It's a bit of a misleading way to frame the debate isn't it? (I'm not blaming the thread-starter, by the way, this kind of discussion comes up all the time amongst supporters.) What I mean is that no one wants a place in the top four in and of itself. It's not trophy-worthy to finish 2nd, 3rd, or 4th--nor should it be--and I don't think anyone thinks otherwise. No, those who suggest that getting into the top 4 might be a higher priority than bringing home the Carling Cup (full disclosure, I'm one of them) do so, I think, for two reasons.
First, the duh reason. It gives you a shot at getting into the Champions League, which of course is a massive trophy to win (a sidebar to the whole trophy vs. top 4 debate: it must be acknowledged that not all trophies are esteemed equally). Add to that the fact that Champions League football is a great source of revenue and a key factor in recruiting top players and I think it becomes fairly clear fairly quickly that the knock-on effects of getting into the Champions League positions are huge. Huger than bagging another Carling Cup? For me it is, yes.
Second, and just as significantly, getting in amongst the top four provides a platform for future league success. Not just in terms of generating greater revenue or attracting better players but also in terms of building a sense of momentum and progress, cultivating a winning mentality and generally just providing a platform for future success in the league. Ask yourselves, when was the last time a club finished outside the top four one year and went on to win the league the next? It's a nearly impossible feat these days and it underscores why getting back into the top four is so important. If we ever hope to reclaim the league title we need to be up at the business end of the table and the sooner we get there, the sooner we get our hands on title number 19.
Logged