Trending Topics

      Next match: Atalanta v LFC [Europa League] Thu 18th Apr @ 8:00 pm - Pre Match Topic
      Stadio di Bergamo

      Today is the 18th of April and on this date LFC's match record is P31 W9 D10 L12

      LFC Reds Poll

      Q. Are LFC genuinely interested?

      Yes we are ready to go head to head to sign him
      49 (44.1%)
      No, it's PR spin
      62 (55.9%)

      Total Members Voted: 109

      Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)

      Read 262438 times
      0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
      Scotia
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 8,968 posts | 3052 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2760: Aug 31, 2017 09:03:01 pm
      Agreed, twitter meltdowns are a good way to spend an hour or two

      I've just had me first "spat" as well.

      Some wallaper of a Saints fan posted a pic of a crying teenager in a LFC top and encouraged that lot to re-tweet to celebrate.

      I politely pointed out that was a bit like celebrating your Mrs not shagging the guy up the road (after telling you she wanted to) cos you've locked her in the cellar!

      My wife has barred me till after the window 🤣
      AZPatriot
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 9,944 posts | 1759 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2761: Aug 31, 2017 09:03:20 pm
      What's to say he'll even be interested anymore?

      He did everything he could to force a transfer here yet we didn't even put in a bid!

      I'd be fuming if I was him.

      Multiple credible sources state that both the hierarchy of Soton and LFC still have a good relationship...if that is the case and they want to keep it that way don't you think the question of a bid would have been asked in private? and if it was asked and we were told ...sorry just like you right now we can't/won't sell don't even try then why would we even bother when the answer is there already?

      And if the story is true that they will sell only to clubs other than LFC then the case must be that VVD is truly commited to coming here if not then City, Chelsea and all the rest of them would be knocking each other over to put a bid in.

      Yet nothing.
      HScRed1
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 20,172 posts | 4401 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2762: Aug 31, 2017 09:49:55 pm
      Swab
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 13,361 posts | 3462 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2763: Aug 31, 2017 09:52:38 pm
      I'd love to know why Klopp didn't want to go for any other defender.

      I can only surmise that he thinks Gomez can step up if needed, and that VvD is the only player that fits.

      It's a bit of a head scratcher, but unless Klopp explains his position, the above is the only thing I can think of.
      FL Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 31,189 posts | 6346 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2764: Aug 31, 2017 09:57:39 pm
      It's amazing that Liverpool play such a unique style of football that the only CB in the world that can improve upon Lovren plays for Southampton. And luckily for us, Lovren also plays that style of football so at least there's that. That people believe a load like that boggles the mind.
      Son Of A Gun
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 5,187 posts | 1269 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2765: Aug 31, 2017 09:58:38 pm
      Oh well, looks like the end of that saga.

      Every Liverpool fan crying themselves to sleep with this ringing in the background.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oofSnsGkops
      AZPatriot
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 9,944 posts | 1759 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2766: Aug 31, 2017 10:03:08 pm
      It's amazing that Liverpool play such a unique style of football that the only CB in the world that can improve upon Lovren plays for Southampton. And luckily for us, Lovren also plays that style of football so at least there's that. That people believe a load like that boggles the mind.

      Shoot the manager an email, I am sure he would love to hear your opinion and it sounds like he needs some good advice right now.


      GeorgeRed
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,590 posts | 324 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2767: Aug 31, 2017 10:17:56 pm
      I'd love to know why Klopp didn't want to go for any other defender.

      I can only surmise that he thinks Gomez can step up if needed, and that VvD is the only player that fits.

      It's a bit of a head scratcher, but unless Klopp explains his position, the above is the only thing I can think of.

      Baffling to say the least, it was clear that the Saints won't sell him to us after the tapping up scandal. We should have moved for another defender.
      racerx34
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 33,595 posts | 3839 
      • THE SALT IN THE SOUP
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2768: Aug 31, 2017 10:19:09 pm
      People need to stop believing frauds on twitter.
      heimdall
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 13,818 posts | 2724 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2769: Aug 31, 2017 10:45:19 pm
      I was absolutely certain we'd get vvd, as we weren't chasing any other CB. I genuinely don't understand what has happened here but it's a complete F**k up.
      I still think it's been a good window but not enough. Let's hope Coutinho can be reintegrated into the team.
      Benito
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 2,921 posts | 283 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2770: Aug 31, 2017 10:48:52 pm
      Did we even bid? Something very quirky going on here. Same league of dodgyness as Chelski letting Matic go to United.
      AZPatriot
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 9,944 posts | 1759 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2771: Aug 31, 2017 10:51:14 pm
      Virgil is going to find himself living in very interesting times there at St. Mary's.....to be honest feel for him as I don't know what else he could have done.
      7-King Kenny-7
      • Lives on Sesame Street
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 44,014 posts | 5760 
      • You'll Never Walk Alone!
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2772: Aug 31, 2017 10:53:31 pm
      .to be honest feel for him as I don't know what else he could have done.

      Not sign such a big new contract mid season. Did himself no favours there, just like Coutinho.
      crouchinho
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 42,508 posts | 2620 
      • TU TA LOUCO? FILHO DA PUTA!
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2773: Aug 31, 2017 11:05:59 pm
      People need to stop believing frauds on twitter.

      Yep.

      Obvious we were never going to sign him. We fu**ed this one up (or whoever leaked our "tapping up" fu**ed this for us).
      7-King Kenny-7
      • Lives on Sesame Street
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 44,014 posts | 5760 
      • You'll Never Walk Alone!
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2774: Aug 31, 2017 11:09:47 pm
      (or whoever leaked our "tapping up" fu**ed this for us).

      Lovren.
      bazspeedman
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 15,790 posts | 2446 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2775: Aug 31, 2017 11:20:20 pm

      He leaks out almost as well as he leaks in.
      racerx34
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 33,595 posts | 3839 
      • THE SALT IN THE SOUP
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2776: Aug 31, 2017 11:32:04 pm
      Yep.

      Obvious we were never going to sign him. We fu**ed this one up (or whoever leaked our "tapping up" fu**ed this for us).

      Club has been increasingly briefing press/media.
      Even what used to be independent social media have been absorbed lately with the access they have.
      Bit the club hard this summer.
      Magillionare
      • Official LFC Reds Sig Maker. Lives on Sesame Street.
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 14,918 posts | 2381 
      • Hold on a minute, John Wayne hasn't arrived yet.
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2777: Aug 31, 2017 11:49:55 pm
      Why didn't he sign for anyone else?

      Saints sound like they've just done a Coutinho move on us. 'Not for sale'.

      If so... Not much we can do.

      Would love more details.
      FL Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 31,189 posts | 6346 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2778: Aug 31, 2017 11:52:21 pm
      Why didn't he sign for anyone else?

      Saints sound like they've just done a Coutinho move on us. 'Not for sale'.

      If so... Not much we can do.

      Would love more details.

      Why didn't he sign for anyone else? Because no one bid for him because they knew we'd likely outbid them and he'd choose us.

      But alas, we didn't have the guts to actually bid.
      shabbadoo
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 29,420 posts | 4581 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2779: Aug 31, 2017 11:52:41 pm
      Suppose there is January sales...

      Unbelievable business.
      Don77
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 6,527 posts | 1083 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2780: Aug 31, 2017 11:56:08 pm
      What's to say he'll even be interested anymore?

      He did everything he could to force a transfer here yet we didn't even put in a bid!

      I'd be fuming if I was him.

      This ... complete and utter shambles. The club should be embarassed.
      FL Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 31,189 posts | 6346 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2781: Aug 31, 2017 11:58:14 pm
      Suppose there is January sales...

      Unbelievable business.

      Do we know how to buy in January? Couldn't figure it out this past January. Klopp says it costs too much to buy in January anyhow.
      bigvYNWA
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 16,795 posts | 994 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2782: Sep 01, 2017 12:09:30 am
      Virgil is going to find himself living in very interesting times there at St. Mary's.....to be honest feel for him as I don't know what else he could have done.

      I feel for him in the same way I feel for Coutinho.

      As much as I F***ing wanted this lad here, the f**ker is literally trying to do the same as the bloke we're all hating right now. What else he could have done? Not signed a deal until 2022 would be one thing if a year later he was going to be desperate to F**k off to a bigger team. Lets not beat around the bush here. We're all hypocrites if we hate the owners for not getting this deal done while not selling Coutinho at the same time. The fact is if they're not gonna sell for 70m, how much is it gonna take? Honestly need more facts, I'd like to know how much searching around for other options they did, which more than likely will never know.

      There's actually cu*ts about the place saying that we're no better than we were at the start of the window. Like Salah, Robertson and Ox-Chambo are figments of my F***ing imagination I guess. Defence is an issue, a major issue - get it. But F**k, doomsday preppers gotta chill.

      Quick Reply