Trending Topics

      Next match: West Ham v LFC [Premier League] Sat 27th Apr @ 12:30 pm - Pre Match Topic
      London Stadium

      Today is the 27th of April and on this date LFC's match record is P29 W13 D5 L11

      Your wackiest user-rating reason!

      Read 26483 times
      0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
      RedWilly
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 9,197 posts | 1641 
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #184: Jul 27, 2010 11:30:38 pm
      I recieved a neg today with the reason as'...' What the F**k is that all about!!!
      crouchinho
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 42,508 posts | 2620 
      • TU TA LOUCO? FILHO DA PUTA!
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #185: Jul 28, 2010 07:26:32 am
      Had one of those a couple weeks ago.
      Roddenberry
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 16,568 posts | 1876 
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #186: Jul 28, 2010 11:29:38 am
      Could not agree more. Dont mind the neg but ffs give a valid reason and a name would be nice to debate via pm,mind you how can you debate via pm when the negg mister sends you pm then blocks your pm,childish.

      You said you didn't want to discuss it further so I made sure you could stick to that.  I gave you a VALID reason for giving it to you, you just disagreed & negged me back.  I used to, if possible put my name on negs, its your childish actions that have stopped me from doing so in future.
      shabbadoo
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 29,438 posts | 4582 
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #187: Jul 28, 2010 03:00:26 pm
      You said you didn't want to discuss it further so I made sure you could stick to that.  I gave you a VALID reason for giving it to you, you just disagreed & negged me back.  I used to, if possible put my name on negs, its your childish actions that have stopped me from doing so in future.

      Grow up son! Obviousley you still got the hump about something.I negged you for being a tit and for the lack of evidence which you never produced.
      Reslivo
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****
      • Started Topic

      • 14,490 posts | 521 
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #188: Jul 28, 2010 03:01:57 pm
      I would facepalm, but I feel headbutting my wall would be more effective.

      Calm down, children.
      Roddenberry
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 16,568 posts | 1876 
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #189: Jul 28, 2010 03:14:00 pm
      Grow up son! Obviousley you still got the hump about something.I negged you for being a tit and for the lack of evidence which you never produced.

      As I stated, I didn't find the posts about the subject objectionable, even though I have and think I'm allowed to have a different view point. I read what I thought was a bad post, and that is what I negged you for, a bad post, you moaning about your lot and not continuing what was otherwise a good debate.  I enjoyed the debate but you crying like a girl over a neg was unnecessary in that thread, when we actually have a thread for in which you can moan about negs and you detracted from the debate you were involved in.
      « Last Edit: Jul 28, 2010 03:19:19 pm by Roddenberry »
      7-King Kenny-7
      • Lives on Sesame Street
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 44,014 posts | 5760 
      • You'll Never Walk Alone!
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #190: Jul 28, 2010 03:18:11 pm
      Give it a rest lads.
      bigvYNWA
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 16,795 posts | 994 
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #191: Jul 29, 2010 03:05:50 am

      Look at Mr New Staffy Staffster being all Staffy and breaking up the little tiffs. You love it don't ya :D

      Seriously though, arguments like that are made for PM's. Just keep it above board and save any bans having to be handed out.

      I still have not worked out who my secret admirer + was from :laugh:
      crouchinho
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 42,508 posts | 2620 
      • TU TA LOUCO? FILHO DA PUTA!
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #192: Jul 29, 2010 03:47:18 am
      Admirer? Your dreamin'! :D
      bigvYNWA
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 16,795 posts | 994 
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #193: Jul 29, 2010 01:53:33 pm

      Not at all - they struck again! :D
      dodgy
      • Forum Ian St John
      • ***

      • 426 posts | 14 
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #194: Jul 29, 2010 02:05:30 pm
      Looks like someone has 2 accounts and keeps + himself  ;) :roll:






      Damn i wish i had thought of that









      bigvYNWA
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 16,795 posts | 994 
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #195: Jul 29, 2010 02:18:48 pm
      Hardy-F***ing-har :roll:

      ;)
      kb2x
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,841 posts | 215 
      • #WeComeNotToPlay
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #196: Jul 29, 2010 06:08:58 pm
      carheex called me a c**t - nice one.
      Reslivo
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****
      • Started Topic

      • 14,490 posts | 521 
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #197: Jul 29, 2010 06:17:06 pm
      carheex called me a c**t - nice one.

      You cannot be sure of who it was.

      I will say this, though. Whoever starts abusing the user-ratings system WILL be banned without hesitation.

      Let this be a warning to anyone who even thinks about doing so.
      IrishRed_IO
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 5,483 posts | 343 
      • Formerly InertObject
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #198: Jul 29, 2010 07:20:45 pm
      Look at Mr New Staffy Staffster being all Staffy and breaking up the little tiffs. You love it don't ya :D

      Seriously though, arguments like that are made for PM's. Just keep it above board and save any bans having to be handed out.

      I still have not worked out who my secret admirer + was from :laugh:

      I think one of them was from me :laugh:

      InertObject (+28/-3)     bigvYNWA (+197/-17)     +     You wascaly wabbit ;) Secwet admiwer     In topic     June 30, 2010, 11:29:37 AM
      7-King Kenny-7
      • Lives on Sesame Street
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 44,014 posts | 5760 
      • You'll Never Walk Alone!
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #199: Jul 30, 2010 12:03:00 am
      Look at Mr New Staffy Staffster being all Staffy and breaking up the little tiffs. You love it don't ya :D


      For sure



      ;)
      dodgy
      • Forum Ian St John
      • ***

      • 426 posts | 14 
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #200: Jul 30, 2010 01:19:19 pm
      carheex called me a c**t - nice one.

      That made me smile for some weird reason
      kb2x
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,841 posts | 215 
      • #WeComeNotToPlay
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #201: Jul 30, 2010 01:20:45 pm
      That made me smile for some weird reason

      Made me chucle too...
      RedLFCBlood
      • Guest
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #202: Aug 02, 2010 02:47:11 am
      I got a neg saying I was "Unfaithful to Roy"

      I found it rather amusing as I never knew I was F***ing him, must be that baggy arl wrinkly arsehole of his. ;D
      IrishRed_IO
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 5,483 posts | 343 
      • Formerly InertObject
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #203: Aug 03, 2010 01:50:02 pm
      I got a neg saying I was "Unfaithful to Roy"

      I found it rather amusing as I never knew I was f**king him, must be that baggy arl wrinkly arsehole of his. ;D

      Could be his chins, could act as love handles. :whip:
      bigvYNWA
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 16,795 posts | 994 
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #204: Aug 03, 2010 01:53:59 pm
      I think one of them was from me :laugh:

      InertObject (+28/-3)     bigvYNWA (+197/-17)     +     You wascaly wabbit ;) Secwet admiwer     In topic     June 30, 2010, 11:29:37 AM

      Haha! :laugh: That explains it then - but who was the other one then? :D
      Reslivo
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****
      • Started Topic

      • 14,490 posts | 521 
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #205: Aug 03, 2010 02:02:58 pm
      Apparently I know F**k all about football for calling Villa sh*t in comparison to Torres ;)

      Shame I know who it is!

      User-ratings are intended to be for judging the quality of one's posts - not the content. Get a grip fella.
      IrishRed_IO
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 5,483 posts | 343 
      • Formerly InertObject
      Re: Your wackiest user-rating reason!
      Reply #206: Aug 03, 2010 03:33:45 pm
      Hidden (+/-)     InertObject (+30/-4)     -     G     In topic     Today at 01:58:42 PM

      Ok G is the reason I got a neg? It's clearly from The Famous Kopite for this post regarding Robbie Keane.

      First of all Parry brought him in. And when he played he wasn't up to scratch, so no.

      A neg purely because he doesn't agree with me, childish if you ask me. I won't give a revenge neg as I'm better than that. Now saying that if it wasn't TFK who negged me I apologise but I had replied to something he had said and then got a neg.

      At least leave your name for f**k sake and don't be a stupid immature coward.

      Quick Reply