Trending Topics

      Next match: LFC v Spurs [Premier League] Sun 5th May @ 4:30 pm
      Anfield

      Today is the 29th of April and on this date LFC's match record is P29 W11 D6 L12

      Tom Inces new valuation.

      Read 5568 times
      0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
      KopiteLuke
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 21,056 posts | 3784 
      Re: Tom Inces new valuation.
      Reply #23: Apr 06, 2013 06:28:22 am
      Just stinks of trouble where Paul Ince is concerned, I'd be put off by his involvement alone.

      As for value, he's worth as much as someone is willing to pay for him, not what someone says he's worth, the same as any asset.
      redindian
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,989 posts | 240 
      Re: Tom Inces new valuation.
      Reply #24: Apr 06, 2013 06:43:25 am
      This should have been in the jokes thread.
      little-Luis:)
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 7,844 posts | 179 
      Re: Tom Inces new valuation.
      Reply #25: Apr 07, 2013 12:42:00 pm
      Blackpool trying to squeeze more money for one of their players? Never!!
      TheRedMosquito
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 12,201 posts | 633 
      • Elmore James got nothin' on this baby!
      Re: Tom Inces new valuation.
      Reply #26: Apr 08, 2013 07:28:49 pm
      The sad thing is: I can actually see us paying over-the-odds for him.
      xSkyline
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,829 posts | 101 
      Re: Tom Inces new valuation.
      Reply #27: Apr 08, 2013 07:39:16 pm
      The sad thing is: I can actually see us paying over-the-odds for him.
      With one year on his contract I hope not.
      lester76
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 4,810 posts | 242 
      Re: Tom Inces new valuation.
      Reply #28: Apr 09, 2013 11:08:49 pm
      The thing is though that in my opinion is a player we need.

      He has come on leaps and bounds at Blackpool.

      Why Paul has decided to come out and say that is a bit nuts but i can see why.

      On one hand he has stacked the pressure on his son and also possibly deterred a few potential suitors but on the other hand he is very aware that his son is gonna leave and he has a job on his hands to be successful at Blackpool.

      In terms of comparing to Zaha i do reckon that Thomas is a better player but then again i am hugely bias and always want a big signing for the scum to fall flat on their faces!

      Carlos Qiqabal
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,119 posts | 56 
      Re: Tom Inces new valuation.
      Reply #29: Apr 10, 2013 12:17:43 pm

      Dont we get a third of whatever fee he goes for? if we get him for 8 million - great - if someone wants to bay that amount for him we have covered our fee for Coutinho by shipping Ince of fto blackpool.

      If you had been asked at the time whether you wanted Countinho for the price of Ince leaving I know what I'd have said :)
      scouse_jatt
      • Forum Kevin Keegan
      • ***

      • 349 posts | 14 
      Re: Tom Inces new valuation.
      Reply #30: Apr 10, 2013 10:59:45 pm
      F**k me how much is Suarez worth then?
      real enemy
      • Forum Geoff Strong
      • **

      • 209 posts |
      Re: Tom Inces new valuation.
      Reply #31: Apr 11, 2013 02:32:13 pm
      Probably a little off of a comparison i make. When we bought Cisse and Chelsea bought Drogba, we bought the top scorer of the league with less money than Chelsea bought Drogba. Time proves Drogba went on to become a better performer than Cisse. My point is Ince may play better and may cost less but who's to say Zaha who cost a whopping more isn't going to perform better than Ince eventually? Until both start to play in the Premiership, the comparison have probably start too early.
      Bier
      • Guest
      Re: Tom Inces new valuation.
      Reply #32: Apr 11, 2013 03:18:50 pm
      That's not comparable. Abramovich had just taken over Chelsea back then, spend 140 million pounds that summer. And Drogba only signed a year earlier for Marseille, who were a big enough club to not sell for cheap and Chelsea grossly overpaid. Drogba also performed very well in Europe that year, I remember he lost the UEFA Cup final with Marseille against Rafa's Valencia that year. Auxerre wasn't that big a club, and untill this day that 15 million they got for Cissé is the highest transfer fee they ever recieved.

      But everybody knows transfer fees don't accurately depict quality, there's other factors involved that influence transfer fees.
      « Last Edit: Apr 11, 2013 03:34:22 pm by Bier »

      Quick Reply