Trending Topics

      Next match: Chester v LFC [Friendly] Sat 7th Jul @ 3:00 pm
      Swansay Chester Stadium

      Today is the 24th of June and on this date LFC's match record is P0 W0 D0 L0

      Doctor Who

      Read 5909 times
      0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
      stuey
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 32,546 posts | 2759 
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #30: Aug 30, 2014 11:34:26 am

      A backwards step? In the last couple of years the show has exploded on the international market, they were going round the globe doing world premieres. It's the biggest role up for grabs on British TV.

      It's by far the biggest role of Capaldi's career and the only move upward is to lead a multi-million dollar US show like a Breaking Bad/Walking Dead level or become a movie star. To most of the world this is his first exposure. This aint the Tom Baker days anymore.

      Also, from what I hear he is a big fan of the show.


      I know the show has a cult following and all that goes with that statement.
      Mine is a personal take and it puzzles the hell out of me how adults rave about it - again a personal view.
      Having said that the addition of a thespian of Capaldi's status to the cast is a real surprise.
      Having seen an interview with Peter Capaldi discussing the role I get the impression he does have reservations himself, body language, guarded replies and generally looking a little uncomfortable in comparison to other interviews left me with that opinion.
      If he does more than one series it will be a shock.
      heimdall
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 5,771 posts | 961 
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #31: Aug 30, 2014 11:35:31 am
      I liked the look of Capaldi as the Doctor and think he'll be excellent but the whole time I was expecting him to go into a full on expletive laden rant ala The thick of it  ;D
      unwashedmasses
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,369 posts | 53 
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #32: Aug 30, 2014 11:42:55 am
      I know the show has a cult following and all that goes with that statement.
      Mine is a personal take and it puzzles the hell out of me how adults rave about it - again a personal view.
      Having said that the addition of a thespian of Capaldi's status to the cast is a real surprise.
      Having seen an interview with Peter Capaldi discussing the role I get the impression he does have reservations himself, body language, guarded replies and generally looking a little uncomfortable in comparison to other interviews left me with that opinion.
      If he does more than one series it will be a shock.


      Oh this seems a little defensive, as I guess mine did, I can see how I came off a bit aggressive, so apologies.

      I was just meaning to say it's no longer a cult thing, it's become a huge international franchise in the last couple of years.
      stuey
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 32,546 posts | 2759 
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #33: Aug 30, 2014 12:54:38 pm
      Oh this seems a little defensive, as I guess mine did, I can see how I came off a bit aggressive, so apologies.

      I was just meaning to say it's no longer a cult thing, it's become a huge international franchise in the last couple of years.

      Haha no worries mate, that's what just getting off the Current Affairs does for you, still got my serious head on.
      unwashedmasses
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,369 posts | 53 
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #34: Aug 30, 2014 02:08:21 pm
      Haha no worries mate, that's what just getting off the Current Affairs does for you, still got my serious head on.

      Lol I try to stay off there for my sanity hahaha
      Son Of A Gun
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 5,131 posts | 1250 
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #35: Aug 31, 2014 01:30:35 am
      Same as mate but after Tom Baker and Pertwee l lost interest and don't think watched another episode, maybe because the theme was too repetitive and juvenile - or maybe the ale, women and buses into town in no particular order distracted me.
      Having followed Capaldi from his early appearances in that comedy hospital show Getting On with Jo Brand which was excellent, then his serious dramatic roles, it was something of a surprise to hear he had been cast as Dr Who!
      Surely a backward step in his career or perhaps offers of work are thin on the ground, which would be surprising.



      Its got a massive international market and makes shitloads for the BBC, just like Top Gear - that's globalisation for you.

      Becoming Doctor Who has pretty much made Peter Capaldi the most recognised BBC star world wide along with Clarkson, Hammond and May. Pretty much funds the BBC these days along with Top Gear.
      stuey
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 32,546 posts | 2759 
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #36: Aug 31, 2014 07:50:45 am
      Its got a massive international market and makes shitloads for the BBC, just like Top Gear - that's globalisation for you.

      Becoming Doctor Who has pretty much made Peter Capaldi the most recognised BBC star world wide along with Clarkson, Hammond and May. Pretty much funds the BBC these days along with Top Gear.

      Having seen Capaldi in several critically acclaimed productions, his subsequent appearance in Dr Who does require an amount dumbing-down on the part of anyone who has followed the actor's career.
      To put his name in the same sentence as that buffoon Clarkson is a professional slight.
      As you point out 'tho Dave the show does have a global fan base and the benefits to the actor's career are obvious, if you are into it Capaldi can only acquit himself well in the role.       
      « Last Edit: Aug 31, 2014 09:18:52 am by stuey »
      unwashedmasses
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,369 posts | 53 
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #37: Aug 31, 2014 09:44:37 am
      Having seen Capaldi in several critically acclaimed productions, his subsequent appearance in Dr Who does require an amount dumbing-down on the part of anyone who has followed the actor's career.
      To put his name in the same sentence as that buffoon Clarkson is a professional slight.
      As you point out 'tho Dave the show does have a global fan base and the benefits to the actor's career are obvious, if you are into it Capaldi can only acquit himself well in the role.       

      Depends what you mean by dumbing down, I found the Thick of It to be awful. He's been in some other good stuff though. Moffat's writing is actually quite complex for a prime time, family orientated TV show as well, it's getting acknowledged as such too. When was the last time you watched the show? Not that it's for everyone but you seem to be critiquing the current product based of your knowledge of the old?

      Clarkson is a c**t though.
      stuey
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 32,546 posts | 2759 
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #38: Aug 31, 2014 10:02:03 am
      Depends what you mean by dumbing down, I found the Thick of It to be awful. He's been in some other good stuff though. Moffat's writing is actually quite complex for a prime time, family orientated TV show as well, it's getting acknowledged as such too. When was the last time you watched the show? Not that it's for everyone but you seem to be critiquing the current product based of your knowledge of the old?

      Clarkson is a c**t though.

      Haven't watched it for decades, not really into sci-fi per se and the repetitive nature of it (sci-fi) is probably the main reason for the lack of interest.
      Some of course is really entertaining - Blade Runner comes to mind and Space Odyssey, shows how out of touch I am, but I have seen loads of the recent stuff 'cos the kids and my good lady wife are into it and some does come over as infantile and a variation on a theme.
      For me that's how Dr Who interprets - infantile and a variation on a theme.

      unwashedmasses
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,369 posts | 53 
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #39: Aug 31, 2014 12:32:45 pm
      Haven't watched it for decades, not really into sci-fi per se and the repetitive nature of it (sci-fi) is probably the main reason for the lack of interest.
      Some of course is really entertaining - Blade Runner comes to mind and Space Odyssey, shows how out of touch I am, but I have seen loads of the recent stuff 'cos the kids and my good lady wife are into it and some does come over as infantile and a variation on a theme.
      For me that's how Dr Who interprets - infantile and a variation on a theme.



      Fair enough. Variation on a theme? Isn't that every TV show? The David Tennant years were very infantile.

      The Matt Smith ones were more double edged with proper story arcs and the frothy campness of it all became punctuated by a growing darker side.

      The two episodes in this season have expanded upon them darker elements.



      stuey
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 32,546 posts | 2759 
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #40: Aug 31, 2014 01:03:59 pm
      Fair enough. Variation on a theme? Isn't that every TV show? The David Tennant years were very infantile.

      The Matt Smith ones were more double edged with proper story arcs and the frothy campness of it all became punctuated by a growing darker side.

      The two episodes in this season have expanded upon them darker elements.

      You're obviously into it whereas it has a minus attention span rating for me, it's horses and courses mate and if it gives you enjoyment fairy muff.

      unwashedmasses
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,369 posts | 53 
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #41: Aug 31, 2014 01:10:53 pm
      You're obviously into it whereas it has a minus attention span rating for me, it's horses and courses mate and if it gives you enjoyment fairy muff.



      I guess I'm bored this morning in particular too, waiting for the game!
      stuey
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 32,546 posts | 2759 
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #42: Aug 31, 2014 03:22:55 pm
      I guess I'm bored this morning in particular too, waiting for the game!

      Well worth waiting for it was.
      Ribapuru
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 8,043 posts | 734 
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #43: Aug 31, 2014 07:01:06 pm

      A backwards step? In the last couple of years the show has exploded on the international market, they were going round the globe doing world premieres. It's the biggest role up for grabs on British TV.

      It's by far the biggest role of Capaldi's career and the only move upward is to lead a multi-million dollar US show like a Breaking Bad/Walking Dead level or become a movie star. To most of the world this is his first exposure. This aint the Tom Baker days anymore.

      Also, from what I hear he is a big fan of the show.
      Have to agree to an extent. Not that many people knew who David Tennant was before he was in Dr Who and now he's played many roles in movies. It is a backwards step for Dr Who to have an older dr. I thought the recent younger doctors were better and they should have continued with that. I'm not totally convinced on Capaldi being the doctor either. I have not seem the usual charisma from the recent dr that has made him so popular. It kind of felt slightly stale watching the new series. I think it is important to play the DR well. It is a role that can make or break an acting career.
      RedPuppy
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 16,833 posts | 1498 
      • Parum Rutilus Canis: Illegitimi non carborundum
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #44: Sep 06, 2014 07:57:21 pm
      Spoiler Alert. It's crap.
      RC9
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****
      • Started Topic

      • 7,992 posts | 186 
      • Formerly known as Vtorres, Vsuarez, and Vsterling.
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #45: Sep 06, 2014 10:06:42 pm

      Disagree.

      Enjoyed the episode, the banter between the Dr and Robin Hood was funny and their relationship devolved well in the episode.
      RedPuppy
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 16,833 posts | 1498 
      • Parum Rutilus Canis: Illegitimi non carborundum
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #46: Sep 06, 2014 10:18:06 pm
      Disagree.

      Enjoyed the episode, the banter between the Dr and Robin Hood was funny and their relationship devolved well in the episode.


      I just don't get it any more. The story lines are so thin for me. Since David Tenant got his claws into the part and his style of acting, with all the woos and arhs.

      The graphics/CGI seems so heavily relied upon.

      I really think they need new writers.

      RC9
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****
      • Started Topic

      • 7,992 posts | 186 
      • Formerly known as Vtorres, Vsuarez, and Vsterling.
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #47: Sep 06, 2014 10:21:10 pm
      I just don't get it any more. The story lines are so thin for me. Since David Tenant got his claws into the part and his style of acting, with all the woos and arhs.

      The graphics/CGI seems so heavily relied upon.

      I really think try need new writers.



      Oh don't get me wrong I think the show has dipped since Russell T Davies departure.

      I reckon Matt Smith under him writing would have excelled. Steven Moffat just doesn't cut it for me on the less important episodes, the ones that keep the season interesting.

      But I still have to watch it, and I am sure a couple of great episodes will turn up sooner or later.
      RedPuppy
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 16,833 posts | 1498 
      • Parum Rutilus Canis: Illegitimi non carborundum
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #48: Sep 06, 2014 10:44:12 pm
      I still watch it, but it's just noise in the back ground.

      There seems no boundaries to the story line, anything is possible and probable.

      Christopher Ecclestone was good, dispite him being a manc, since he left, it's just lost its way.
      unwashedmasses
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,369 posts | 53 
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #49: Sep 07, 2014 12:03:08 am
      Well that was one of the worst episodes I've seen.
      TheShanklyGates
      • Forum Ian St John
      • ***

      • 438 posts |
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #50: Sep 09, 2014 04:10:13 am
      I've not long got into Doctor Who,The Day of The Doctor to be exact. I'm a massive geek/nerd if you want to put a name on it with it superheroes and comic books so why not add the doctor to the collection. I had wanted to watch it for a while and a friend who is a HUGE fan told me that was a good time to start watching so I did and loved it and since then have went back and watched all Christopher Eccleston,David Tennant and Matt Smith episodes along with some classics. Matt Smith is my favourite doctor,probably because it was the first doctor I really watched and knew of properly.

      I've enjoyed Peter Capaldi so far,much darker than previous doctors which I've really liked. Already looking forward to next weeks episode.
      RedPuppy
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • *****
      • 16,833 posts | 1498 
      • Parum Rutilus Canis: Illegitimi non carborundum
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #51: Sep 14, 2014 09:51:04 am
      Much better this time.
      unwashedmasses
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,369 posts | 53 
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #52: Sep 14, 2014 01:28:06 pm
      Yes, much preferred this episode.
      RC9
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****
      • Started Topic

      • 7,992 posts | 186 
      • Formerly known as Vtorres, Vsuarez, and Vsterling.
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #53: Sep 14, 2014 03:43:11 pm
      :D

      I disliked this episode, found it boring to be honest.
      Ribapuru
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 8,043 posts | 734 
      Re: Doctor Who
      Reply #54: Jul 25, 2017 12:47:41 am
      So the Dr and River Song got married, Dr regenerates and is now female. Now what?

      Quick Reply