I'd still have Johnson. If Kelly was the better full back, he would have replaced Johnson as the full back when fit. he hasn't. Kelly has only played full back when Johnson has played LB, and Johnson has never been moved to accommodate Kelly. If that was so, then why haven't we seen Kelly & Enrique as the full backs with Johnson on the bench at any stage?
I'm a big fan of Johnson's, always have been. Think he was brilliant in the first section of our season. He was a very central figure to our creative play, and nearly always available for an outlet ball to carry the ball forward from deep with Allen was dithering with it. His form has taken a serious hit for the worse since February, although he did regain some form against Fulham, the goal aside. Maybe it's due to the fact that there is serious rumours that he has been told he can leave?
I'm a fan of Kelly, but he needs games, and lots of them. Rodgers has said he tried to loan him as a CB fro Swansea, so maybe this is where he will play him when everyone is fit. Also, he seems to have a lot of hamstring & muscle problems. I don't know if this is due to growing pains/ increase in fitness pressure or just him, but playing CB could suit him better than at RB as he won't be under as much pressure to be running up & down the line all game, and heavy sprints, stretching for balls to cross etc as he is not the fastest player in the world either. They could all be factors in his muscle injuries.
Also, does Kelly have the technique needed to be a tricky, crossing full back in an attack minded team? It's been a while since we saw him play like, and it's not as if we have 50 games to base it on. I can't imagine him beating too many players with a trick and getting a cross in like. You can with Johnson.
I'd still have Johnson, with Kelly as a more than capable cover, but would prefer to try Kelly as a CB, grooming him there, playing some games at RB if needed.
Logged