And in this ideal scenario, if VVD is out of appeals by the 98th minute, what then? Will you accept the ref's call? No you won't, you'll still tell him he was wrong, and therefore the whole game is corrupt. Which it isn't.

VVD had his chance to appeal the incident at the time, but decided not to. One player made half an appeal but nobody else, not even those closest to the incident. Only after the game did the appeals come, which is too late at that stage.

Every time City have a penalty appeal, which is regularly, there is at least 3-4 of their players around the ref demanding he give it, even if it's debatable. So when the ref caves in, it won't be overturned. That's the difference.

You can only review a subjective incident on the monitor where the evidence from every possible angle, shows that the original decision on the pitch is clearly wrong, which is relatively rare. If every incident had to be reviewed, the game would last as long as NFL. Now I don't care how long it takes to get the right decision as justice is timeless, but most people would soon get fed up of 20 reviews of various incidents on a monitor per game, and so would you. 

Was he a divvy 

Not great from Pakistan..all out 157. Some top spin from Rashid. Good LFC fan Moen Ali chipping in as well. But 158 to win. Not a walk in the park but should be reachable.

If you can get a profit I think ypu do it. Like you said, really good player when healthy. But that's the kind of guy we need to break away from. We won a lot of trophies with guys like Gini, Bobby, and Mily. Dependable, present, and always down to do a job

Nothing new then. 🤦‍♂️  I read it on the sky app.