I have to take issue with the amount of criticism that is being thrown at Glen and Martin. The way we play, we usually end up with what looks like a 2-1-4-3 formation when in possession:
Skrtel Sakho
Gerrard
Johno Lucas Allen Flano
Sturridge Suarez Sterling
Johno and Flano are encouraged (and expected) to get forward and provide attacking width, but this ultimately leaves us incredibly exposed to quick counter attacks. If we hadn't been pushing for goals, goals, and more goals against Palace then Johno could have saved his energy and done a better job of defending..... but we wanted more. He was urged forward by the manager, fans, and his teammates and for 70 minutes he did a great job, but then he ran out of steam. I said while watching the game that we should have subbed Glen off around the 70 minute mark, not because he is a poor player nor was he having a bad game, but because he was completely knackered after running the length of the pitch for 70 straight minutes. Their goals came at a time when they had fresh legs running at our tired fullbacks. Had we shut up shop when we went 3-0 up then we would have won comfortably, but the intention was to push on and score more. For that reason I believe that our defenders are not solely responsible for the goals scored. Part of the blame needs to fall on BR for not changing the tactics, and part of it also needs to be apportioned to the midfielders for not providing more cover/support for our defenders who were outnumbered too often and too easily in the closing minutes. Could Johno & Skrtel have done better? Perhaps, but it is a team game and we shouldn't hang two lads out to dry when there are plenty of others who could have done more to prevent the goals and protect the lead.
Logged