Biggest names ?youve got to be kidding the never ending Wankest over raheem is puzzling .
Yes he's quick
Yes he has potential
But
His decision making and final ball are a bit sh*t tbh.
Now he should get a staggered contract which offers incentives to score and perform start at £75,000 and work a £25,000 per year rise or more if needs be .
But if he thinks he is worth £150,000 per week NOW he's having a laugh.
And if city want to lob £60 mill our way then so be it.
(1)The wankfest over sterling is not puzzling, He's one of the brightest young talents around, and could end up being world class. We're lucky he came through our youth team, some excellent scouting there.
(2) What makes you think Sterling thinks he's worth 150,000? The players aren't the ones that place a value on themselves. This has Agent written all over it!
(3) I doubt City would offer that much, but if they did how much of that would disappear into the stadium fund instead of the transfer fund?
We really need (for the first time in years) to stop letting our top players go, almost every time it happens we go backwards.
We can't match the City's and Scum for wages, but we need to make sure our top players are paid in comparison to their importance to the team. Right now Sterling is one of our most important players, so should be paid accordingly. What should that figure be? I would say 120,000 would be about right.
People forget how Sterling was carrying the team in the early part of the season, all the weight was being placed on his shoulders.
Logged