Trending Topics

      Next match: v [] Thu 1st Jan @ 1:00 am

      Today is the 28th of May and on this date LFC's match record is P5 W1 D3 L1

      LFC Reds Poll

      Q. Would you have Torres back at Anfield for 20 Million?

      Yes?
      104 (50.7%)
      No?
      101 (49.3%)

      Total Members Voted: 200

      Fernando Torres (Chelsea)

      Read 62858 times
      0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
      KennyIsKing
      • Banned
      • *****

      • 4,628 posts | 129 
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #483: Dec 19, 2011 01:40:34 am
      Perhaps, but then again, it is probably more to do with his arrogance, and contempt he shows to his fellow reds.

      hehe, tis true - but it's also true that certain people have targetted him, and in that instance, what do you expect?

      Thanks to some people, he had nothing but antagonism, and he reacted accordingly.

      I know he's "different" but the cliques on here have also helped make him that way.
      Macedonian_Red
      • Banned
      • *****

      • 4,762 posts | 63 
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #484: Dec 19, 2011 02:42:07 am
      actually he said that he was happy to be at a big club , which in my opinion is even more insulting , in his view we were a small club.

      Suarez has said that he is happy to be at a big club like LFC. Does that means he is considering Ajax a small club ?
      Court LFC
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 8,496 posts | 182 
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #485: Dec 19, 2011 03:48:45 am
      I see that the usual manner of business is in force.

      Perhaps if mac_red was a subscriber he'd get more time and less abuse.

      Still - if Torres comes, he comes, and people can gob about jealousy and team mates hating him all they want - it doesn't make it any more realistic.

      I find it amusing that people haven't understood the irony that their own locks and posts explain.

      But hey, it's a tenner.

      Better a tenner than a site without arsehole trolls eh.

      Agree with that fella.  Spot on.
      Roddenberry
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 16,568 posts | 1876 
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #486: Dec 19, 2011 09:35:57 am
      hehe, tis true - but it's also true that certain people have targetted him, and in that instance, what do you expect?

      Thanks to some people, he had nothing but antagonism, and he reacted accordingly.

      I know he's "different" but the cliques on here have also helped make him that way.


      If he wasn't arrogant and aggressive from his first non-aggregated post, you may have had a point. As for his transfer posts. I had a problem with the sheer amount of shitty journalistic speculation before he got here, he tripled the amount of crap that got posted, so much so I now rarely venture into a transfer board, except to clear them from the unread posts. 

      As for Torres, I wouldn't have him back, I know people say form is temporary, class is permanent, what if he's showed us his true class at Chelsea and his temporary form was with us? 
      « Last Edit: Dec 19, 2011 09:47:05 am by Roddenberry »
      kb2x
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,841 posts | 215 
      • #WeComeNotToPlay
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #487: Dec 19, 2011 11:19:24 am
      Have we actually legitimately been linked with him?
      RedLFCBlood
      • Guest
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #488: Dec 19, 2011 11:20:44 am
      Have we actually legitimately been linked with him?


      No mate. :D

      So 17 pages of arguing, waffling and reminiscing, for nothing. ;)
      what-a-hit-son
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 16,506 posts | 4850 
      • t: @MrPrice1979 i: @klmprice101518
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #489: Dec 19, 2011 11:26:04 am

      No mate. :D

      So 17 pages of arguing, waffling and reminiscing, for nothing. ;)

      Yes, but are you trying to tell me it wasn't good?
      RedLFCBlood
      • Guest
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #490: Dec 19, 2011 11:28:13 am
      Yes, but are you trying to tell me it wasn't good?

      Some intresting reading for sure.
      Benito
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 2,940 posts | 285 
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #491: Dec 19, 2011 09:35:30 pm
      Not a chance he will come back or that Chelski would loose 30 mill in 1 season over 1 player.
      johnlfcreds2010
      • Forum Ian Callaghan
      • ****

      • 996 posts | 69 
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #492: Dec 19, 2011 09:57:05 pm
      99 so we can sing our song again without number in the lyric. would love to see him back but a long shot me thinks.
      he's a finisher - thats what we need
      RedLFCBlood
      • Guest
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #493: Dec 19, 2011 10:25:07 pm
      he's a finisher - thats what we need


      Well going of his current form he'd struggle to finish afternoon tea.
      iiBonKeRsS
      • Banned
      • **

      • 162 posts |
      • Reppin' Liverpool FC Since 1892.
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #494: Dec 19, 2011 10:42:21 pm
      I'd like him back if he can bloody play better for us than shitty chelsea!
      stephenmc9
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 2,822 posts | 39 
      • 'Liverpool was made for me and I was made for Live
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #495: Dec 20, 2011 02:28:06 am
      Roddenberry
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 16,568 posts | 1876 
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #496: Dec 20, 2011 02:31:41 am

      I feel better for editing that.  :D
      paulboo
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,146 posts | 10 
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #497: Dec 20, 2011 12:14:08 pm
      It would be great to think we could get him on the cheap and apologise for his wrongs and even more so ..to solve our scoring problem. But being realistic were thinking of the world class player we once had and there are huge doubts if he could recover that form. Though in fairness we all started seeing a bit of the old Torres just before he was sent off a while ago and since then hes been missing again. But the thought of him teaming up with Suarez under the guidance of the King is tempting. But if we were going to chuck £20m at the chavs it would be for Sturridge.
      RedLFCBlood
      • Guest
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #498: Dec 20, 2011 12:14:58 pm
      Breaking News: Fernando Torres breaks club rules and goes on all night drinking session before Wigan Athletic game. His reasons were "I can't score goals so I hit the bar instead".

      At least he's getting closer.
      Macedonian_Red
      • Banned
      • *****

      • 4,762 posts | 63 
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #499: Dec 20, 2011 02:37:46 pm
      But if we were going to chuck £20m at the chavs it would be for Sturridge.

      Why would Chelsea sell Sturridge to us ?
      shabbadoo
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 29,479 posts | 4595 
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #500: Dec 20, 2011 02:38:50 pm
      Breaking News: Fernando Torres breaks club rules and goes on all night drinking session before Wigan Athletic game. His reasons were "I can't score goals so I hit the bar instead".

      At least he's getting closer.

      Bit like our carroll then daz. ;)
      Kieranlfc88
      • Forum Dean Saunders
      • *

      • 71 posts |
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #501: Dec 20, 2011 03:39:03 pm
      Why would Chelsea sell Sturridge to us ?

      Why the hell didn't we get him included in the Torres deal - or at least done kind if 1st option?
      Diego LFC
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 19,333 posts | 2834 
      • Sempre Liverpool
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #502: Dec 20, 2011 03:40:46 pm
      Breaking News: Fernando Torres breaks club rules and goes on all night drinking session before Wigan Athletic game. His reasons were "I can't score goals so I hit the bar instead".

      At least he's getting closer.

      Taking lessons with Carroll eh?
      Macedonian_Red
      • Banned
      • *****

      • 4,762 posts | 63 
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #503: Dec 20, 2011 03:52:56 pm
      Why the hell didn't we get him included in the Torres deal - or at least done kind if 1st option?

      That ship has sailed.
      Macedonian_Red
      • Banned
      • *****

      • 4,762 posts | 63 
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #504: Dec 21, 2011 12:22:49 am

      With Luis being banned by the Mancs-loving FA for 8 games, I think that Torres would be just the perfect player to punish the Mancs at the Old Toilet on February 11th.
      RedLFCBlood
      • Guest
      Re: Fernando Torres (Chelsea)
      Reply #505: Dec 21, 2011 12:33:04 am
      With Luis being banned by the Mancs-loving FA for 8 games, I think that Torres would be just the perfect player to punish the Mancs at the Old Toilet on February 11th.


      Nah Suarez will be the perfect player to punish the mancs as he won't be banned for the game as the club will exhaust every available avenue to clear his name and I hope Suarez puts them to the sword scoring a hat trick then runs over to Evra and snogs him on the lips following his 3rd goal.

      Quick Reply