NESV/Fenway Sports Group: Owners of LFC

Imagine having to bring on Milner and Matip when we are chasing the game.

Thanks Fenway, bunch of cu*ts.

As is known ... I'm no fan of fsg. They are greedy c*nts ... no doubt about it.

But fsg didn't give Gomez a 5 year deal and force Jürgen to keep picking him when he's a total liability, injury prone and so far out of his depth he's now pure comedy.

Matip or Philips would have done a much better job tonight ... because they are better players.

As for Milner ... he should have started at right back. But he didn't ... again ... not down to fsg.

It's not down to fsg that we've got laurel n Hardy at centre back and right back. Jürgen keeps picking them ... and they can't do the job we are paying them a fortune to do.

Klopp today

"The way that this club is led is by not splashing the money. Our transfers always have to be on point. That makes it really tricky," he said.

"We cannot make four transfers before we know who will leave the club and these kind of things.

"Last year was not a season for a big change. We played until the last moment and, if you want to change at this club, we cannot just bring in players and realise later that no-one wants to leave. It doesn't work like that.

We and Klopp can only re build if they fund  it time to find out what they they really think of this club time our owners grew a pair and actually put some fckin funds into this club

Our transfers always have to be on point. That makes it really tricky," he said.

This part for me….

Our transfers always have to be on point. That makes it really tricky," he said.

It does make it really tricky. We don’t really have much room for a bad transfer decision. 

This part for me….

Our transfers always have to be on point. That makes it really tricky," he said.

It does make it really tricky. We don’t really have much room for a bad transfer decision. 

The fact that we have been so good at identifying the right players makes it all the more puzzling. In recent times I can only really think of Keita and Ox as players with a significant outlay who turned out to burden us more than they did benefit the team. Other managers who achieved less made countless bad signings by comparison (yet still had the support of the fans). Why is a better manager not allowed more leeway?

The fact that we have been so good at identifying the right players makes it all the more puzzling. In recent times I can only really think of Keita and Ox as players with a significant outlay who turned out to burden us more than they did benefit the team. Other managers who achieved less made countless bad signings by comparison (yet still had the support of the fans). Why is a better manager not allowed more leeway?

Depends what bad managers you're referring to first?

The fact that we have been so good at identifying the right players makes it all the more puzzling. In recent times I can only really think of Keita and Ox as players with a significant outlay who turned out to burden us more than they did benefit the team. Other managers who achieved less made countless bad signings by comparison (yet still had the support of the fans). Why is a better manager not allowed more leeway?

Ox did well before his injury. But it was obvious he wasn't the same after it and he should have been moved on long ago.

Keita ... bar the odd glimpse has been a disaster. Should have been shipped out 2 years ago and replaced whilst our midfield was still functioning.

Klopp today

This is damning of FSG. Outs before in? Why didn't FSG act earlier while we are on the ascendency? LFC could have an out in Milner but why extend his contract with Lower terms?

No money for new signings?

This is damning of FSG. Outs before in? Why didn't FSG act earlier while we are on the ascendency? LFC could have an out in Milner but why extend his contract with Lower terms?

No money for new signings?

Moneyball!!

https://twitter.com/iandoylesport/status/1630511860981145601?s=46&t=3i2qEmw5MwEb957n6h95sg

Accounts released

The increase in wages is insane, handing out extending contracts and not getting rid of players on big wages.

The increase in wages is insane, handing out extending contracts and not getting rid of players on big wages.

A lot of the increase in wages is down to incentives as well - club doing well , players get more money for performing well


Not sure which players on big wages they should have got rid off - but if you mean Ox and Keita then tough to get rid of players if clubs are looking to buy them

Living within means and not cheating.

And winning stuff.

And Building stuff.

NTB.

If they spend the money that is needed on the team this summer, I'm not sure what anyone can complain about.

Maybe comeback to this thread in August. l o l

The club still owes 159m to (I assume) FSG for infrastructure improvements. Kind of weird when you think about it. FSG own the club and yet instead of paying for the improvements themselves they’ve loaned the money to the club to pay for the improvements. So the value of the club goes up after the improvements, and FSG who directly benefit from that didn’t have to pay a cent. That’s pretty good business if you can get it. Like being a landlord and getting your renter to pay to make your house nicer so when you sell it you will make more.

Shrewd.

The club still owes 159m to (I assume) FSG for infrastructure improvements. Kind of weird when you think about it. FSG own the club and yet instead of paying for the improvements themselves they’ve loaned the money to the club to pay for the improvements. So the value of the club goes up after the improvements, and FSG who directly benefit from that didn’t have to pay a cent. That’s pretty good business if you can get it. Like being a landlord and getting your renter to pay to make your house nicer so when you sell it you will make more.

Shrewd.

Surely this isn’t coming as new news to you 🤷‍♂️



The owners took out a loan to pay for the rebuilding of the stands , the loan was in the owners name , it will prob cost them a little because they took the hit on any interest and set up fees etc

Surely this isn’t coming as new news to you 🤷‍♂️



The owners took out a loan to pay for the rebuilding of the stands , the loan was in the owners name , it will prob cost them a little because they took the hit on any interest and set up fees etc

Forgive me oh Lord of Finance. I didn’t mean to take any focus away from your regularly scheduled program of telling us all how great FSG is.

All hail our hallowed owners!

Forgive me oh Lord of Finance. I didn’t mean to take any focus away from your regularly scheduled program of telling us all how great FSG is.

All hail our hallowed owners!

🤦‍♂️

I have just given you the facts about the debt the owners


If you are going to dribble on about the finances within the club at least learn about the them to stop you looking a pr**k - hard for you I know

🤦‍♂️

I have just given you the facts about the debt the owners


If you are going to dribble on about the finances within the club at least learn about the them to stop you looking a pr**k - hard for you I know

Nothing I said was incorrect. And nothing I said was negative towards the owners. In fact I complemented them on their business acumen. Strange that you immediately took it as an affront and felt the need to personally attack me and attempt to insult me.

The owners took out a loan to pay for the rebuilding of the stands , the loan was in the owners name , it will prob cost them a little because they took the hit on any interest and set up fees etc

The club were hit with the loan and rebuilt the stands, FSG will benefit of course when they eventually sell up and here you are trying to polish sh*te.

Nothing I said was incorrect. And nothing I said was negative towards the owners. In fact I complemented them on their business acumen. Strange that you immediately took it as an affront and felt the need to personally attack me and attempt to insult me.

Where did I say your post was negative to the owners 🤷‍♂️


I was just surprised that you weren’t aware of what the debt was to the owners and how it come about

Maybe you need to read your reply to my post which was full of sarcasm and didn’t really have anything to do with what I posted

“Forgive me oh Lord of Finance. I didn’t mean to take any focus away from your regularly scheduled program of telling us all how great FSG is.

All hail our hallowed owners!”


That’s how you responded to a factual post about what the debt is towards the owners

Maybe you need to have a look at how you respond in future

The club were hit with the loan and rebuilt the stands, FSG will benefit of course when they eventually sell up and here you are trying to polish sh*te.

Again - it’s something we all knew , it’s how they said they would improve the club and is more than any previous owners could achieve

We actually had actions of spades in the ground as opposed to just talk and it will only benefit the club and fans going forward.


The owners have done a very good thing - surprised anyone can find any negative about it

I guess a dilapidated and smaller Anfield would have been a better option......

I guess a dilapidated and smaller Anfield would have been a better option......

Because that is the only other option.