Well at least you admit it all be it in a sardonic way I'm sure if/when your times comes when you get a new owner you won't be complaining at spunking a few million...(( or 100 ))... away fitting into a new side.
I honestly couldn't care less whether we spend 10million or 100million. As far as I'm concerned the money is irrelevant because as you Mancs have proven so well, you can spend 90mill on one player alone and he will still turn out to be sh*t. Quite often the cheaper players are actually the ones who have the greater impact.
So yeah for me, I am much more interested in signing the right player rather than the wrong player just to try and flex financial muscle.
If we spend 100million I won't complain and if we spend 10mill I won't complain so long as the money spent is spent effectively and not just thrown away.
You Mancs spent hundreds of millions over the last few years, yet your best signing was a free transfer and have next to nothing to show for all that money spent.
We've spent a fair amount of money on defenders yet Matip seems to be the best one we have made and he was a free transfer.
It's all about the quality of the money being spent, not quantity of it.
Logged