Sakho is sh*te. Complete and total sh*te.
I just thought it was me who thought he passed the ball five yards and did so to get rid of it like it was on fire.
Ive never rated him but I though " what the f**k do I know ?".
Every game Ive seen him play he has made a gaff.
In the CL last week the striker nutmegged him so easily for their goal.
In the West Ham game his ridiculous pass was responsible for their goal number three.
When Ive been reading people on the forum going ......lets play Lovren and Sakho .... or Skrtel and Sakho ...... Ive wanted to scream in despair... No Lets Not.
So.
Found some one else who shares my opinion,
Paints the picture perfectly.
I'm not deluded after all.
Worse than Downing ......and that is going some .
https://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/blogs/early-doors/rodgers-is-liverpool-s-greatest-asset---but-also-their-biggest-liability-194957115.html
At the start of this season, a few people pointed out that Mamadou Sakho wasn’t very good.
A number even pointed this out at the time he signed for Liverpool last year.
Those who raised the most reasonable objections to his signing had seen Sakho play for the last few years.
He had made his debut for PSG at 17 and quickly became captain, and remained a popular figure with the fans and managers after the takeover. PSG were reluctant sellers when Liverpool came in for his signature, and they eventually accepted a significant sum of £18 million for the central defender.
There were plenty of Liverpool fans who thought that if PSG didn’t want to sell him, and only did so when a high transfer fee were offered, that he must be an excellent prospect.
After all, PSG had all the money in the world and would therefore only be after the very best players.
But there was a problem: the fundamental reason that PSG wished he would stay wasn't because of his talent, but because the owners were trying to keep a good relationship with their fans. There are countless examples of new owners making mistakes and alienating the old hardcore, and this was an easy way to make sure that they didn’t.
However, the fact remains that at the time, Sakho was out of the team because Alex - the one who failed to convince at Chelsea - was keeping him out of the side.
Sakho was still playing much as he did when he broke into the side as a teenager, with own goals, poor positioning and regular, simple errors.
He was, in other words, the very definition of what you don't want from a central defender - but those Liverpool fans who just saw the caps for France, the club he came from and his transfer fee thought otherwise.
Over the course of last season they were proved wrong; and nothing has changed so far in 2014/15.
This wouldn’t be so much of a problem if Brendan Rodgers had a similar knack for buying defenders as he does midfielders or forwards, but both his tactics and purchases at the back leave a lot to be desired.
Midway through the first half against West Ham, after conceding two goals in seven minutes, Rodgers switched from a back four to a back three, and removed Javi Manquillo. By all accounts Liverpool have high hopes for him, but presumably they also expected more from their previous defensive signings like Toure (appalling) and Sakho (see above).
With the amount of money spent elsewhere, it often seems like Rodgers treats defence like an afterthought. To be fair to him, that doesn’t matter so much if he excels as he did last season, with one of the most unexpectedly thrilling and enjoyable forward lines in the Premier League .