Trending Topics

      Next match: LFC v Spurs [Premier League] Sun 5th May @ 4:30 pm
      Anfield

      Today is the 28th of April and on this date LFC's match record is P27 W14 D8 L5

      Is English officiating corrupt?

      Read 61159 times
      0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.
      LFCbronx
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,402 posts | 191 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #483: Oct 05, 2023 11:16:24 pm
      But they meant everything to get the game to that situation

      Leagues are won over the course of the season not on the basis of won result

      Yeah , both teams dropped points all season.  Doesn't matter.  After they played all their games It was still a one off for the title. We blew it.

      So that year , the title was decided in one game head to head.   Cant even remember any other time that happened.

      Don't wanna get into a tit for tat with ya.  Lets let it go as we have different logic

      Harrisimo
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 8,288 posts | 1401 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #484: Oct 05, 2023 11:28:03 pm
      VAR decisions on on/offside should be done with regimented discipline. Well defined clear terms. Once a goal is scored a VAR checks the validity. No further communication with the 'on field' officials unless it is absolutely necessary. The 'on field' decision has no bearing whatsoever re the decision.. This is exclusively for on/offside decisions.

      Then it's either...1.On Off Check complete, awards a goal....or..2 On/Off check complete, disallow the goal. They could if necessary add 'player interfering or player not interfering' if it's an on/offside check against players not scoring the goal

      That's it. None of this matey chat. Nothing difficult in that. And simple to adhere to. Why the hell they haven't got some simplified system, like that, in place ,is anybody's guess.

      VAR has been in place since 2017/18....how long does it take to get a simple system like this in place FFS.

      -LFC-
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 4,219 posts | 1221 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #485: Oct 05, 2023 11:49:04 pm
      VAR decisions on on/offside should be done with regimented discipline. Well defined clear terms. Once a goal is scored a VAR checks the validity. No further communication with the 'on field' officials unless it is absolutely necessary. The 'on field' decision has no bearing whatsoever re the decision.. This is exclusively for on/offside decisions.

      Then it's either...1.On Off Check complete, awards a goal....or..2 On/Off check complete, disallow the goal. They could if necessary add 'player interfering or player not interfering' if it's an on/offside check against players not scoring the goal

      That's it. None of this matey chat. Nothing difficult in that. And simple to adhere to. Why the hell they haven't got some simplified system, like that, in place ,is anybody's guess.

      VAR has been in place since 2017/18....how long does it take to get a simple system like this in place FFS.



      Agree but I would drop 'check complete' entirely as they will always complete their check and still likely get confused. They should be made to say 'your on-field decision was 'x'; VAR has concluded 'y' because 'z'. The ref should be made to repeat their recommendation back to them. None of this matey chat -- Daz are you sure about that, cheers mate, good process etc. So embarrassing. Just do your job you bell ends.
      PastorGeek
      • Not Actual Geek
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 2,564 posts | 730 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #486: Oct 06, 2023 03:00:51 am

      i responded to you because you quoted to me when I was replying to someone else. Take your own advice.
      Longy-Shops
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,310 posts | 775 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #487: Oct 06, 2023 11:31:56 am
      VAR decisions on on/offside should be done with regimented discipline. Well defined clear terms. Once a goal is scored a VAR checks the validity. No further communication with the 'on field' officials unless it is absolutely necessary. The 'on field' decision has no bearing whatsoever re the decision.. This is exclusively for on/offside decisions.

      Then it's either...1.On Off Check complete, awards a goal....or..2 On/Off check complete, disallow the goal. They could if necessary add 'player interfering or player not interfering' if it's an on/offside check against players not scoring the goal

      That's it. None of this matey chat. Nothing difficult in that. And simple to adhere to. Why the hell they haven't got some simplified system, like that, in place ,is anybody's guess.

      VAR has been in place since 2017/18....how long does it take to get a simple system like this in place FFS.
      It should be "Check complete, it's a goal, you can award the goal ...or...Check complete it's not a goal, do not award the goal.
      Harrisimo
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 8,288 posts | 1401 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #488: Oct 06, 2023 12:17:11 pm
      It should be "Check complete, it's a goal, you can award the goal ...or...Check complete it's not a goal, do not award the goal.

      Well yes, they should have rigid discipline regarding the terminology. That's basic stuff. Communication lines have to be disciplined. They should by now have a well defined easy to use efficient system.

      Wouldn't like to attend a piss up in a brewery with them.
      Longy-Shops
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,310 posts | 775 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #489: Oct 06, 2023 12:42:41 pm
      Well yes, they should have rigid discipline regarding the terminology. That's basic stuff. Communication lines have to be disciplined. They should by now have a well defined easy to use efficient system.

      Wouldn't like to attend a piss up in a brewery with them.
      Imagine a judge in a criminal trial when sentencing:  Jury: It seems to us on the evidence we've heard that it wouldn't be unreasonable to convict. ...Judge: So wait are you all in agreement and that I announce he is guilty? ...Jury: Well, it's not for us to put words in your most honour's mouth etc. etc.
      lfc across the water
      • Needs a Klopp hug...Rafa's Number 1 fan...VAR has no faults Promoter
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,863 posts | 704 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #490: Oct 06, 2023 09:21:19 pm
      Quote from LFCbronx
      We won the league with 8 games to play.  And they dont get 99% of the calls correct. Especially handballs and red cards, which are objective.  Nowhere near.  Ask Wolves after Onana wiped out  their player and no penalty was given. Remember the obvious handball City commited vs the Blueshit that cost us a F***ing league.  Do you??

      They get it it wrong just as much now as the old referees did without it.  Iv'e seen offsides lines drawn in the wrong places on multiple occasions.  get rid of this VAR  bullshit .  What about the handball vs Chelsea in the 1st game of the year??? Got that one wrong too.  And i cant even remember who it was vs Spurs that got basically smashed in the face (Endo?) . No review on that either.  Its a failed system. the only thing that should be reviewed is Goal line

      There's so many clear and obvious errors in that post, I almost lost count.

      Endo wasn't smashed in the face. He was gently brushed aside by his opponent. Slow Mo of course makes it look like a violent assault.
      The handball in the first game of the season could be argued, as too close or natural position. Hence why it wasn't given.
      The obvious handball by City, cost their opponents on the day an opportunity to equalise. That's all it did. There's no guarantee it would have been scored, and in any case, there was still about 10 games left to play. When we went to City afterwards, VAR spotted an offside, and we got a point to keep the race going.
      We won the league with 7 games still to play, because on the night it was confirmed, the VAR advised the ref to give a penalty for handball in a City game, because he missed it.

      Quote from RedWilly
      Liar.

      14 apologies in two seasons. A club plays 38 games a season so they’ve had to apologise for over 1/3rd of a seasons worth of games on that time. That’s a huge huge impact.

      And that’s just ones they’ve apologised for.

      You kept on about how VAR was perfect and ignored and argued with anyone who said it doesn’t work because of those operating it.

      You’re a liar and turning in the wind at how your precious VAR has been a disaster.

      And we all know you only care about it cos you’re still crying about the Henry handball.

      More clear and obvious errors to clear up. You'd think you were actually operating the thing itself at the weekend.

      The club didn't receive an apology. Nobody receives apologies after serious howlers made. They receive acknowledgements; official recognition of the seriousness of the howler, and that steps have been taken to prevent it reoccurring. Surely you know the difference.

      Five years ago, the linesman putting his flag up in error last weekend wouldn't even have been checked, let alone reviewed. Instead there would have been stone cold silence from the people who need to talk, there and then. Now it could be reviewed, and the technology did the job it's supposed to do, unfortunately the man in charge didn't. And now he's serving a ban for it.

      Unfortunately there has been the need to make 14 official acknowledgements. It's 14 too many, but it's considerably less than the 14 per month that would be required, if VAR was unavailable.

      I never said VAR was perfect, it's not supposed to be perfect. It's designed to cut the errors down to less than 1%, which it does. If a VAR has approx 10 incidents to check during the average game and he calls 9 of them right, sadly it's the other one that will attract all the attention. And an automatic ban coming his way for a decision that requires an official acknowledgement afterwards.

      I wanted video technology in this sport, since other sports had it available. That's what, 20-30 years ago?? And every ref howler demonstrates why that is. If other sports are able to use technology, football should not be left behind. I don't want cheats to succeed in football when they can't in other sports. Now thankfully we have it available, but it still needs qualified refs to concentrate on their job, not mistakenly say "check complete" out of habit before the check is completed, as this one did.

      If people laugh at the idea of acknowledgements made, then calls for uncontested goals and replays after the event, probably has them in stitches. It's embarrassing. For good reason, the laws of the game do not allow the game to be called back once play has restarted, to prevent absolute complete and utter chaos. I wouldn't like to be the match official who has to tell Jürgen, to instruct our players to do a Bielsa in the last minute of a cup final, because a VAR official made a serious error of judgement 5 minutes earlier. I wouldn't like to read the response to it here, or hear the crowd reaction either.

      Quote from ruthcity
      He’s just trying. At least he’s passionate enough to push for this option as the Liverpool manager. How many mangers have the guts to advocate this? Me can see his passion. And that’s what you want from your manager.

      Not yeah agree they can’t do anything according the rules - play has restarted. I’m happy they followed the rules. Following the rules is more important than being passionate. You want such a manager? There’s one of us here.

      But they can't do anything according to the rules. They're there for a reason, not to be discarded when it suits.

      You have people regularly demanding time limits of 60 seconds for VAR calls. Well, the time limit is the restart of play. That rule is there to prevent total chaos. Games could last hours waiting on that 25th penalty claim by City waiting to be reviewed and decided. Who the hell wants that?

      Quote from billythered
      So let’s do it, and let’s do it right……This Time…copy that of Rugby league/union, where we can all hear the communication between the ref & VAR, have the footage of the contentious issue up on the big screens so everyone inside the stadium can see as well as hear, show the lines implemented for on/off side decisions, referees to be interviewed post match for query’s of why this or that decision was made, assistant refs to flag immediately if clear daylight can be seen between striker & defender, give the attacker the benefit of the doubt, it’s a entertainment business…we want to see more goals….continue to book players taking the piss, ie; feigned injuries, wasting time, less gobbing off / swearing at the Ref, imaginary cards, surrounding the ref if something goes against you, yada yada yada, all of those imo would be welcome and would help with Ref/player/fan relations,

      Not saying we should all be squeaky clean and rename the EPL The English Woke League but whatever respect referee’s had years ago has gone, the modern players have too much power, with their inflated egos and equally inflated bank accounts, nor am I saying players should address the Ref as Sir, just show mutual respect for fellow professionals, now here’s where it kinda breaks down, the standard of referee’s in the EPL is obviously substandard, and has to improve, hence players inadvertent disrespect for the Ref, …..Carra & Ratboy did a doc a couple of seasons back where they spent a day at Ref training camp, it was tough going despite their lack of fitness, wouldn’t be a bad thing for the PGMOL to show players what Refs have to go through, it might change players mindsets and make things easier on the pitch,

      YNWA

      You can't hear the communication because IFAB won't allow it. Probably will in a few years time, but you can't hear it now. Next year we should be able to hear the outcome of VAR reviews in stadiums, similar to the WWC. No it's not ideal, but it's the first step on the way to full open conversations in the future.

      Of course it is great to hear those conversations when you're a native speaker of the relevant language. When you're not, it's not much better than what we have atm, and if you're someone like Darwin or Diaz, who are more than likely to be the centre of attention in our case, it makes no difference.

      Refs have never got respect, never will either. When was Webb last respected? Moss? Atkinson? Riley? Dean? Taylor? Tierney? The culture of the game, has always been to treat the referee as an opponent, to be conned influenced intimidated and deceived at every opportunity, and after that, held responsible for the outcome. Even in leagues  where there is no VAR such as my own national league, nobody accepts their human errors, they still get blamed for everything.

      We're not returning to the bad old days, no matter how much noise is made. As an away side, going to grounds such as the toilet is difficult enough with VAR, but the prospect of us having to go there with no VAR, (knowing the long history of human errors we've been subjected to in that insufferable dump) is about as sensible imo as jumping off a plane without a parachute. It's an idea too stupid to contemplate nowadays. 
      HUYTON RED
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 40,235 posts | 8573 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #491: Oct 07, 2023 08:15:39 pm
      Talk about war and peace!! :laugh:
      Lallana in Pyjamas
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 13,049 posts | 3431 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #492: Oct 07, 2023 08:37:04 pm
      There's so many clear and obvious errors in that post, I almost lost count.

      Endo wasn't smashed in the face. He was gently brushed aside by his opponent. Slow Mo of course makes it look like a violent assault.
      The handball in the first game of the season could be argued, as too close or natural position. Hence why it wasn't given.
      The obvious handball by City, cost their opponents on the day an opportunity to equalise. That's all it did. There's no guarantee it would have been scored, and in any case, there was still about 10 games left to play. When we went to City afterwards, VAR spotted an offside, and we got a point to keep the race going.
      We won the league with 7 games still to play, because on the night it was confirmed, the VAR advised the ref to give a penalty for handball in a City game, because he missed it.

      More clear and obvious errors to clear up. You'd think you were actually operating the thing itself at the weekend.

      The club didn't receive an apology. Nobody receives apologies after serious howlers made. They receive acknowledgements; official recognition of the seriousness of the howler, and that steps have been taken to prevent it reoccurring. Surely you know the difference.

      Five years ago, the linesman putting his flag up in error last weekend wouldn't even have been checked, let alone reviewed. Instead there would have been stone cold silence from the people who need to talk, there and then. Now it could be reviewed, and the technology did the job it's supposed to do, unfortunately the man in charge didn't. And now he's serving a ban for it.

      Unfortunately there has been the need to make 14 official acknowledgements. It's 14 too many, but it's considerably less than the 14 per month that would be required, if VAR was unavailable.

      I never said VAR was perfect, it's not supposed to be perfect. It's designed to cut the errors down to less than 1%, which it does. If a VAR has approx 10 incidents to check during the average game and he calls 9 of them right, sadly it's the other one that will attract all the attention. And an automatic ban coming his way for a decision that requires an official acknowledgement afterwards.

      I wanted video technology in this sport, since other sports had it available. That's what, 20-30 years ago?? And every ref howler demonstrates why that is. If other sports are able to use technology, football should not be left behind. I don't want cheats to succeed in football when they can't in other sports. Now thankfully we have it available, but it still needs qualified refs to concentrate on their job, not mistakenly say "check complete" out of habit before the check is completed, as this one did.

      If people laugh at the idea of acknowledgements made, then calls for uncontested goals and replays after the event, probably has them in stitches. It's embarrassing. For good reason, the laws of the game do not allow the game to be called back once play has restarted, to prevent absolute complete and utter chaos. I wouldn't like to be the match official who has to tell Jürgen, to instruct our players to do a Bielsa in the last minute of a cup final, because a VAR official made a serious error of judgement 5 minutes earlier. I wouldn't like to read the response to it here, or hear the crowd reaction either.

      But they can't do anything according to the rules. They're there for a reason, not to be discarded when it suits.

      You have people regularly demanding time limits of 60 seconds for VAR calls. Well, the time limit is the restart of play. That rule is there to prevent total chaos. Games could last hours waiting on that 25th penalty claim by City waiting to be reviewed and decided. Who the hell wants that?

      You can't hear the communication because IFAB won't allow it. Probably will in a few years time, but you can't hear it now. Next year we should be able to hear the outcome of VAR reviews in stadiums, similar to the WWC. No it's not ideal, but it's the first step on the way to full open conversations in the future.

      Of course it is great to hear those conversations when you're a native speaker of the relevant language. When you're not, it's not much better than what we have atm, and if you're someone like Darwin or Diaz, who are more than likely to be the centre of attention in our case, it makes no difference.

      Refs have never got respect, never will either. When was Webb last respected? Moss? Atkinson? Riley? Dean? Taylor? Tierney? The culture of the game, has always been to treat the referee as an opponent, to be conned influenced intimidated and deceived at every opportunity, and after that, held responsible for the outcome. Even in leagues  where there is no VAR such as my own national league, nobody accepts their human errors, they still get blamed for everything.

      We're not returning to the bad old days, no matter how much noise is made. As an away side, going to grounds such as the toilet is difficult enough with VAR, but the prospect of us having to go there with no VAR, (knowing the long history of human errors we've been subjected to in that insufferable dump) is about as sensible imo as jumping off a plane without a parachute. It's an idea too stupid to contemplate nowadays.

      Summary 🤷‍♂️
      GERNS
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 12,343 posts | 1529 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #493: Oct 07, 2023 08:54:43 pm
      VAR decisions on on/offside should be done with regimented discipline. Well defined clear terms. Once a goal is scored a VAR checks the validity. No further communication with the 'on field' officials unless it is absolutely necessary. The 'on field' decision has no bearing whatsoever re the decision.. This is exclusively for on/offside decisions.

      Then it's either...1.On Off Check complete, awards a goal....or..2 On/Off check complete, disallow the goal. They could if necessary add 'player interfering or player not interfering' if it's an on/offside check against players not scoring the goal

      That's it. None of this matey chat. Nothing difficult in that. And simple to adhere to. Why the hell they haven't got some simplified system, like that, in place ,is anybody's guess.

      VAR has been in place since 2017/18....how long does it take to get a simple system like this in place FFS.



      Because they need that margin of indecision to favour ‘their’ team, or to back up their mates.
      Harrisimo
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 8,288 posts | 1401 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #494: Oct 07, 2023 09:12:46 pm
      I would say there are very few calling for VAR to be scrapped. It's a vastly improved 'service' that is required. At the minute it's inconsistent due in part, to slack or casual procedure.

      There has to be uniformity. A very well defined way of the decision making process. So that all concerned are singing from the same hymn sheet. There should be no misunderstanding or miscommunication. The ludicrous muttering of England and Hooper were symptomatic of a slap dash sloppy ill thought out decision making procedure.

      Haven't seen or heard much from PGMOL or the Premier League. No clear statement that indicates they understand what caused the confusion or how they are going to put it right. Banning England from our games is very odd and I would like to be able to hear transcripts of earlier games when England was the VAR ref, especially how he handled on/offside decisions.
      Harrisimo
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 8,288 posts | 1401 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #495: Oct 07, 2023 11:05:29 pm
      Because they need that margin of indecision to favour ‘their’ team, or to back up their mates.

      Agenda..easily passed off as a 'mistake'. Well wouldn't like to seriously suggest that.
      GERNS
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 12,343 posts | 1529 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #496: Oct 08, 2023 12:12:22 pm
      When I watch live games on tv, it’s evident that replays of incidents are available in about 2 seconds.
      First we need to remember this is a contact sport and contact is not necessarily a foul. I think every time the ref blows for an incident, there should be a quick review to see if ‘the alledged contact’ was in fact a foul.
      So many players on the ball feel they are losing out to a challenge and go to ground feigning a foul which the refs fall for.
      This needs ironing out first to eradicate the diving. The Bissouma incident for spurs was dealt with perfectly yesterday, but do many dive when a hand touches their back. Since when did that become foul play ?
      If there’s a deliberate and clear push, ok, but a quick review would sort out the pushes and the dives !
      If there’s 20 incidents a game and there were 5 seconds to take a look at a replay, that’s less than 2 minutes a game, and less time than the supposed foul would take for the free kick. And as time goes on, and the divers realise they will be carded, there will be less incidents a game to review.
      There is a solution to get the game back where it should be, but the idiot commentators screaming, ‘yeah there was contact’ are playing into the divers hands. A review would indicate if the contact was enough to make the player drop like he’d been hit with a snipers bullet, or if it was of no significance.

      We need to eradicate the cheating before we can repair the system.

      So many other sports have it all sorted, but the administrators of football continue to hide behind closed doors and bury their head in the sand !
      GERNS
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 12,343 posts | 1529 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #497: Oct 08, 2023 12:17:23 pm
      Agenda..easily passed off as a 'mistake'. Well wouldn't like to seriously suggest that.

      Can’t think why Harrismo, it’s looking more likely with every incident, and I don’t just mean in our games. 🤷‍♂️
      GERNS
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 12,343 posts | 1529 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #498: Oct 08, 2023 12:22:29 pm
      I would say there are very few calling for VAR to be scrapped. It's a vastly improved 'service' that is required. At the minute it's inconsistent due in part, to slack or casual procedure.

      There has to be uniformity. A very well defined way of the decision making process. So that all concerned are singing from the same hymn sheet. There should be no misunderstanding or miscommunication. The ludicrous muttering of England and Hooper were symptomatic of a slap dash sloppy ill thought out decision making procedure.

      Haven't seen or heard much from PGMOL or the Premier League. No clear statement that indicates they understand what caused the confusion or how they are going to put it right. Banning England from our games is very odd and I would like to be able to hear transcripts of earlier games when England was the VAR ref, especially how he handled on/offside decisions.

      If England was categorised as being below the standards required, he e would clearly be removed from reffing prem games.
      Removing him from LFC games only, suggest PGMOL are aware he has an adgenda against us !
      Harrisimo
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 8,288 posts | 1401 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #499: Oct 08, 2023 12:29:51 pm
      If England was categorised as being below the standards required, he e would clearly be removed from reffing prem games.
      Removing him from LFC games only, suggest PGMOL are aware he has an adgenda against us !

      Possibly. Could be we told the Prem we don't want him anywhere near our games. But if the Prem instructed PGMOL to exclude him from our games then it does throw up a few questions.

      No1  Would be why has Mr.England meekly accepted the order?
      GERNS
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 12,343 posts | 1529 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #500: Oct 08, 2023 03:59:05 pm
      Possibly. Could be we told the Prem we don't want him anywhere near our games. But if the Prem instructed PGMOL to exclude him from our games then it does throw up a few questions.

      No1  Would be why has Mr.England meekly accepted the order?

      Keeps a low profile now. Job done !
      FL Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 31,331 posts | 6386 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #501: Oct 08, 2023 04:50:36 pm
      ConzS
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 4,372 posts | 1030 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #502: Oct 08, 2023 05:04:49 pm
      The gift that keeps on giving. Kovacic escapes a red card for City for a challenge not at all dissimilar to Jones’ last week. As with Jones, an attempt to play the ball where the follow through led to studs in to the leg, yellow card onfield decision and VAR looks at…. Not a clear and obvious error. It’s the inconsistency.
      saille29
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 2,544 posts | 243 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #503: Oct 08, 2023 05:04:51 pm
      Kovacic foul in the arse v shitty game goes to VAR why no instruction for the ref to go to monitor and see a still of what looks like an horrific challenge?
      Complete inconsistenty in applying the rules
      Frankly, Mr Shankly
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 4,062 posts | 2110 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #504: Oct 08, 2023 05:08:05 pm
      Michael Oliver mindful of that pay packet he received from UAE over a week ago by waiving away a red card against Kovacic. There'd be no more trips to UAE if he had given that red against City.

      Shameful. Someone tell me how going to UAE and picking up a wage from City's owners is not a conflict of interest? There may not be an explicit deal between Oliver and UAE that says 'I'll give you 10k to officiate in UAE in return for going easy and influencing decisions in City's favour.' No, it's more sly than that. It's Olivet's thought process being corrupted in the sense of 'These UAE guys were really kind to me, I can't jeopardise my good pally relationship and those nice trips out to UAE by giving their man a red card here.'

      That the FA and Webb think it's OK is disgusting. Collusion, bribery, conflict of interest - call it what it is. Just by words for corruption
      ConzS
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 4,372 posts | 1030 
      Re: Is English officiating corrupt?
      Reply #505: Oct 08, 2023 05:08:34 pm
      Followed up by another terrible challenge. Jota and Jones both got sent off for less than what Kovacic has done in the last 10 minutes.

      Quick Reply