I'm not being sarcastic in this thread, so if you think I am I apologize.
Oops my bad but in my defence...
You don't understand sarcasm much do you?
Because I was really serious that Southampton should have finished higher because of their high spend Wow
Bazinga.
My point that you so deftly managed to circumvent
I circumvented nothing FL.
You wrote
"Maybe budget wasn't that important in the decision". I was responding to only that, if you read my post again you'll probably realise this but I'll apologise if it wasn't clear.
So... do you think 'we' would have bought him [Aspas] if he was £27m million or not? Was budget "important in the decision" or not?
I don't deem qualifying for Champion's League the ultimate justification, if you are going to spend the kind of money these clubs spend, you should be winning it, not just qualifying.
Ah... I see... fair enough.
Maybe, then, you should
only have googled Champions League winners then checked to see if they sign top players at a premium.
I guess, tho', it's fair to say you can't win it if you're not in it and if you don't spend top dollar, for top players, (at some point, at least), you are most definitely
NOT going to win it.
The evidence bears witness to this - something that
shouldn't be "circumvented" by the way.
Geninuely trying to get some insight from folks that know way more about football than I do.
Thanks, I'm glad I have helped.
This thread has run it's course as far as I'm concerned. Catch y'all later.
« Last Edit: Jul 13, 2013 01:12:13 pm by bad boy bubby »
Logged