So you got nothing else to say about the core of the post - just want to comment on semantics - er OK..
Are we a better side without SG at the moment?
Anybody else other than semantics-master like to comment...?
(Semantics-master you may also say something if you wish...or you might want to pick holes on any exagerrated terms in this post... hahhaha)
Ah, but the subtleties make the difference. More deflection?
This stuff you state about Rafa being "distant" is from two years ago, and I repeat, aren't you exaggerating it? All this stuff about Stevie's sensitivity...yeah, there's basis to it, but again, aren't you overstating the case? He's a professional footballer, our club Captain and some-time England captain. He's the hero of Istanbul, something you said also; but then you keep saying, " we all know how sensitive he is". Well actually, no, I don't. I see and I read, but I don't pretend to know the guy from it. You make it sound like you know him and he's a kitten who's about to cave-in.
How about answering the questions I put to you about why you say - for a fact - that Pako's departure is down to Rafa's pride? How do you know this all the way over in Spain? Is that in Stevie's auto-biography too? Oh hang-on, it came out last year, and Pako's departure was since then. What's your source for that again - oh yeah, you refused to say - just referred to it being discussed on forums and phone-ins.
Feller, if you know things about recent events, why are you reluctant to reveal how? If you can't for some reason, what is the point of making statements about Pako without the facts to back them up? Why start? What, you think your statements will just be trusted off-hand? Rafa and the players constantly deny that Pako's departure is having a significant effect. Sure, it's bound to have had some effect, but again, how much is hard to say and down to speculation and impossible to really gauge from the outside, so your statements about Rafa's "cajones" are nothing more than speculation - without something concrete to back it up - and I'm not going to pander to such statements, or the person who makes them. If it was stated as an opinion - that's different, but that's not what you do. You state things as though they are known facts. That's why I pull you up.
In short, you are making arguments on false pretences; on facts not in evidence; an overstated case.
Logged