Trending Topics

      Next match: v [] Thu 1st Jan @ 1:00 am

      Today is the 24th of May and on this date LFC's match record is P14 W9 D1 L4

      Chelsea

      Read 407367 times
      0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.
      HScRed1
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 20,228 posts | 4421 
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2737: Oct 14, 2016 11:48:41 am
      You can easily break these contracts, they are leaving their current contract with Adidas 3 years early.

      The thing is that if they are getting £60 million then we need our sponsor to match that or f**k off, there is no doubt that the stock of Liverpool FC is on the rise, especially with Klopp at the helm.

      Not sure it's all that easy there would be a penalty to pay a bit like if you pay off your mortgage early.
       
      I wish!!

      heimdall
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 13,818 posts | 2724 
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2738: Oct 14, 2016 11:53:29 am
      Not sure it's all that easy there would be a penalty to pay a bit like if you pay off your mortgage early.
       
      I wish!!



      Its normally by mutual agreement, for example Chelsea saying to Adidas "We want the same as you give Manure" and Adidas saying "F**k off you cockney wankers, no way not happening", then them parting company. :-)
      RedPuppy
      • Still European.
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 19,258 posts | 2856 
      • Parum Rutilus Canis: Illegitimi non carborundum
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2739: Oct 14, 2016 12:47:41 pm
      I wonder what Nike would give us?
      FL Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 31,423 posts | 6420 
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2740: Oct 14, 2016 01:22:15 pm
      I wonder what Nike would give us?

      I bet a hell of a lot more than New Balance does. But John Henry isn't in bed with Nike so......
      RedPuppy
      • Still European.
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 19,258 posts | 2856 
      • Parum Rutilus Canis: Illegitimi non carborundum
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2741: Oct 14, 2016 01:25:26 pm
      I bet a hell of a lot more than New Balance does. But John Henry isn't in bed with Nike so......

      True, but I thought it was all about the $, the $ the $?
      FL Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 31,423 posts | 6420 
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2742: Oct 14, 2016 02:59:17 pm
      True, but I thought it was all about the $, the $ the $?

      I wouldn't be surprised if  NB and FSG have some sort of deal where  in the end, it works out better for FSG to use NB for Liverpool. I think they outfit the Red Sox too...so he'd probably lose that deal if he were to tell NB to  take a hike for Liverpool.

      Kind of sucks because I think Nike would really come up with some nice kits for us.
      RedPuppy
      • Still European.
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 19,258 posts | 2856 
      • Parum Rutilus Canis: Illegitimi non carborundum
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2743: Oct 14, 2016 03:21:27 pm


      Kind of sucks because I think Nike would really come up with some nice kits for us.

      Maybe they could, but I can't stand Nike, just my personal preference.
      stuey
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 36,041 posts | 3966 
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2744: Oct 14, 2016 04:37:54 pm
      True, but I thought it was all about the $, the $ the $?

      As FL Red implied JWH&Co, NB, Red Sox and whoever else is on the gravy train are all looking at how much they can make on the back of LFC with the least outlay possible.
      The long term interests of LFC run a poor second.
      stuey
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 36,041 posts | 3966 
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2745: Oct 14, 2016 04:41:45 pm

      Maybe they could, but I can't stand Nike, just my personal preference.

      Nike or JWH&Co?
      Nike over the long term would probably sink more dosh into the club if they sponsored, than the owners.
      RedPuppy
      • Still European.
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 19,258 posts | 2856 
      • Parum Rutilus Canis: Illegitimi non carborundum
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2746: Oct 14, 2016 05:41:54 pm
      Nike or JWH&Co?
      Nike over the long term would probably sink more dosh into the club if they sponsored, than the owners.


      Nike, I just don't like them, great kits yes, but not for me.
      RedPuppy
      • Still European.
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 19,258 posts | 2856 
      • Parum Rutilus Canis: Illegitimi non carborundum
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2747: Oct 14, 2016 05:42:21 pm
      As FL Red implied JWH&Co, NB, Red Sox and whoever else is on the gravy train are all looking at how much they can make on the back of LFC with the least outlay possible.
      The long term interests of LFC run a poor second.

      He has made a very valid point.
      bmck
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 9,605 posts | 1683 
      • YNWA
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2748: Dec 11, 2016 12:14:53 pm
      clint_call01
      • King Live Match Starter
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 11,727 posts | 3741 
      • Ynwa... lfc till I die !
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2749: Dec 11, 2016 12:57:22 pm

      I wish it but it would be so unfair. They did not cheat or paid money to cheat.
      AussieRed
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 20,882 posts | 6816 
      • You'll Never Walk Alone
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2750: Dec 12, 2016 09:35:26 am
      F***ing why can't Costa get injured or suspended for 6 weeks?

      They would be fu**ed if he did.
      HScRed1
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 20,228 posts | 4421 
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2751: Dec 13, 2016 05:15:56 pm
      And we couldn't get some stupid Chinese team to spend half the amount on Balotelli....

      https://twitter.com/guardian_sport/status/808718260497776640
      heimdall
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 13,818 posts | 2724 
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2752: Dec 13, 2016 06:59:52 pm
      When I watched City vs Chelsea I did notice how organised they are in defence, they kept dropping back to a 5 and I haven't seen a straighter line in a long time, that along with pace up front makes them so difficult to play against.

      I agree they are without doubt the best team at the moment, lets just hope something happens to derail them, something like Hazard or Costa getting injured otherwise I don't see anyone beating them this year.
      Gill95
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,664 posts | 491 
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2753: Dec 14, 2016 12:48:41 pm
      I agree they are without doubt the best team at the moment, lets just hope something happens to derail them, something like Hazard or Costa getting injured otherwise I don't see anyone beating them this year.
      Wait for them to come to Anfield. You'll see the difference. Give it a fair few matches, you'll see the wheels falling off. A bad patch will come for everyone with the exception being that of the "The invincibles" season.

      We were unbeaten for 3 and a half months, everyone was raving about us.

      City won 6 in a row in the beginning, everyone thought that they would walk the league.

      Now Chelsea are having an amazing run, everyone thinks they would walk the league.
      Dadorious
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 9,882 posts | 1545 
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2754: Dec 15, 2016 06:46:11 am
      Fukn save by courtouis in the 93 minute to deny Sunderland a certain point.

      cu*ts
      heimdall
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 13,818 posts | 2724 
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2755: Dec 15, 2016 09:08:02 am
      They are looking good at the moment, but after the game at Boro we've now got our mojo back. Sooner or later Chelsea have to hit a sticky patch just like we've just had. The more I look at it the more I think we have a good shout at the title but even if we don't make it we should comfortably be able to get top 4 this year.
      what-a-hit-son
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 16,506 posts | 4850 
      • t: @MrPrice1979 i: @klmprice101518
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2756: Dec 15, 2016 12:23:52 pm
      They are looking good at the moment, but after the game at Boro we've now got our mojo back. Sooner or later Chelsea have to hit a sticky patch just like we've just had. The more I look at it the more I think we have a good shout at the title but even if we don't make it we should comfortably be able to get top 4 this year.

      They're really dependant on Costa in my opinion. I know I shouldn't say it as I know its not nice and I like the player as he is excellent  but I hope he gets injured. Not a nasty one, obviously, but if he could just severely snap his banjo or something and have a six week lay off I think they will struggle to do what they are doing now.
      Kopite78
      • Guest
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2757: Dec 15, 2016 12:27:53 pm
      They're really dependant on Costa in my opinion. I know I shouldn't say it as I know its not nice and I like the player as he is excellent  but I hope he gets injured. Not a nasty one, obviously, but if he could just severely snap his banjo or something and have a six week lay off I think they will struggle to do what they are doing now.

      Banjo?

      Is that the bit of skin that attaches the foreskin to the bellend?

      Of all the injuries to give the boy

       :sadlook:
      RedWilly
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****
      • Started Topic

      • 9,213 posts | 1646 
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2758: Dec 15, 2016 02:10:18 pm
      Banjo?

      Is that the bit of skin that attaches the foreskin to the bellend?

      Of all the injuries to give the boy

       :sadlook:

      He doesn't wish him a bad one though like!
      heimdall
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 13,818 posts | 2724 
      Re: Chelsea
      Reply #2759: Dec 17, 2016 02:11:36 pm
      I know Palace are a bit sh*t but Chelsea look frighteningly good at the moment, rock solid in defence and very fluid and dynamic in attack.

      Quick Reply