Trending Topics

      Next match: LFC v Brighton [Premier League] Sun 31st Mar @ 2:00 pm
      Anfield

      Today is the 29th of March and on this date LFC's match record is P24 W11 D6 L7

      Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace

      Read 50816 times
      0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
      mcarz
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 17,179 posts | 1355 
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #115: May 31, 2017 05:22:52 pm
      I love sakho. He plays like a pregnant giraffe but I just love him.

      He has been a bit of a prat behind the scenes but whenever he has played for us I  always thought he gave everything.

      He's not everybody's cup of tea but I rate him, highly, and he was impressive at palace too. Him and matip would be some pairing I think. He is a better defender than lovren for me.

      Can't see him staying though. Sad. He will be a beast for whoever he signs for and hopefully we will get 30+ for him.

      If he played for anybody else then he'd easy sell for 30m but because it's us we'll probably get a bag of Monster Munch and 3 tins of beans.
      harrydunn08
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 5,915 posts | 957 
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #116: Jun 01, 2017 12:21:43 am
      And you (without a pinch of salt in sight) obviously believe those "rumours/reports" Harry.  😁

      Sorry mate, wasn't very clear with my post.  I haven't seen any rumors, leaks, reports, or otherwise linking us with any sort of interest in Zaha.  Considering Palace want to keep good of Sakho and the feasibility of using him as part of a deal, I would imagine if Klopp was interested in Zaha that there would have been some sort of link from someone like Pearce, Reddy, Smith, Barrett, etc.  The lack of any sort of link suggests Klopp probably ain't interested.  Maybe he is, but it doesn't appear that he is ;)
      « Last Edit: Jun 01, 2017 12:40:54 am by harrydunn08 »
      PurpleMonkey
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 10,000 posts | 1991 
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #117: Jun 03, 2017 03:40:29 pm
      I find it laughable the chairman has come out and said they can't afford Sakho. What a joke.

      I wonder how much they would sell Sakho to us if the tables were turned? 50m? Small clubs are right cu*ts!
      AlwaysTheKop
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 8,208 posts | 1418 
      • CHAMP19NS.
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #118: Jun 03, 2017 03:41:04 pm
      I really hope, even though not probable, that he makes amends and stays, I love the big man.
      littleface
      • Needs a Klopp hug or slap or both
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,283 posts | 253 
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #119: Jun 03, 2017 09:34:14 pm
      He's an average defender who is not of the standard we require. He's rash , sells himself to easily and breaks ranks irresponsibly. Sell him.
      ORCHARD RED
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 8,526 posts | 1457 
      • 6 Times!
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #120: Jun 03, 2017 09:37:59 pm
      He's an average defender who is not of the standard we require. He's rash , sells himself to easily and breaks ranks irresponsibly. Sell him.

      I've no doubt he'll be sold, but surely you would trust Klopp to improve him should he stay.
      brezipool
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 9,454 posts | 1735 
      • Mon the Red Machine !
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #121: Jul 05, 2017 01:02:58 pm
      Im sure I seen something on the Twitter yesterday he has agreed terms with palace, but that's different to what the palace chairman said recently. ?
      Robby The Z
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 9,034 posts | 2690 
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #122: Jul 13, 2017 02:01:51 am
      Klopp about Mama after tonight's game:

      "In terms of outgoings, Klopp said Mamadou Sakho needed to be "100 percent fit" before he decided whether the out-of-favour defender would feature in Liverpool's preseason."

      from ESPN.
      FL Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 31,049 posts | 6294 
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #123: Jul 14, 2017 11:48:22 am
      Palace buying  Bruno Martins Indi off of Porto so that likely means a no-go on the Sakho deal.

      Welcome home big man ;D
      Sir Suarez
      • Forum Emlyn Hughes
      • ****

      • 783 posts | 59 
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #124: Jul 14, 2017 11:57:16 am
      I know his time here is done.

      But purely on field sakho and matip would be a solid cb pairing.

      Saying that I get the feeling that if we don't get VVD then he might just get another chance...
      FL Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 31,049 posts | 6294 
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #125: Jul 14, 2017 12:13:54 pm
      I know his time here is done.

      But purely on field sakho and matip would be a solid cb pairing.

      Saying that I get the feeling that if we don't get VVD then he might just get another chance...

      He'll be like a "new signing" ;D
      Ribapuru
      • Banned
      • *****

      • 10,843 posts | 1371 
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #126: Jul 14, 2017 01:26:50 pm
      Lucas probably off to Lazio so I doubt Sakho will be going anywhere.
      AZPatriot
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 9,944 posts | 1759 
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #127: Jul 14, 2017 03:56:56 pm
      Lucas probably off to Lazio so I doubt Sakho will be going anywhere.

      Where in the hell do you come up with crap Riba?....I swear your mind works in an entirely different stratosphere then most.
      FL Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 31,049 posts | 6294 
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #128: Jul 14, 2017 04:32:19 pm
      Where in the hell do you come up with crap Riba?....I swear your mind works in an entirely different stratosphere then most.

      He's saying that Lucas being a preferred cover at CB, since he's gone we'd need another CB for cover.

      He's actually quite right.....

      Matip, Lovren, ??, ??

      Gomez may be off on Loan but even if he's here we need another CB.
      FRANS
      • Forum Billy Liddell
      • ****

      • 551 posts | 19 
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #129: Jul 14, 2017 04:41:34 pm
      We have sell him and  get  a  reliable  CB .
      chats
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 31,021 posts | 2742 
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #130: Jul 14, 2017 05:01:38 pm
      He's saying that Lucas being a preferred cover at CB, since he's gone we'd need another CB for cover.

      He's actually quite right.....

      Matip, Lovren, ??, ??

      Gomez may be off on Loan but even if he's here we need another CB.

      Klavan?

      Matip, new CB, Klavan and Lovren seems enough in terms of numbers at least.
      FATKOPITE10
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 14,342 posts | 3368 
      • Liverpool fc give me tourettes
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #131: Jul 14, 2017 05:12:53 pm
      Lucas probably off to Lazio so I doubt Sakho will be going anywhere.

      As soon as we get an acceptable offer then he will be off
      AZPatriot
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 9,944 posts | 1759 
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #132: Jul 14, 2017 05:15:33 pm
      He's saying that Lucas being a preferred cover at CB, since he's gone we'd need another CB for cover.

      He's actually quite right.....

      Matip, Lovren, ??, ??

      Gomez may be off on Loan but even if he's here we need another CB.

      The idea that Sakho's job is now saved because Lucas is being let to leave make sense to you?

      Doesn't to me.

      Means were probably getting another CB....Matip, Lovren, CB, Klaven?

      That makes sense more than the gaffer have a 180 degree turn on Sakho.
      FL Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 31,049 posts | 6294 
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #133: Jul 14, 2017 05:17:15 pm
      The idea that Sakho's job is now saved because Lucas is being let to leave make sense to you?

      Doesn't to me.

      Means were probably getting another CB....Matip, Lovren, CB, Klaven?

      That makes sense more than the gaffer have a 180 degree turn on Sakho.

      No, I don't think it's saved...but the point of us being short on CB's is a good one.  I did forget about Klaven, but still with rumors of Gomez going, and VVD being a non-possibility at this point it appears...we need some more cover.
      Ribapuru
      • Banned
      • *****

      • 10,843 posts | 1371 
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #134: Jul 14, 2017 05:33:16 pm
      The idea that Sakho's job is now saved because Lucas is being let to leave make sense to you?

      Doesn't to me.

      Means were probably getting another CB....Matip, Lovren, CB, Klaven?

      That makes sense more than the gaffer have a 180 degree turn on Sakho.
      There is no guarantee he will be sold and if we don't get the chance to sign a worthwhile CB it would not be sensible to loan Sakho out again, since eventually he will go on a free.
      AZPatriot
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 9,944 posts | 1759 
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #135: Jul 14, 2017 05:45:02 pm
      There is no guarantee he will be sold and if we don't get the chance to sign a worthwhile CB it would not be sensible to loan Sakho out again, since eventually he will go on a free.

      Why would we not get a chance to sign another CB Riba...please enlighten me?

      The gaffer has been trying to get rid of him for almost a year now....he has no place for him and the book has been closed, I have no doubt contingencies are in place and you will never see Sakho feature for the club again..the manager has pretty much come out and said it.
      RedLFCBlood
      • Guest
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #136: Jul 15, 2017 01:18:07 pm
      Why would we not get a chance to sign another CB Riba...please enlighten me?

      I'd say because Klopp wants VVD, if we don't get him Klopp could wait a season (put a lot of effort in to selling his vision to  VVD), If it doesn't happen why buy a stop gap when we have one in Sakho?
      Robby The Z
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 9,034 posts | 2690 
      Re: Mamadou Sakho to Crystal Palace
      Reply #137: Jul 21, 2017 06:51:30 pm
      I'd say because Klopp wants VVD, if we don't get him Klopp could wait a season (put a lot of effort in to selling his vision to  VVD), If it doesn't happen why buy a stop gap when we have one in Sakho?

      Our four center backs now are Matip, Lovren, Gomez and Klavan. Gomez is looking good this preseason and I hope Klopp keeps him here rather than loaning him. He should still get plenty of football this season. Raggy got some stick for some mistakes, but he also put in a number of good shifts for us. Thing is, he was signed as cover and ended up needing to be a regular starter because of injuries. If we get VVD, I still hope its Raggy they sell or loan, rather than Gomez.

      All of which is to say, there is no place for Mama, whether we sign VVD or not.

      Quick Reply