Trending Topics

      Next match: v [] Thu 1st Jan @ 1:00 am

      Today is the 24th of May and on this date LFC's match record is P14 W9 D1 L4

      LFC Reds Poll

      Q. Are LFC genuinely interested?

      Yes we are ready to go head to head to sign him
      49 (44.1%)
      No, it's PR spin
      62 (55.9%)

      Total Members Voted: 109

      Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)

      Read 267793 times
      0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
      Ribapuru
      • Banned
      • *****

      • 10,843 posts | 1371 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #621: Jun 07, 2017 06:52:28 pm
      Klopp
      mcarz
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 17,179 posts | 1355 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #622: Jun 07, 2017 06:54:01 pm
      Amateur hour yet again. F**k the apology too! Southampton do that sh*t all the time.

      Also, by apologising we could open ourselves up to all sorts of punishment from the FA.
      what-a-hit-son
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 16,506 posts | 4850 
      • t: @MrPrice1979 i: @klmprice101518
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #623: Jun 07, 2017 06:54:50 pm
      wellbuilt
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,154 posts | 138 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #624: Jun 07, 2017 06:54:57 pm
      Even now tha Ian Ayre has gone we still have ways of conducting ourselves as complete dimwits


      Something is rotten at the club
      Ribapuru
      • Banned
      • *****

      • 10,843 posts | 1371 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #625: Jun 07, 2017 06:55:37 pm
      I reckon somebody probably already started on one of them ww2 videos with the shouting and subtitles.
      7-King Kenny-7
      • Lives on Sesame Street
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 44,014 posts | 5760 
      • You'll Never Walk Alone!
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #626: Jun 07, 2017 06:55:59 pm
      What a complete and utter embarrassment.
      Ribapuru
      • Banned
      • *****

      • 10,843 posts | 1371 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #627: Jun 07, 2017 06:58:00 pm
      Klopp has to be held accountable for this one, not the club.
      MarkMitt
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 2,800 posts | 337 
      • Give it your best every time!
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #628: Jun 07, 2017 06:59:09 pm
      Wow! COLLOSSAL F**k up here. Every team will be laughing at us for sure and taking us to the cleaners with transfers. As far as I'm concerned this is a new low point.
      brilad
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,967 posts | 99 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #629: Jun 07, 2017 07:00:01 pm
      Diego LFC
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 19,333 posts | 2834 
      • Sempre Liverpool
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #630: Jun 07, 2017 07:01:44 pm
      Klopp has to be held accountable for this one, not the club.

      Do you ever make sense at all? Klopp is an employee and key representative of the club
      Ribapuru
      • Banned
      • *****

      • 10,843 posts | 1371 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #631: Jun 07, 2017 07:01:53 pm
      Worse than Suarez bite since it is from manager. Awaiting full transfer ban  :(
      7-King Kenny-7
      • Lives on Sesame Street
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 44,014 posts | 5760 
      • You'll Never Walk Alone!
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #632: Jun 07, 2017 07:01:54 pm
      Gone from our main target wanting to join us and also Salah close to being done to both deals being monumentally fu**ed up :lmao:

      This club and big transfers just don't match.

      Unless it's a way to get Saints back on side and dancing to their tune and this is part of it?...
      Pippen
      • Forum Emlyn Hughes
      • ****

      • 692 posts | 46 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #633: Jun 07, 2017 07:02:07 pm
      Can somebody give a short summary of what went wrong and who's to blame? Because obviosuly we have ended our interest in v. Dijk. He seemed our premium target for the upcoming season. Just confused.
      mcarz
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 17,179 posts | 1355 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #634: Jun 07, 2017 07:02:44 pm
      Even now tha Ian Ayre has gone we still have ways of conducting ourselves as complete dimwits


      Something is rotten at the club

      Yeah, the people running it.
      Diego LFC
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 19,333 posts | 2834 
      • Sempre Liverpool
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #635: Jun 07, 2017 07:05:04 pm
      Not really, he has five years on his contract. So Southampton can do whatever they want if they want. And yes contract these days do matter if the club is willing to force their hand.

      When it comes to amounts close to 50m though, Saints could really use that money. It would be different if we talking about Madrid or United. I dont think Southampton seriously expected him to stay for the six years of that contract, more of a way of strenghtening their position in a negotiation
      7-King Kenny-7
      • Lives on Sesame Street
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 44,014 posts | 5760 
      • You'll Never Walk Alone!
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #636: Jun 07, 2017 07:06:27 pm
      Doesn't quite make sense though. The start of the statement the club say about recent media speculation, to then saying about a misunderstanding and we have ended our interest.

      So are we taking responsibility for doing something we shouldn't have or are we taking responsibility for media speculation? Because media speculation is just that, speculation. There is always speculation.

      I don't think this is the end of anything VVD related, just a slight feeling I have. Probably entirely wrong though  :laugh:
      MarkMitt
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 2,800 posts | 337 
      • Give it your best every time!
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #637: Jun 07, 2017 07:07:16 pm
      The club had given the "green light" for Jürgen to contact VVD without making a formal offer. No doubt they believed they could entice him in, then lowball Southampton into a lesser fee. On the back of this, I fear the boss may "do one" to a club where there are less tw*ts involved...

      This is going to snowball...
      bad boy bubby
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 14,564 posts | 3172 
      • @KaiserQueef
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #638: Jun 07, 2017 07:07:25 pm
      Oh. Holy. F**k. 😯

      what-a-hit-son
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 16,506 posts | 4850 
      • t: @MrPrice1979 i: @klmprice101518
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #639: Jun 07, 2017 07:07:52 pm
      RedWilly
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 9,213 posts | 1646 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #640: Jun 07, 2017 07:08:25 pm
      Oh my god.

      The new low of Liverpool transfers this one. Most unprofessional club in transfer dealings I know.
      KS67
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 4,475 posts | 463 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #641: Jun 07, 2017 07:08:41 pm
      Just as I honestly thought we'd seen them change.

      We're a F***ing embarrassment at transfers.

      They realised they'd pushed the fee to high and walk off tail between legs.

      Just need to F**k up Salah now too.
      7-King Kenny-7
      • Lives on Sesame Street
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 44,014 posts | 5760 
      • You'll Never Walk Alone!
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #642: Jun 07, 2017 07:09:29 pm
      Also just goes to show that all the so called ITK's on twitter, like that Graeme Kelly, are full of sh*te.
      MarkMitt
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 2,800 posts | 337 
      • Give it your best every time!
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #643: Jun 07, 2017 07:11:20 pm
      Also just goes to show that all the so called ITK's on twitter, like that Graeme Kelly, are full of sh*te.

      Don't really follow twitter. Who is Graeme Kelly?

      Quick Reply