iāve been here.ā
āThe point that has been made about the committee, and I donāt think we did anything any different to most football clubs, is that
the manager will say we are looking for somebody in this position and a bunch of people ā a mix of traditional scouts and more recently analytical and digital-based information ā bring all of that together as was always the case,ā he said.
āThen
we look at two, three, four players, the best players for that position, show them to the manager and the manager can go watch or have the scouts go
watch those players and narrow it down.
ā
At that point Iāll become more involved and start talking to clubs, agents, players on a negotiations basis and then the manager will choose.ā
http://www.thisisanfield.com/2015/11/JĆ¼rgen-klopp-has-final-say-despite-liverpools-transfer-committee-approach-ian-ayre/
I've read that a few times now and cutting to the chase - it's clear that the manager's "final say" is on a very limited selection, picked for him by scouts and program analysts ... Aye is convinced "thatās always been the case".
The point I'm trying to make is: If the ["last call"] status quo remains - JĆ¼rgen might, very well, find himself at loggerheads with the Committee - just as Brendan did.
Finally, one last thing - JĆ¼rgen initially made a point that 'development is working with what you have'. After, very nearly, one full season of working with and 'developing' the transfer committee's players; it will be interesting to see how he rates the players and therefore the committee's record, to date.
The Summer window will be interesting.