Total Members Voted: 110
To be honest, even if that doesn’t happen, the fact he would replace Lovren immediately justifies 70mill well spent. Hell, I’d be happy for us to pay someone 70mill to take Lovren!!
Telegraph say City are in talks with Southampton over a £60m deal. Wouldn't be in the least surprising if true...silly money and all that. Not sure I'm THAT concerned because surely to god there has to be a centre back out there worth signing who is comfortably under £60m. Pick the best ten leagues in world, assign one scout to each league and identify centre backs that fit the bill. Virgil Van Dyke cannot be the only one available.
Telegraph say City are in talks with Southampton over a £60m deal. Wouldn't be in the least surprising if true...silly money and all that.
I'd rather bid £60 million on a new goalkeeper
Adam Blackmoore (James Pearce version of Southampton) is saying we are favorites and not Man City to sign VVD.
For 75m I'd expect one of the top 5 centre backs in world football and that he is not.I'll trust Jürgen on this one but my gut instinct is telling me this is absolutely mad.
Fingers crossed. Not sure how reliable the journalist is regarding LFC.https://twitter.com/jwtelegraph/status/946063322654367750
If this is true wonder what happened to City...for sure he was going there...never a doubt about it.