Trending Topics

      Next match: LFC v Spurs [Premier League] Sun 31st Mar @ 4:30 pm
      Anfield

      Today is the 26th of March and on this date LFC's match record is P18 W11 D3 L4

      We need to talk about Henderson...

      Read 26035 times
      0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
      7-King Kenny-7
      • Lives on Sesame Street
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 38,527 posts | 3148 
      • You'll Never Walk Alone!
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #330: Nov 04, 2017 11:49:36 am
      Totally disagree - players get sent off.

      He was over-reaching desperately trying to make up for a bad first touch. It happens - especially late on in games.

      Listen I’m one of the kid’s advocates - but I’ll criticise where it’s fair. On that one I just think it was something and nothing - saying he let the team down is (for me) bending the facts to suit a narrative.

      But hey - it’s 4 years ago so whatever.....

      PS: agree with you re Gerrard and no excuse for Suarez ban - he f#ckin’ bit someone ffs ;)

      Where have I actually said he let us down mate? I didn’t give an opinion either way, look back and you will see I was raising it as a question as to why that sending off wasn’t an extenuating circumstance. If that was just an unlucky sending off then surely that’s the same as a player being unlucky with an injury? Either way there were players missing that season so surely they should all come under the same bracket regardless of the reason as to why they were missing?
      Scotia
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 8,178 posts | 2295 
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #331: Nov 04, 2017 11:55:10 am
      Where have I actually said he let us down mate? I didn’t give an opinion either way, look back and you will see I was raising it as a question as to why that sending off wasn’t an extenuating circumstance. If that was just an unlucky sending off then surely that’s the same as a player being unlucky with an injury? Either way there were players missing that season so surely they should all come under the same bracket regardless of the reason as to why they were missing?

      Apols if misunderstood mate.

      I’m now in the middle of painting the sitting room (apparently we’ve a new sofa coming in a fortnight!) so im not gonna get chance to go looking back.

      There’s a lot in here blame him for every ill that befalls us and it’s just not fair / rational......I’m just primed for that type cannon fodder.

      Peace out. There emulsioning to be done ;)
      sore monad
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,101 posts | 207 
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #332: Nov 04, 2017 03:23:51 pm
      Not being daft at all but there can’t be “extenuating circumstances” such as Suarez being banned and things like Gerrard being older (bloody ridiculous argument that, look at Scholes/Terry etc) and Sturridge being injured but then not include a regular first team player being suspended for 3 of the last 4 games. Mistimed tackle or a complete wreck less one, it doesn’t matter, the outcome was the same in terms of his availability.

      Think you've misunderstood my post mate. I wasn't saying those were the reasons we didn't win the league, I was saying they were among the reasons why that team that had got to the level where they could compete for the league then when went into decline afterwards.
      I was also saying that ultimately the fault lay with FSG for not replacing those players who either declined or left with players of similar quality.
      DanMann
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,846 posts | 466 
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #333: Nov 04, 2017 04:20:04 pm
      Totally disagree - players get sent off.

      He was over-reaching desperately trying to make up for a bad first touch. It happens - especially late on in games.


      I believe the record states that it was Moses at fault for Henderson's red card.  ;)
      Scotia
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 8,178 posts | 2295 
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #334: Nov 04, 2017 04:34:15 pm
      I believe the record states that it was Moses at fault for Henderson's red card.  ;)

      Lol - touch was really shameful :)
      bmck
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 5,756 posts | 774 
      • YNWA
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #335: Nov 04, 2017 07:54:45 pm
      We have a new captain fantastic !   Led us to a 4-1 win.  Well in Migs.   Everyone in here must be made up :)
      Magillionare
      • Official LFC Reds Sig Maker. Lives on Sesame Street.
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 14,714 posts | 2186 
      • Hold on a minute, John Wayne hasn't arrived yet.
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #336: Nov 04, 2017 08:09:56 pm
      We have a new captain fantastic !   Led us to a 4-1 win.  Well in Migs.   Everyone in here must be made up :)

      Courtois and Kompany are in for a shock on Monday when Migs is named new captain and number 1 of Belgium
      Scottbot
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 7,313 posts | 1169 
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #337: Nov 05, 2017 08:30:12 am
      Can't remember who it was but someone suggested having a look at Henderson at CB. I actually think that's a decent idea. He has got some good attributes to play there.
      LFCSTEVE1984
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,662 posts | 374 
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #338: Nov 05, 2017 08:38:23 am
      Can't remember who it was but someone suggested having a look at Henderson at CB. I actually think that's a decent idea. He has got some good attributes to play there.

      Nar don't think he tackles enough, or puts his body on the line enough. Don't think he wins that many headers either.

      Plus he'd only have Mignolet to pass back to  :f_tongueincheek:
      alex1995
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,767 posts | 66 
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #339: Nov 05, 2017 09:09:04 am
      Did not miss him a bit yesterday... It says a lot about him.

      It's not that I don;t like him, in fact,  I think he could be a very good player playing like Lampard, but at DM/no.6 spot (like Klopp calls it), he is very average and when you're average, you cannot be captain.

      I don't mind that he's not a vocal leader but at least he should lead by example. He does not.
      HScRed1
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 14,219 posts | 2866 
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #340: Nov 05, 2017 10:05:07 am
      Nar don't think he tackles enough, or puts his body on the line enough. Don't think he wins that many headers either.

      Plus he'd only have Mignolet to pass back to  :f_tongueincheek:

      I agree He is pretty poor aerially a prerequisite for a CB.
      Harrisimo
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 2,400 posts | 331 
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #341: Nov 07, 2017 09:54:37 pm
      Can't remember who it was but someone suggested having a look at Henderson at CB. I actually think that's a decent idea. He has got some good attributes to play there.

      I made that call. Few weeks ago as it happens. I think he is a good midfield player but he does lack a little bit of imagination. I don't doubt his character, he's been thru a lot here and come thru as captain. He gives everything, it's just that he doesn't take the game by the scruff often enough. He can obviously be very impressive but his game is just a touch to predictable. That and the fact that I saw others make the move back into the back 4, notably Emlyn Hughes, Phil Thompson and others.

      I said in my original post that I thought Bob and Joe might of seen him as a center back, he can play, tackle, strong, not short of pace, decent in the air, can organise. I would give it some serious consideration. May be he has been sounded out....may be.
      racerx34
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 31,444 posts | 2248 
      • THE SALT IN THE SOUP
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #342: Nov 08, 2017 02:05:56 am
      Can't remember who it was but someone suggested having a look at Henderson at CB. I actually think that's a decent idea. He has got some good attributes to play there.

      Eventually this season, with everyone fit, it'll come down to him or Can in the deeper midfield role.
      I'd argue we could probably play Can in CB if it came down to it, and would nearly try it now if 4-2-3-1
      hasn't given us the answer we needed to being more solid.

      bad boy bubby
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 14,536 posts | 3140 
      • Better Red Than Dead @KaiserQueef
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #343: Nov 08, 2017 09:07:37 am
      I agree He is pretty poor aerially a prerequisite for a CB.

      I wouldn't be sure that being "Poor aerially" is a prerequisite for a Centre Half mate. 😊

      Joking aside, I get what you meant but...

      "Poor aerially"? Is he really? Hmm...

      Henderson (according to the offal) has won 70.6% of all his aerial duels.

      Klavan and Gomez (the armchair aide's alternative to Lovren) - 55.2% & 50%, respectively. [Emre Can - only 47.1% btw]

      Strangely enough Lovren scores 71.8% and, as you would expect, Matip scores highest with a whopping 84.4%.

      Just for some perspective; Virgil van Dijk  yeah... that Virgil van Dijk scores 67.4%. 😕

      As ever; people's perceptions of Jordan tend to cloud their judgement. Thankfully a lot of what folk say out loud, in the hope it's right, can be checked. 👍
      « Last Edit: Nov 08, 2017 09:29:17 am by bad boy bubby »
      LondonRed83
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 8,555 posts | 1015 
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #344: Nov 08, 2017 09:29:42 am
      Surely it’s clear to see how much Henderson divides opinion. We don’t have the same argument about anyone in the team and for a Captain that says it all.

      He’s an ok squad player, but he should be upgraded ASAP.
      bad boy bubby
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 14,536 posts | 3140 
      • Better Red Than Dead @KaiserQueef
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #345: Nov 08, 2017 10:36:41 am
      Surely it’s clear to see how much Henderson divides opinion.
      And that is good and healthy, from a forum perspective.

      Here's where I am at: I, genuinely, believe Jürgen picks, his teams, on merit. Jürgen picks Hendo because he sees him as his best option, there on merit. I also believe that Jürgen will drop him if needs be.

      If I didn't believe that then, take my word for it; I would be angry at Jürgen and vocal as f**k about it but...

      Here's the rub for me: there are many on here who are vocal as f**k in professing their "love"/"trust" for Jürgen who clearly don't believe he can be trusted to pick, his best team, on merit. Otherwise they wouldn't be squealing like stuck pigs every time Jordan gets picked.

      Weird that - unless... 🐑🐑🐑 🤔
      « Last Edit: Nov 08, 2017 11:07:35 am by bad boy bubby »
      HScRed1
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 14,219 posts | 2866 
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #346: Nov 08, 2017 01:57:48 pm
      I wouldn't be sure that being "Poor aerially" is a prerequisite for a Centre Half mate. 😊

      Joking aside, I get what you meant but...

      "Poor aerially"? Is he really? Hmm...

      Henderson (according to the offal) has won 70.6% of all his aerial duels.

      Klavan and Gomez (the armchair aide's alternative to Lovren) - 55.2% & 50%, respectively. [Emre Can - only 47.1% btw]

      Strangely enough Lovren scores 71.8% and, as you would expect, Matip scores highest with a whopping 84.4%.

      Just for some perspective; Virgil van Dijk  yeah... that Virgil van Dijk scores 67.4%. 😕

      As ever; people's perceptions of Jordan tend to cloud their judgement. Thankfully a lot of what folk say out loud, in the hope it's right, can be checked. 👍

      Stats and damn lies come to mind.
      Makes you wonder what Klopp sees in VVD. :)

      If Hendo was so good aerially he might chip in with the odd headed goal or even help out defensively?

      I think comparing Hendo in midfield competing against relatively smaller midfielders to what CB's have to cope with is not exactly a like for like measure.

      FL Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 23,427 posts | 3262 
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #347: Nov 08, 2017 02:30:31 pm
      Surely it’s clear to see how much Henderson divides opinion. We don’t have the same argument about anyone in the team and for a Captain that says it all.

      He’s an ok squad player, but he should be upgraded ASAP.

      I'd wager to say that Can, Gini and Milner also divide opinion a good deal...and maybe even Moreno (who I'm still cautiously optimistic about but  I feel like he's going to let us down at some point).
      Scotia
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 8,178 posts | 2295 
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #348: Nov 08, 2017 02:38:35 pm
      I'd wager to say that Can, Gini and Milner.......and maybe even Moreno

      Hell yes, nah, ish and oh yes......
      bad boy bubby
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 14,536 posts | 3140 
      • Better Red Than Dead @KaiserQueef
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #349: Nov 08, 2017 05:06:08 pm
      Makes you wonder what Klopp sees in VVD.
      The same thing he sees in Henderson probably. 😉

      Just to be clear, it was YOU who said aerial ability was a "prerequisite" NOT me. 😂
      HScRed1
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 14,219 posts | 2866 
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #350: Nov 08, 2017 05:21:52 pm
      The same thing he sees in Henderson probably. 😉

      Just to be clear, it was YOU who said aerial ability was a "prerequisite" NOT me. 😂


      Aerial ability in my opinion is a prerequisite to be a decent CB, and it you who is comparing the stats of a midfielder to a CB!

      FATKOPITE10
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 9,714 posts | 1616 
      • Liverpool fc give me tourettes
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #351: Nov 08, 2017 06:45:21 pm
      I wouldn't be sure that being "Poor aerially" is a prerequisite for a Centre Half mate. 😊

      Joking aside, I get what you meant but...

      "Poor aerially"? Is he really? Hmm...

      Henderson (according to the offal) has won 70.6% of all his aerial duels.

      Klavan and Gomez (the armchair aide's alternative to Lovren) - 55.2% & 50%, respectively. [Emre Can - only 47.1% btw]

      Strangely enough Lovren scores 71.8% and, as you would expect, Matip scores highest with a whopping 84.4%.

      Just for some perspective; Virgil van Dijk  yeah... that Virgil van Dijk scores 67.4%. 😕

      As ever; people's perceptions of Jordan tend to cloud their judgement. Thankfully a lot of what folk say out loud, in the hope it's right, can be checked. 👍

      101% of stats mean nothing-much
      bad boy bubby
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 14,536 posts | 3140 
      • Better Red Than Dead @KaiserQueef
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #352: Nov 08, 2017 06:52:34 pm
      Aerial ability in my opinion is a prerequisite to be a decent CB, and it you who is comparing the stats of a midfielder to a CB!


      Did I? Is that what you saw?

      What actually happened:

      * I gave you Henderson's stats re: aerial duels won.

      * Quite separately I then gave you, so that you may compare, the same stats [aerial duels] for all our Centre Backs under Jürgen. Those stats [Klavan & Gomez]  appeared to show that aerial ability wasn't a prerequisite in Jürgen's mind. Otherwise he wouldn't have picked them; right?

      * I gave the stats (separated by brackets) of Emre Can, by way of a comparison with another LFC midfielder. He [Emre Can] was presumably playing against the same "smaller" players; yes?
      (Although how any-f**king-one can tell if the duels were against wee Aguero or lanky Matic, f**k knows. Lies, damned lies and just guessing; I suppose.  😁) I digress...

      * I also gave VvD's stats by way of a comparison,  like for like, with Jürgen's current Centre Backs. Only Joel really stood out as having your prerequisite for that position.  😉

      * Although you clearly believed I did; if you read the post, at no point did I actually compare Henderson with any of our Centre Backs. I merely offered the Club's own stats to refute your assertion [based on guessing] that Henderson was poor in the air and that aerial ability, in  CB, was a prerequisite (for this club).

      Now... whilst I am truly sorry that the Club's own stats don't fit your narrative, I'm still adamant that, if they had, then you would never had mentioned "stats and lies". Am I right?  Go on you know I'm right. 😉😄

      So anywho... 'Henderson: what does Jürgen see that 'we don't?'  Discuss...

      « Last Edit: Nov 08, 2017 07:03:47 pm by bad boy bubby »
      bad boy bubby
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 14,536 posts | 3140 
      • Better Red Than Dead @KaiserQueef
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #353: Nov 08, 2017 06:53:16 pm
      And the other 37% are made up. 😊

      HScRed1
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 14,219 posts | 2866 
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #354: Nov 08, 2017 09:45:14 pm
      Did I? Is that what you saw?

      What actually happened:

      * I gave you Henderson's stats re: aerial duels won.

      * Quite separately I then gave you, so that you may compare, the same stats [aerial duels] for all our Centre Backs under Jürgen. Those stats [Klavan & Gomez]  appeared to show that aerial ability wasn't a prerequisite in Jürgen's mind. Otherwise he wouldn't have picked them; right?

      * I gave the stats (separated by brackets) of Emre Can, by way of a comparison with another LFC midfielder. He [Emre Can] was presumably playing against the same "smaller" players; yes?
      (Although how any-f**king-one can tell if the duels were against wee Aguero or lanky Matic, f**k knows. Lies, damned lies and just guessing; I suppose.  😁) I digress...

      * I also gave VvD's stats by way of a comparison,  like for like, with Jürgen's current Centre Backs. Only Joel really stood out as having your prerequisite for that position.  😉

      * Although you clearly believed I did; if you read the post, at no point did I actually compare Henderson with any of our Centre Backs. I merely offered the Club's own stats to refute your assertion [based on guessing] that Henderson was poor in the air and that aerial ability, in  CB, was a prerequisite (for this club).

      Now... whilst I am truly sorry that the Club's own stats don't fit your narrative, I'm still adamant that, if they had, then you would never had mentioned "stats and lies". Am I right?  Go on you know I'm right. 😉😄

      So anywho... 'Henderson: what does Jürgen see that 'we don't?'  Discuss...



      Erm ok. Still no idea what you are trying to show if it's not that the stats would suggest Henderson's aerial duels won were good enough to show he can play as a CB.

      BTW if using stats it would be fairer to use a bigger and fairer sample.

      e.g. VVD has hardly played this season so if you compare last seasons data where he played in more games VVD dominates all of our CB's in all parameters not just aerial duels.

      Maybe Jurgens not as mad as I initially thought  :D




      lester76
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 4,764 posts | 225 
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #355: Nov 09, 2017 04:09:01 am
      I actually think think that Hendo could be trained into a pretty adequate defensive midfielder.
      He offers little going forward, loves a side wards pass and the occasional cross fielder, can track back well and enjoys a tackle.
      Problem is that it’s a square peg in a round hole.
      Personally want to see Grujic get more games and Can to be utterly binned. Don’t get the over evaluation of emre.
      pug
      • On Trial

      • 3 posts |
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #356: Nov 09, 2017 10:28:29 pm
      I wouldn't be sure that being "Poor aerially" is a prerequisite for a Centre Half mate. 😊

      Joking aside, I get what you meant but...

      "Poor aerially"? Is he really? Hmm...

      Henderson (according to the offal) has won 70.6% of all his aerial duels.

      Klavan and Gomez (the armchair aide's alternative to Lovren) - 55.2% & 50%, respectively. [Emre Can - only 47.1% btw]

      Strangely enough Lovren scores 71.8% and, as you would expect, Matip scores highest with a whopping 84.4%.

      Just for some perspective; Virgil van Dijk  yeah... that Virgil van Dijk scores 67.4%. 😕

      As ever; people's perceptions of Jordan tend to cloud their judgement. Thankfully a lot of what folk say out loud, in the hope it's right, can be checked. 👍
      I always feel that the fans who support Henderson , do so out of a misguided allegiance to a player promoted above his station . Reading posters talking up stats on Henderson is deeply depressing. Are there really fans out there who watch him play and think " What a player "  Any player that constantly needs stats to back him up is limited.
      Look, we're stuck with him for the time being but it's HIM not us who needs to start proving the doubters ( of which there is many ) wrong.
      I can't see it happening.

      AZPatriot
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 9,769 posts | 1641 
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #357: Nov 09, 2017 11:00:13 pm
      I always feel that the fans who support Henderson , do so out of a misguided allegiance to a player promoted above his station . Reading posters talking up stats on Henderson is deeply depressing. Are there really fans out there who watch him play and think " What a player "  Any player that constantly needs stats to back him up is limited.
      Look, we're stuck with him for the time being but it's HIM not us who needs to start proving the doubters ( of which there is many ) wrong.
      I can't see it happening.



      Welcome back littleshite....sorry to see you leave so soon.
      Magillionare
      • Official LFC Reds Sig Maker. Lives on Sesame Street.
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 14,714 posts | 2186 
      • Hold on a minute, John Wayne hasn't arrived yet.
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #358: Nov 19, 2017 03:05:02 am
      I f**king love the silence in this thread.



      Can't wait until we lose and it's all Hendo's fault again and we can all come out and play the who's the moron game again.
      Scottbot
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 7,313 posts | 1169 
      Re: We need to talk about Henderson...
      Reply #359: Nov 19, 2017 07:14:57 am
      Had a decent game yesterday. He always looks a better player when his isn't asked to play in a midfield three with Can and Gigi, we only ever need two from those three. The third midfielder should always be Coutinho or Lallana when he is fit.

      Quick Reply