people on here not all but many find your swift responses to every post about FSG quite telling.
Sorry I’m not sure what the protocol is when responding to posts ? Is there a specific time lime
You defend everything about them
I’m sorry but I’m sure I recall walking out of the game at protest of the ticket prices and certainly wasn’t impressed in regards the super league.
but the man I mentioned earlier Bill Shankly would not give them the time of day. He was an honest man a decent man, he would be just baffled at how the club he and his team built from nothing
Let’s be honest here - the game is hugely different to what the game was when Shanks was in charge - it’s a huge commercial business now and I very much doubt Shanks would like anything about the modern game and have anything to do with any modern owners - could you see him being impressed with the oil Billionares - would that sit in with his socialist views ?
other than a distant history ended up a billionaires plaything to do with as they see fit.
I don’t understand the idea they see the club as a plaything ? The club stands on its own financially as a club and day to day run is left to the club with little input from FSG -some are critical of that yet you think they see the club as a plaything ? Surely that’s the sort of thing the oil Billionaires do ?
If you said they see the club as an asset in their sports portfolio then that’s understandable because that’s no doubt what they see
So what sort of owners do you want ?
Right now within the Premiership - it’s dominated by very rich people owning clubs for their gains - whether that be financially or in some ego thing
I don’t believe there are the “perfect” owner who “love the club” and then also spend their own money out of “love” for the club - it’s just not possible in modern football