Judge says families of Hillsborough dead should act with more dignity

The irony is the Times is owned by you know who.

F***ing torie b***ard.

It is really starting to piss me off now. Why shouldn't these families want justice?

Why does this tw*t think he should be telling anyone especially these families how to behave. They have only behaved with dignity over the past years!

I won't be buying this paper again just because they printed such utter crap!

Despicable comments.

Either he's on an agenda, and attacking brave families who are seeking justice for those they lost, which makes him a real c**t.

Or he's dreadfully uneducated, lapping up the lies that were spread, which for an ex-judge is inexcusable.

A prize gobs***e, running his F***ing mouth, eager at the opportunity to slag off the plebs, the working class northern scum, as he probably thinks of the families.

Regardless of his age, he deserves a kicking.

Besides slandering the names of 96 innocent people what did this b***ard do to earn the title of Sir Oliver Popplewell.
                                                 It is just as well he is a retired judge because with statements like that he must of convicted a lot of innocent people over the years .

It is just as well he is a retired judge because with statements like that he must of convicted a lot of innocent people over the years .

That is a worrying thought. The establishment in this country is really fu**ed up that people like him have such a position.

A typical retort from a kunt so far removed from reality, one of Thatcher's lot spouting sh*te about something he knows F**k all about, the type of kunt the likes of Cameron, Hague, that other Kunt, John Redwood(think that kunt's frog up) who cares, and all the rest of Thatcher's establishment junkies, who make it there goal in life to F**k over the working classes, a gin drinking arl dodderer, with a silverspoon stuck up his f***in Eton educated jacksey, hope the Kunt chokes on his Churchillian cigar and his piles give him excrutiating agony, senile old Kunt.

Is from a public schoolboy whos never done a days work in his life and completely out of touch from reality. worthless comments from a worthless person.

Didnt see much arguement against the letter in the press which for me is just as bad,why did they print such a vile thing.Its totally irrelevant to the current situation so why publish is this the powers that be getting in a couple of low blows before the sh*t hits the fan. The old adage "you cant beat the sytem" springs to mind.

He said: 'The citizens of Bradford behaved with quiet dignity and great courage.'
So have the Hillsborough families

They did not harbour conspiracy theories. They did not seek endless further inquiries.'
True, but did anyone accuse them of building the fire themselves? Of stealing from fellow fans? Of Urinating on fellow fans? Did the Police Officer in charge tell a complete pack of lies to try and cover his own rear end?

They buried their dead, comforted the bereaved and succoured the injured.
And the Hillsborough families didn't?

Frankly the two incidents are so TOTALLY different to each other that the comparison is ludicrous and could only be made by someone with the intention to cause mischief.

He said: 'The citizens of Bradford behaved with quiet dignity and great courage.'
So have the Hillsborough families

They did not harbour conspiracy theories. They did not seek endless further inquiries.'
True, but did anyone accuse them of building the fire themselves? Of stealing from fellow fans? Of Urinating on fellow fans? Did the Police Officer in charge tell a complete pack of lies to try and cover his own rear end?

They buried their dead, comforted the bereaved and succoured the injured.
And the Hillsborough families didn't?

Frankly the two incidents are so TOTALLY different to each other that the comparison is ludicrous and could only be made by someone with the intention to cause mischief.

The establishment hitting back!

This pr**k's comments, Lord Justice Stuart-Smith's comments way back in the 90s and the message Steve Rotherham has been trying to get across means there is something waiting to be revealed about those in charge in 89 and the establishment don't like it one bit.

And in these days of social media, we're going to make sure EVERYONE knows about it.

He"s a relic of Thatcherism totally out of touch with society and we shouldn"t expect anything else from him and his ilk.

Give out knighthoods to any dumb c**ts these days, wont they?

Didnt see much arguement against the letter in the press which for me is just as bad,why did they print such a vile thing.Its totally irrelevant to the current situation so why publish is this the powers that be getting in a couple of low blows before the sh*t hits the fan. The old adage "you cant beat the sytem" springs to mind.

This^

Didnt see much arguement against the letter in the press which for me is just as bad,why did they print such a vile thing.Its totally irrelevant to the current situation so why publish is this the powers that be getting in a couple of low blows before the sh*t hits the fan. The old adage "you cant beat the sytem" springs to mind.

I read the comments posted in the papers that ran the story, and they were mostly very positive for us, and against this fucktard.

Silly old c**t if ever an argument for euthanasia was needed...

Nowt wrong with the youth in Asia mate.

Nowt wrong with the youth in Asia mate.

Leave those ladyboys alone dude...

Leave those ladyboys alone dude.

Look like women, sound like women and can put a shelf up

Overlooking the todger, I challenge you to find fault

EDIT: Just remembered what thread I'm posting on, probably not the most sensetive place for ladyboy jokes

Perhaps we should start a new thread

Nowt wrong with the youth in Asia mate.

Ali-G Euthanasia

Back on topic, I suspect his age has little to do with the sh*te he spouts. Once a c**t, always a c**t. And being such a c**t probably got him in the position he was in.

We all know people like him don't live in the real world - no excuse for him to say what he did though.

He could have quite easily looked at the evidence, but probably couldn't be arsed as he slurped another G&T and gave bliar an arse tonguing.

The problem is that these people actually think people take notice of them - if we just ignore the tw*ts, perhaps they'll go away...

The day I start to be bothered about what a senile 84 year old judge has to say won't be happening soon.

This is a side issue - a distraction - and we shouldn't give him an iota of our time or thoughts.  Far bigger fish to fry on this issue.

Spot on. It's people like this that only make it more difficult to seek justice by putting obstacles in the campaign's way. F*ck him.

The irony is the Times is owned by you know who.

So is SKY which will parade the other lying b***ard McKenzie shortly - the poisonous little tw*t Murdoch is still peddling evil after all his humility bullshit and symbolic apologies he was forced into acting out.

But like it or not, his ignorant unresearched views are listened to by lazy people who can't be arsed to read about the subject themselves. This was a knight and a judge writing a letter in the Times which has a very large, well educated and influential circulation. Labelling the families "conspiracy theorists" is a cheapshot that seems to require no further justification to make a case; I know from experience. Many people will agree with what he wrote despite any lack of substance within his comments but there is probably little which we can do about it other than educate where we have the chance, so that people like him can be exposed when talking sh*te.

The good news is his expirey date is beckoning.