Trending Topics

      Next match: Fulham v LFC [Premier League] Sun 21st Apr @ 4:30 pm
      Craven Cottage

      Today is the 19th of April and on this date LFC's match record is P32 W19 D8 L5

      Roy Hodgson's Net Spend at L.F.C.

      Read 17601 times
      0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
      Venison 86
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 5,157 posts | 205 
      Re: Roy Hodgson's Net Spend at L.F.C.
      Reply #115: Sep 01, 2010 11:20:36 am
      I will do over the next day or two mate, I'm not at the races today got n infection in my ear canal lost my balance and fell into the door stencil and took all the skin off my forehead.

      I frequently do that after 10 pints ;) I reckon I had better have my ears checked out just in case.

      Best leave if for a day you never know the paperwork for the 20m striker we signed at 5.59 last night might still surface. >:(
      kb2x
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,841 posts | 215 
      • #WeComeNotToPlay
      Re: Roy Hodgson's Net Spend at L.F.C.
      Reply #116: Sep 09, 2010 12:45:53 pm
      According to Hicks, we made £38m and bought £48m
      Ally-LFC
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 4,625 posts | 113 
      • Walk on, walk on, with hope in your heart
      Re: Roy Hodgson's Net Spend at L.F.C.
      Reply #117: Sep 09, 2010 01:04:54 pm
      So, considering we finished 7th last season with one of the best managers in the business, we sack him and have a summer spending of -11 million.

      I find it hard to see how we can do better this season.
      TKIDLLTK
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 8,362 posts | 158 
      Re: Roy Hodgson's Net Spend at L.F.C.
      Reply #118: Sep 09, 2010 02:20:36 pm
      £18,775,000 will go someway to refinancing when you add the standard chartered money =  around £34m and the business model looks so much more viable now weve really reduced the wage bill.

      Can see RBS or possibly Barcap refinancing Tom & Georgey boy now they are getting funds together.

      No chance.  Selling players is not a sustainable business model, you can only sell those assets once, they are just papering over the cracks.  The fact that RBS get the interest payment today doesn't blind them to the fact that the loan can't be repaid - particularly when we are missing out on potential matchday stadium revenue and the most lucrative market, Champions League football.

      I understand your concern and I won't rest easy until they are finally gone, but I find it highly implausible that RBS will allow them to continue - they know we are worth more with them gone.  Without the cancers' interest payments, the club would be making a small profit - plus we would be able to invest in the new stadium generating more revenue long term.

      Our owners insolvent and going bankrupt.  They are sub-prime.  H&G are beneath financial excrement.
      « Last Edit: Sep 09, 2010 02:40:03 pm by TKIDLLTK »
      TKIDLLTK
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 8,362 posts | 158 
      Re: Roy Hodgson's Net Spend at L.F.C.
      Reply #119: Sep 13, 2010 01:05:25 am
      Summer Window Total Net Spend
      -£12.4M (Probably nearer -£15m given the undisclosed transfers)

      And that is not even including Insua and Aquilani.
      liamlfc94
      • Forum Dean Saunders
      • *

      • 65 posts |
      Re: Roy Hodgson's Net Spend at L.F.C.
      Reply #120: Dec 01, 2010 09:34:14 am
      HAHA i dont trust hodgson with our money !
      vitez
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 2,701 posts | 156 
      Re: Roy Hodgson's Net Spend at L.F.C.
      Reply #121: Dec 01, 2010 12:18:29 pm
      Hodgson's big clearout leaves Liverpool with £9m agents' bill

      Liverpool have paid out more than £9m – the price of the second striker they could not afford last summer – on agents' fees in the past year, a figure eclipsed only by Chelsea, as the Anfield club tackled the legacy of previous manager Rafael Benitez.

      The amount spent by all Premier League clubs on agents in the year from 1 October 2009 to 30 September, a period taking in transfer windows in January and last summer, was more than £67m, only £3m less than the previous year despite a general reduction in transfer activity.

      While Manchester City vastly reduced their figure from £12.9m to £5.9m – the appointment of Brian Marwood as football adminstrator was designed to deliver in-house expertise – Liverpool's outlay soared to £9.03m because of the sheer turnover of playing staff. Coincidentally, manager Roy Hodgson failed to secure West Ham's Carlton Cole as a second striker on the summer transfer deadline day because the club's £9m bid proved insufficient.

      Liverpool's new owners, New England Sports Ventures, have made the pursuit of better value in the transfer market a priority. But as the club seeks to ship out many of the players that Benitez had on the books, their payments to agents may not look much better when the Premier League publishes its next table of sums paid to agents in a year's time.

      Hodgson, who has complained publicly that Benitez bequeathed him an "unbelievably overstaffed" club, has sold Diego Cavalieri, Javier Mascherano, Damien Plessis, Albert Riera, Krisztiá* Nemeth, Yossi Benayoun, plus Lauri Dalla Valle and Alex Kacaniklic, makeweights in the deal which brought in Paul Konchesky from Fulham. Each has incurred agents' fees and so, too, the loan deals including Philipp Deggen, Alberto Aquilani, Nabil El-Zar and Emiliano Insua.

      Hodgson did not choose to sell Mascherano and Benayoun, but he and his former managing director, Christian Purslow, mandated agents to find new clubs for some of the players they were desperate to shed. The substantial effort put into keeping those stars that Liverpool do not want to lose has brought new contracts for Fernando Torres and Pepe Reina, from which their agents also take a cut.

      The incoming players have been Brad Jones, Fabio Aurelio, Konchesky, Christian Poulsen, Joe Cole, Danny Wilson, Jonjo Shelvey and Raul Meireles. A concern for Liverpool must be how to sell some of those players currently out on loan whom they do not want back: Aquilani has impressed at Juventus but Insua, also on a season's loan, is currently not a starter at Galatasaray. Agents may be called in to help secure deals which will spare Liverpool their salaries.

      The new director of football strategy, Damien Comolli, also has his ideas about whom he wants to bring in – and it is little wonder that Liverpool are so desperate to do something about their academy's dire record in nurturing players of Premier League standard. In the past decade, only three Anfield academy graduates have played 40 or more games for a Premier League club.

      Manchester City are also relying on their academy to reduce a £133m annual wage bill which risks leaving them in breach of Uefa's Financial Fair Play regulations, while chief executive Garry Cook's determination to cutting the influence of agents at Eastlands has seen their agent-payment outgoings fall to a figure only slightly above the £5.36m paid out by Tottenham Hotspur, the club who pipped them to fourth spot last season.

      Manchester United, where Sir Alex Ferguson has resolved to develop the club through investing in youth, have paid only £2.3m to agents, which is considerably less than Bolton's £3.5m. The Wanderers' figure reflects the wage bill which led chairman Kevin Gartside to warn last month that players may need to be sold in January. Blackpool's £40,000 figure reflects their over-performance.

      Liverpool's announcement yesterday that Jamie Carragher needs surgery for a dislocated shoulder, and may be out for up to three months, increases the prospect of a centre-half being signed. The France international Adil Rami, one of a number of Lille players that Hodgson has watched recently, has a physical strength which suggests he is cut out for the Premier League. But Lille will want ¤15m (£12.5m) for the Moroccan-born player – and then, of course, there will be the agents' fees.

      Club payments to agents

      The table shows the total paid by each Premier League club to agents involved in transfers and loan deals in the period 1 October 2009 to 30 September 2010.

      The amounts include payments made by clubs on behalf of players.

      Arsenal £3,660,199

      Aston Villa £2,279,536

      Birmingham City £1,518,529

      Blackburn Rovers £1,623,232

      Blackpool £45,000

      Bolton Wanderers £3,549,316

      Chelsea £9,293,751

      Everton £3,599,040

      Fulham £2,087,373

      Liverpool £9,032,528

      Manchester City £5,952,261

      Manchester United £2,312,726

      Newcastle United £2,417,776

      Stoke City £2,196,968

      Sunderland £4,421,990

      Tottenham Hotspur £5,361,229

      West Bromwich Albion £614,195

      West Ham United £3,419,089

      Wigan Athletic £2,461,500

      Wolverhampton £1,291,794

      Total (of all 20 clubs): £67,138,040

      http://www.independent.ie/sport/soccer/premier-league/hodgsons-big-clearout-leaves-liverpool-with-9m-agents-bill-2443538.html?

      edit: I know this doesn't really belong here but at the same token, I didn't think it deserved it's on thread.  The reason I posted this article was for people to gain a better understanding of transfer windows and all the little bits of money that can contribute to spending.  A free transfer is never a free transfer especially for someone with the profile of Joe Cole (£5m signing on fee alone) and the increased wages and potentially agent fees that come with free transfers.  High turnover of players will again impact on finances.  When people draw up their potential fantasy transfers keep things like this in mind.
      « Last Edit: Dec 01, 2010 12:45:13 pm by vitez »
      lfc_ynwa
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 9,109 posts | 233 
      • In Kenny we trust. YNWA. Tits!!
      Re: Roy Hodgson's Net Spend at L.F.C.
      Reply #122: Jan 09, 2011 10:02:17 pm
      Shouldn't this now be kenny's net spend at Liverpool?
      7-King Kenny-7
      • Lives on Sesame Street
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 44,014 posts | 5760 
      • You'll Never Walk Alone!
      Re: Roy Hodgson's Net Spend at L.F.C.
      Reply #123: Jan 09, 2011 10:05:56 pm
      Shouldn't this now be kenny's net spend at Liverpool?

      No because he wasn't in charge when this stuff took place, therefore it's Woy's net spend.
      RedLFCBlood
      • Guest
      Re: Roy Hodgson's Net Spend at L.F.C.
      Reply #124: Jan 09, 2011 10:07:43 pm
      Should be locked now, Roys no longer here so its not going to grow.
      lfc_ynwa
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 9,109 posts | 233 
      • In Kenny we trust. YNWA. Tits!!
      Re: Roy Hodgson's Net Spend at L.F.C.
      Reply #125: Jan 09, 2011 10:08:26 pm
      No because he wasn't in charge when this stuff took place, therefore it's Woy's net spend.

      So start a new thread? With Roy gone this thread ain't going to be much good anymore.
      JD
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 39,595 posts | 6928 
      Re: Roy Hodgson's Net Spend at L.F.C.
      Reply #126: Jan 12, 2011 10:13:41 am
      Topic Locked.

      NESV haven't made any transfers yet so there is no need to start one for Kenny, it will be similar to the NESV thread.

      Quick Reply