The club is self sufficient- sales are always included within the income 🤷āāļø
Net spend is something used by people like you to point fingers at the owners
I take no interest in net spend - I only take interest in the player that arrives - whether that player is a free transfer or costs Ā£60mil - itās always will be about the players ability
Iāll take a MacAllister over a Mason Mount. The fees are irrelevant- their ability is
I've never understood the argument against net spend. That's how you measure investment properly. Without it, owners, in any business, could sell off all the valuable assets, rake in a load of money, then spend 10% of it and go "look, we're investing!", when actually they are asset stripping.
FSG are not asset stripping, but net spend measures this. Your measure doesn't, and is effectively meaningless.
(Deep down you know this, which is why you simultaneously make a different argument - that you only look at the quality of the players and ignore the money altogether - "fees are irrelevant" etc)
Logged