NESV/Fenway Sports Group: Owners of LFC

They merely utilised the status and the history of the brand. That potential was always there, after the fraudulent H&G nearly bankrupt the club FSG put LFC on an even keel.

After the club hemorrhaged money under the frauds FSG got us back on the road to profit, a well appreciated and most welcome state of affairs, not entirely unexpected it must be said considering LFC was always a going concern under legitimate owners.

It is puzzling to say the least that all these commercial bodies are willing to put their company's good name on the LFC brand presumably to increase the status of their product yet the owners do not feel it necessary to fund the brand as JWH stated bringing it further success which translates as more profit.

As a footnote the defeat in the CL final would have been different if the monies had been in place to sign an established world class striker and not wait for the manager to perform miracles.

So that’s your issue? That Jürgen wanted a striker and FSG wouldn’t buy him one?

Ok.....

Scenes in Liverpool when Fekir deal is announced 😎

Scenes in Liverpool when Fekir deal is announced 😎

Never heard of him? 😁

So that’s your issue? That Jürgen wanted a striker and FSG wouldn’t buy him one?

Ok.....

Hahaha what fun this is, reasonably normal posters go completely loopy when their agenda is questioned. 

That's the inane observation dealt with now address the rest of the comment, FSG fans are prone to cherry pick with their replies.

A lot of words there Stu but not sure it means too much.

In all the posts I've read from you on this topic recently I'm still no wiser as to what exactly you'd like to see them do?

Spend more money ?

Spend more money ?

On what?

Hahaha what fun this is, reasonably normal posters go completely loopy when their agenda is questioned. 

That's the inane observation dealt with now address the rest of the comment, FSG fans are prone to cherry pick with their replies.

With all due respect...and remember, I'm saying, with all due respect, senility doesn't look pretty on you.

A lot of words there Stu but not sure it means too much.

In all the posts I've read from you on this topic recently I'm still no wiser as to what exactly you'd like to see them do?

It means what it says Si, as stated FSG fans cherry pick critical comment and mentally erase criticism.
If as implied the comment was inapplicable, incoherent or as nonsensical as some claim, surely after many pages of comment if this was the case the mods wold have called a halt.
The truth is it is fair comment on the thread title but some seem to resent their opinion being questioned. 

With all due respect...and remember, I'm saying, with all due respect, senility doesn't look pretty on you.

Noted and dismissed.

       

It means what it says Si, as stated FSG fans cherry pick critical comment and mentally erase criticism.
If as implied the comment was inapplicable, incoherent or as nonsensical as some claim, surely after many pages of comment if this was the case the mods wold have called a halt.
The truth is it is fair comment on the thread title but some seem to resent their opinion being questioned. 

Some like you?

To quote the great Mel Brooks film Blazing Saddles...you use your tongue prettier than a twenty dollar whore.

All of your attempted eloquent dialogue does nothing to impugn those that would question the validity of your chosen rhetoric.

Noted and dismissed.

I said "with all due respect" though.

Some like you?

To quote the great Mel Brooks film Blazing Saddles...you use your tongue prettier than a twenty dollar whore.

All of your attempted eloquent dialogue does nothing to impugn those that would question the validity of your chosen rhetoric.

Fairy muff.

On what?

I dunno, was just assuming that was what stuey means

Hahaha what fun this is, reasonably normal posters go completely loopy when their agenda is questioned. 

That's the inane observation dealt with now address the rest of the comment, FSG fans are prone to cherry pick with their replies.

Only one with an agenda here is you. Still waiting for details of this apparent fraud they’ve conducted by taking money out the club via dividends that’s don’t appear in the clubs accounts and also detail of the increased value on non existent markets

Or maybe the detail around your issue with the valuation of the ‘profitable asset which is Liverpool fc’ increasing?

Thank F**k the West Ham game is a week Sunday!!

Only one with an agenda here is you. Still waiting for details of this apparent fraud they’ve conducted by taking money out the club via dividends that’s don’t appear in the clubs accounts and also detail of the increased value on non existent markets

Or maybe the detail around your issue with the valuation of the ‘profitable asset which is Liverpool fc’ increasing?

I think what he means is that the value of the club has gone up, and the owners group will make more money when they eventually sell (if they do), and this is what he means as a "dividend".
It's always a problem when people try to appear knowledgeable about something and start throwing words around that don't mean what they think they mean.

"Feeding the asset" presumably means pumping their own money in, FFP notwithstanding.

So the gripe is what it's always been; the owners stand to make more money when they sell, without putting any of their own money in.

Their time and expertise apparently don't come into the equation, and nor does the fact that they have done great work on the commercial side of things, and increased our revenue year on year.

Only Klopp has saved us from oblivion, apparently, and the owners stumping up for the players he wants is meaningless.

And on that note, unless someone has something sensible to say, I'm out.

Only one with an agenda here is you. Still waiting for details of this apparent fraud they’ve conducted by taking money out the club via dividends that’s don’t appear in the clubs accounts and also detail of the increased value on non existent markets

Or maybe the detail around your issue with the valuation of the ‘profitable asset which is Liverpool fc’ increasing?

Who said they were taking money out of the club?
Are you disputing that LFC are an asset?

Leave the blow alone and stop wasting time.

They aren't doing that bad Stu.

Present day squad.



Since FSG arrived, with a bit of luck and without F***ing ramos we'd have won every major trophy available in club football.

Looking forward to it Ian, as you say we can do without another Ramos

We'll meet Real in the cl this season and lovren will go up for a header and accidentally bring his arm down and break ramos' stupid F***ing nose, you mark my words!

Would be better around the shoulder/neck area

Deflect deflect deflect. Nuff said.

Where is the deflection?
You asked if not having like for like replacement for Mo is Klopp's fault or FSG's!?!?
Like other FSG fans you develop an inability to understand the written word if it is not a pro-FSG mixture of praise.

Where is the deflection?
You asked if not having like for like replacement for Mo is Klopp's fault or FSG's!?!?
Like other FSG fans you develop an inability to understand the written word if it is not a pro-FSG mixture of praise.

I'm not an FSG fan you pedantic tit so you can stop with that garbage. Now, answer the question, does not having a Mo replacement (oh wait...we did...his name was Ox but he was injured prior) fall under FSG's fault or Klopp's?

I'm not an FSG fan you pedantic tit so you can stop with that garbage. Now, answer the question, does not having a Mo replacement (oh wait...we did...his name was Ox but he was injured prior) fall under FSG's fault or Klopp's?

Go figure, as stated earlier FSG have been here 8 years while Klopp only a fraction of that time, deflect that.

Go figure, as stated earlier FSG have been here 8 years while Klopp only a fraction of that time, deflect that.

Klopp had multiple transfer windows to buy a striker. Brendan bought who he bought, wasn’t aware that FSG selected transfer targets or do you claim to know more than the rest of us?