lucked out in getting Klopp you mean.
Moores could have just as easily got in better marketeers to take advantage of the LFC brand, he only sold on because he wanted somebody else who could invest more into the club.
Of course he sold it to a couple of cowboys but thatās another story.
People seem to forget that FSG have benefited probably more than LFC just look at their valuation as a investment entity now compared to pre LFC.
If it was that easy for Moores then why didnāt he do it ?
And you gloss over H&G when they nearly ruined the club
So FSG buy the club
In the ten years they have owned us - stadium build up , new training facility , world class players , the league title , CL win
We are one of the best teams on the pitch in Europe and one of the best clubs off the pitch
It was done without the need for oil money , bank loans , credit facility or huge owner debt
Would you prefer we were like Man Utd and have huge debt on the club ? Or City and have to rely on owners oil money ?
Would you prefer Abramovich as an owner
Do you support the club for the trophies or for the transfers that are made
So what if the valuation of the club has increased- that should tell you how well the club is run ? Or are you a bit too thick to understand that
Logged