Login

      Trending Topics

      Next match: LFC v Spurs [Premier League] Sun 5th May @ 4:30 pm
      Anfield

      Today is the 28th of April and on this date LFC's match record is P27 W14 D8 L5

      1 2  All   Go

      Fernando Torres (Man City)

      Read 5512 times
      0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
      JerilKuruvila
      • Forum Matt Busby
      • **

      • 134 posts | 1 
      Re: Fernando Torres (Man City)
      → Reply #23: Nov 30, 2009 11:23:42 am
      Reply
      Logged
      Volle
      • Forum Emlyn Hughes
      • ****

      • 770 posts | 8 
      • Champions 2019/20
      Re: Fernando Torres (Man City)
      → Reply #24: Nov 30, 2009 12:00:42 pm
      Christian Purslow said : We will not sell Torres for 100 million and not for 200 million. Hughes : Take some pills and go to bed. Leave the football stuff to someone else.
      Reply
      Logged
      noggin
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,868 posts | 165 
      Re: Fernando Torres (Man City)
      → Reply #25: Nov 30, 2009 01:01:43 pm
      Why would Torres go to a club who wont make top 4 unlike the mighty reds,more chance of Hughes getting the boot,all that money and still a team of misfits.
      Reply
      Logged
      Christ
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,209 posts | 40 
      Re: Fernando Torres (Man City)
      → Reply #26: Nov 30, 2009 02:30:08 pm
      why is this not locked?
      Reply
      Logged
      Eem
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 6,018 posts | 89 
      Re: Fernando Torres (Man City)
      → Reply #27: Nov 30, 2009 04:12:38 pm
      :lmao:
      Reply
      Logged
      macca8
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 5,258 posts | 83 
      • If you can't love us, then fear us!
      Re: Fernando Torres (Man City)
      → Reply #28: Nov 30, 2009 04:18:01 pm
      Quote from RedLFCBlood on Nov 30, 2009 09:50:19 am
      Can we not chuck some oil of ulay on Voronin and give him a haircut and try and blag them ?
      Plus he has to find a girl with name at least the same with Torres missus...
      Reply
      Logged
      RedLFCBlood
      • Guest
      Re: Fernando Torres (Man City)
      → Reply #29: Nov 30, 2009 04:24:31 pm
      $100 trillion dollars

      Reply
      Logged
      stuey
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 36,009 posts | 3953 
      Re: Fernando Torres (Man City)
      → Reply #30: Nov 30, 2009 05:10:35 pm
      Reply
      Logged
      Magillionare
      • Official LFC Reds Sig Maker. Lives on Sesame Street.
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 14,918 posts | 2381 
      • Hold on a minute, John Wayne hasn't arrived yet.
      Re: Fernando Torres (Man City)
      → Reply #31: Nov 30, 2009 05:12:31 pm
      When will they learn...
      Reply
      Logged
      RedLFCBlood
      • Guest
      Re: Fernando Torres (Man City)
      → Reply #32: Nov 30, 2009 05:15:07 pm
      When their mega rich sheik decides to F**k off and has a fire sale of all their ermmmmmmmm overpriced footballers recoups some of his intial outlay and then they get relegated. :D
      Reply
      Logged
      bgwdivemaster
      • Forum Kevin Keegan
      • ***

      • 357 posts | 2 
      Re: Fernando Torres (Man City)
      → Reply #33: Nov 30, 2009 08:41:09 pm
      Good luck getting our Nando ;D
      Reply
      Logged
      chats
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 31,384 posts | 2823 
      Re: Fernando Torres (Man City)
      → Reply #34: Nov 30, 2009 08:48:17 pm
      Quote from macca8 on Nov 29, 2009 08:27:43 pm
      Note to the sheikhs:

      Don't buy Torres, sell Man City and buy Liverpool ;D!

      It'll be a cheaper way for them to get Torres. ;)

      Torres will not play for another English team, I am 99.99% sure of that.
      Reply
      Logged
      redkenny
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 24,912 posts | 1058 
      • 97 - Always Remembered
      Re: Fernando Torres (Man City)
      → Reply #35: Nov 30, 2009 08:54:40 pm
      Threads in here are supposed to be started with a link.

      Locked.
      Reply
      Logged
      1 2  All   Go
      « previous topic next topic »

      Quick Reply