Trending Topics

      Next match: Fulham v LFC [Premier League] Sun 21st Apr @ 4:30 pm
      Craven Cottage

      Today is the 20th of April and on this date LFC's match record is P32 W19 D8 L5

      LFC Reds Poll

      Q. Are LFC genuinely interested?

      Yes we are ready to go head to head to sign him
      49 (44.1%)
      No, it's PR spin
      62 (55.9%)

      Total Members Voted: 109

      Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)

      Read 262555 times
      0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
      srslfc
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 32,145 posts | 4897 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1242: Jul 03, 2017 01:43:41 pm
      Er...  the football team; you know, the entity you support? 😕

      Call it an educated guess but I'm guessing that VvD was a primary target because Jürgen reckons we need a centre half of his calibre.

      If we leave it to the last hours (like we have done on numerous F***ing occasions, under these pricks) we run the risk of getting no F***ing one (as has happened before under these pricks).

      For 46 years now MY priority has been the football team y'all, not finance/business and certainly not multi millionaire owners... irrespective of their F***ing nationality. 😉

      Football first - no misplaced loyalties. 😒






      Yep.

      No sense in waiting. Just put a bid in and see how much it will take to land him.

      We've been seriously linked with Van Dijk, Keita, Salah and Ox all summer and I'd guess these are the players Jürgen was talking about when he mentioned the main ground work on transfers being done

      Over to the club to get these deals done.
      « Last Edit: Jul 03, 2017 02:03:32 pm by srslfc »
      Breeding-Reds-In-The-434
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,139 posts | 1084 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1243: Jul 03, 2017 02:47:00 pm
      Er...  the football team; you know, the entity you support? 😕

      Call it an educated guess but I'm guessing that VvD was a primary target because Jürgen reckons we need a centre half of his calibre.

      If we leave it to the last hours (like we have done on numerous f**king occasions, under these pricks) we run the risk of getting no f**king one (as has happened before under these pricks).

      For 46 years now MY priority has been the football team y'all, not finance/business and certainly not multi millionaire owners... irrespective of their f**king nationality. 😉

      Football first - no misplaced loyalties. 😒

      I'm just telling u how I think Klopp feels. He seems to have a target at each position and I'm okay with that. Klopp is a system guy and who are we to say he should get this guy or that guy? I trust Klopp. Along with we have already done and if we can land Keita and Ox and a LB that would be a great off season. Don't get me wrong, I think CB is as big a need as we have, and VVD is the best player we have been linked to. All I'm saying is get the other guys sewed up and then see if time and VVD's frustration change the Saints tune a month from now
      Mickred
      • Forum John Barnes
      • ***

      • 414 posts | 53 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1244: Jul 04, 2017 01:19:30 pm
      Would not at all be surprised if we got VVD near the end of the window.

       :kop5cf8koxp6:
      tezmac
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 11,196 posts | 913 
      • F**k the Sun F**k Murdoch F**k the press
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1245: Jul 04, 2017 03:36:54 pm

      Not a chance with this transfer committee
      stuey
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 36,001 posts | 3952 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1246: Jul 04, 2017 04:21:42 pm
      Er...  the football team; you know, the entity you support? 😕

      Call it an educated guess but I'm guessing that VvD was a primary target because Jürgen reckons we need a centre half of his calibre.

      If we leave it to the last hours (like we have done on numerous F***ing occasions, under these pricks) we run the risk of getting no F***ing one (as has happened before under these pricks).

      For 46 years now MY priority has been the football team y'all, not finance/business and certainly not multi millionaire owners... irrespective of their F***ing nationality. 😉

      Football first - no misplaced loyalties. 😒


      Is correct buddy, we look up for inspiration and all we see is pricks.

      Next season is judgement time, if they carry on behaving like cheapskate pricks next term there will be a change in attitude.
      We have a manager who is more than qualified and capable of doing a job for us, of bringing LFC success and glory, if he is denied the means of doing so there is only on party to take the bullets.

      In contrast to last season Jürgen has publicly expressed interest in some top flight players with associated top flight fees, if the cheapskate pricks don't get their game together and listen to the manager it is the beginning of the end for the Anfield romance with Herr Klopp.

      It's no coincidence this German fella is all over the media with talk about Klopp ''eventually'' going home to manage Bayern Munich.....better stop right there the room is going round!! 


      bad boy bubby
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 14,564 posts | 3172 
      • @KaiserQueef
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1247: Jul 04, 2017 06:09:12 pm
      I'm just telling u how I think Klopp feels.
      Oh? Well that's alright then.

      You work away telling us how Jürgen feels and operates. 👍

      It's just, when you asked a question, I assumed you were actually interested in reading an answer. 😕

      But no harm done.

      Klopp is a system guy and who are we to say he should get this guy or that guy?
      Just Reds on a forum but it's nice to see that fact hasn't stopped you letting us know that we should sign Robertson. 😄

      « Last Edit: Jul 04, 2017 06:46:49 pm by bad boy bubby »
      Breeding-Reds-In-The-434
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,139 posts | 1084 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1248: Jul 04, 2017 08:31:54 pm
      Oh? Well that's alright then.

      You work away telling us how Jürgen feels and operates. 👍

      It's just, when you asked a question, I assumed you were actually interested in reading an answer. 😕

      But no harm done.
      Just Reds on a forum but it's nice to see that fact hasn't stopped you letting us know that we should sign Robertson. 😄

      I see what you did there, taking a snippet of a comment and using it out of context. I did read your answer and i appreciate the response. But like most of your post the tone was off putting and condescending so I choose to let it go in one ear and out the other. The fact of the matter is Klopp has basically said that he isn't about getting just any Tom, Dick, or Harry at positions of need. It seems as though VVD is the only name of intrest on our CB list and I just SUGGESTED maybe we would be smart to wait and see how it plays out. What other CB have we really been linked to this summer? IMO none that seem to interest us enough to get a heavy rumor mill going. You stick to talking about how we should buy Messi and Ronaldo and I'll hold the fort down here in the real world.  ;)

      P.S: You really should check out Andy Robertson, he's not half bad. Good value on the money. But you know what, screw the money, lets offer Munich 250 mil for Alaba. What do u say? ;D
      harrydunn08
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 5,917 posts | 957 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1249: Jul 05, 2017 01:08:18 am
      Klopp has basically said that he isn't getting Harry. 

      Leave me out of this asshole!!
      what-a-hit-son
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 16,475 posts | 4821 
      • t: @MrPrice1979 i: @klmprice101518
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1250: Jul 06, 2017 03:34:55 pm
      what-a-hit-son
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 16,475 posts | 4821 
      • t: @MrPrice1979 i: @klmprice101518
      Robby The Z
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 9,034 posts | 2690 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1252: Jul 06, 2017 03:40:09 pm
      FATKOPITE10
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 14,385 posts | 3394 
      • Liverpool fc give me tourettes
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1253: Jul 06, 2017 03:42:28 pm
      6:30 p.m. GMT?

      Is this a total wind-up?


      Click bait for the gullible  (me included)
      PurpleMonkey
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 10,000 posts | 1991 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1254: Jul 06, 2017 04:14:09 pm
      6:30 p.m. GMT?

      Is this a total wind-up?


      It was! The breaking news was that VVD is back in training for Southampton, lmao. F***ing click bait wankers.
      what-a-hit-son
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 16,475 posts | 4821 
      • t: @MrPrice1979 i: @klmprice101518
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1255: Jul 06, 2017 04:36:49 pm
      Ha ha haa
      bad boy bubby
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 14,564 posts | 3172 
      • @KaiserQueef
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1256: Jul 06, 2017 09:45:33 pm
      . I did read your answer and i appreciate the response. But like most of your post the tone was off putting and condescending so I choose to let it go in one ear and out the other.
      Ouch rush me to the burns unit... playing to the gallery already; it didn't take you long. 😂

      I best be on my toes with what I post then. 😉
      « Last Edit: Jul 06, 2017 10:00:19 pm by bad boy bubby »
      HamannsTheMan
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,030 posts | 1973 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1257: Jul 07, 2017 02:04:53 pm
      Hahaha a lot of Everton fans jumping on a rumour that they've bid for him.

      FL Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 31,231 posts | 6359 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1258: Jul 07, 2017 02:30:35 pm
      Hahaha a lot of Everton fans jumping on a rumour that they've bid for him.



      They already spending that Lukaku money :lmao:
      ORCHARD RED
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 8,526 posts | 1457 
      • 6 Times!
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1259: Jul 07, 2017 09:48:05 pm
      harrydunn08
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 5,917 posts | 957 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1260: Jul 07, 2017 10:00:39 pm

      Joke of an article.  Fitting as Everton are a joke of a club....
      ORCHARD RED
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 8,526 posts | 1457 
      • 6 Times!
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1261: Jul 07, 2017 10:08:07 pm
      Joke of an article.  Fitting as Everton are a joke of a club....

      They're getting £75 million for Lukaku so why not?
      AZPatriot
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 9,944 posts | 1759 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1262: Jul 07, 2017 10:31:44 pm
      They're getting £75 million for Lukaku so why not?

      Hope they do launch a bid....means we can go right in behind it at the same price and you know VVD ain't stupid; he knows what color dominates the city and footy.
      mcarz
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 17,179 posts | 1355 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1263: Jul 07, 2017 10:54:58 pm
      They're getting £75 million for Lukaku so why not?

      Because they're Everton :D
      FL Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 31,231 posts | 6359 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #1264: Jul 07, 2017 11:11:17 pm
      Hope they do launch a bid....means we can go right in behind it at the same price and you know VVD ain't stupid; he knows what color dominates the city and footy.

      They are so stupid they don't even realize they'd be paving the way for us to sign him.....:lmao: clueless, bitter fools.

      Quick Reply