Trending Topics

      Next match: Betis v LFC [Friendly] Sat 27th Jul @ 12:30 am
      Acrisure Stadium

      Today is the 16th of June and on this date LFC's match record is P0 W0 D0 L0

      LFC Reds Poll

      Q. Are LFC genuinely interested?

      Yes we are ready to go head to head to sign him
      49 (44.1%)
      No, it's PR spin
      62 (55.9%)

      Total Members Voted: 109

      Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)

      Read 273960 times
      0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
      7-King Kenny-7
      • Lives on Sesame Street
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 44,014 posts | 5760 
      • You'll Never Walk Alone!
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #644: Jun 07, 2017 07:11:24 pm
      Vicks86
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,635 posts | 273 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #645: Jun 07, 2017 07:11:57 pm
      Dont worry! We've "initiated our interest" in another Dutch CB - De Vrij it is!!  ;D

      Now, paying the F***ing money that Lazio wants and be done with it.. 30mil euros?!
      wellbuilt
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,154 posts | 138 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #646: Jun 07, 2017 07:12:22 pm
      How can we get it so wrong again, it's not like we was tapping up messi  :lmao:

      We come across as complete novices in the transfer market, no wonder teams hold out for the millions and millions we seem to reluctantly overpay.

      Look at the dross we are trying to shift...recent overpriced junk.

      Balotelli was an Italian international and we gave him away for free in an era where Troy bloody deeney is worth 20 million+
      BostonScouse
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 715 posts | 106 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #647: Jun 07, 2017 07:12:23 pm
      Well, f@ck.
      littleface
      • Needs a Klopp hug or slap or both
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,283 posts | 253 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #648: Jun 07, 2017 07:14:46 pm
      Clusterfuck . Complete and total Clusterfuck. What are we apologizing to Southampton for ?

      How do you announce you have ended your interest in signing a player before going on to apologise to Southamptons  Board , fans , tea lady and ball boys ?

      Where is the f***in statement to our fans ?
      You know what ? GET THE F**k !!!@GOBSHITES RUN OUR CLUB.
      Billo
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 10,711 posts | 896 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #649: Jun 07, 2017 07:16:58 pm


      They realised they'd pushed the fee to high and walk off tail between legs.



      could be something in it, There was a huge sum for VVD. Could be that somebody wants him and somebody in the club is saying that he isnt worth the money.
      And the apology is there to insure that in future we can do business with them. That is the only thing i can think of, but lets be honest. we are not professionals at all.
      Diego LFC
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 19,340 posts | 2838 
      • Sempre Liverpool
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #650: Jun 07, 2017 07:17:22 pm
      How many deals that were supposedly close have we fu**ed up in recent times? Delle Ali is the most obvious example but I'm sure someone might have a ready made list. Haha
      Ribapuru
      • Banned
      • *****

      • 10,843 posts | 1371 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #651: Jun 07, 2017 07:17:38 pm
      Sound like the blame defecting I expect from Wenger. He was tapped up and Carra spouts bollocks blame Journo's.
      HamannsTheMan
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,031 posts | 1978 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #652: Jun 07, 2017 07:18:04 pm
      F***ing pissed off with this. I wanted van dijk more than anyone this summer and the way we've handled it is a F***ing joke. It's actually embarrassing.

      F***ing sick of this club handling transfers it's a F***ing piss take.

      redindian
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,991 posts | 241 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #653: Jun 07, 2017 07:18:08 pm
      What the F**k.. That's a new low in the  PR spin
      MarkMitt
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 2,800 posts | 337 
      • Give it your best every time!
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #654: Jun 07, 2017 07:20:22 pm
      How can we get it so wrong again, it's not like we was tapping up messi  :lmao:

      We come across as complete novices in the transfer market, no wonder teams hold out for the millions and millions we seem to reluctantly overpay.

      Look at the dross we are trying to shift...recent overpriced junk.

      Balotelli was an Italian international and we gave him away for free in an era where Troy bloody deeney is worth 20 million+

      Well said and unfortunately every word a true one.
      bad boy bubby
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 14,564 posts | 3172 
      • @KaiserQueef
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #655: Jun 07, 2017 07:21:02 pm
      "Lick my hole nice and publicly and I might, just might let you talk to Bertrand later."

      Tell you what tho... and irrespective of this particular clusterfuck; surely any "scouts" we have, [if they have any F***ing pride at all], should be embarrassed with the constant Southampton links. 😯
      LondonRed83
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 21,739 posts | 3948 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #656: Jun 07, 2017 07:21:19 pm
      Absolute joke club. Embarrassing beyond belief, surely someone has to be sacked for this monumental F**k up
      Diego LFC
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 19,340 posts | 2838 
      • Sempre Liverpool
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #657: Jun 07, 2017 07:23:29 pm
      Sound like the blame defecting I expect from Wenger. He was tapped up and Carra spouts bollocks blame Journo's.

      He's not blaming journalists, he's blaming the club for feeding their usual sources that the player had chosen LFC before they had even agreed a fee with Saints. Reddy, Joyce etc all reported it at the same time on twitter. When that happens the info is clearly coming from the club
      HScRed1
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 20,232 posts | 4421 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #658: Jun 07, 2017 07:24:52 pm
      F***ing embarrassing if any more proof needed this club is run by a group of amateurs.

      They should be praying Klopp sticks around with such incompetence!
      Arab Scouse
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 4,244 posts | 851 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #659: Jun 07, 2017 07:25:49 pm
      Ah well.. this is bad
      MIRO
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 12,989 posts | 3124 
      • Trust The Universe
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #660: Jun 07, 2017 07:28:06 pm
      Liverpool Football Club Statement.

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/40194862

      Liverpool have apologised to Southampton over "any misunderstanding" and ended their interest in defender Virgil van Dijk.

      Saints had said they would report Liverpool to the Premier League over an alleged illegal approach for him.

      The 25-year-old centre-back is wanted by a number of clubs and had stated his preference for a move to Anfield.

      Liverpool manager Jürgen Klopp had made signing the Netherlands international a top priority.

      Statement in full:

      "Liverpool Football Club would like to put on record our regret over recent media speculation regarding Southampton Football Club and player transfers between the two clubs.

      "We apologise to the owner, board of directors and fans of Southampton for any misunderstanding regarding Virgil van Dijk.

      "We respect Southampton's position and can confirm we have ended any interest in the player."

      -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Major blow for Liverpool

      The £50m-rated defender signed a new six-year contract last year, having joined Southampton from Celtic for £13m in September 2015.

      Premier League champions Chelsea and Manchester City have been heavily linked with the player, but City's interest had cooled as they were not prepared to pay as high a fee as Liverpool.

      Van Dijk missed the final five months of the season after sustaining an ankle injury following a challenge by Leicester City's Jamie Vardy in Southampton's 3-0 win at St Mary's on 22 January.

      It forced him to miss Southampton's EFL Cup final loss to Manchester United at Wembley.

      « Last Edit: Jun 07, 2017 07:33:57 pm by MIRO »
      Pippen
      • Forum Emlyn Hughes
      • ****

      • 692 posts | 46 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #661: Jun 07, 2017 07:29:26 pm
      There is a good thing: VVD was not worth that kind of money and maybe some new window opens, e.g. Aubameyang is still available.
      KopiteLuke
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 21,056 posts | 3784 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #662: Jun 07, 2017 07:32:35 pm
      Call me mad, but just because we've ended our interest, can't we then restart it? :lmao:

      Is that just a little too hopeful and desperate as I try to understand how the f**k this happened. Not sure I can agree with Carra either, that sounds a bit too much like covering up and pointing fingers where they shouldn't be there.

      Gonna wait for further details but this sounds pretty bad.
      ORCHARD RED
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 8,526 posts | 1457 
      • 6 Times!
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #663: Jun 07, 2017 07:33:34 pm
      Can't believe this news, I really believed FSG would spend that much on a player too!  :roll: Once again FSG show their ambition 👍
      fckmediocrity
      • Forum Billy Liddell
      • ****

      • 604 posts | 213 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #664: Jun 07, 2017 07:33:53 pm
      Can you imagine how Liverpool's transfer guys will be viewed in future negotiations..''so they've tried to get our guy and we threatened to make a complaint so the next day they've come with their pants down and apologized to us'' hahaha Edwards fck you for fcking this club over
      Arab Scouse
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 4,244 posts | 851 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #665: Jun 07, 2017 07:34:10 pm
      F***ing embarrassing if any more proof needed this club is run by a group of amateurs.

      They should be praying Klopp sticks around with such incompetence!

      I think Klopp is equally to blame too.

      If true and he's been texting the player ever since...
      NavyNick
      • Forum Emlyn Hughes
      • ****

      • 851 posts | 38 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #666: Jun 07, 2017 07:34:15 pm
      I just think Southampton were after a auction and hoped that Citeh and Chelsie would push the price past 70 mil. They pulled out and now it's just us after him and we won't offer silly prices. 

      Quick Reply