Trending Topics

      Next match: West Ham v LFC [Premier League] Sat 27th Apr @ 12:30 pm - Pre Match Topic
      London Stadium

      Today is the 27th of April and on this date LFC's match record is P29 W13 D5 L11

      LFC Reds Poll

      Q. Are LFC genuinely interested?

      Yes we are ready to go head to head to sign him
      49 (44.1%)
      No, it's PR spin
      62 (55.9%)

      Total Members Voted: 109

      Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)

      Read 263074 times
      0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
      bad boy bubby
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 14,564 posts | 3172 
      • @KaiserQueef
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2438: Aug 29, 2017 09:35:52 am
      I reckon we could have made Baresi look like a bad defender if he was playing in our side so you could be right. ;D

      Joke or not, you're spot on Si: it would be nice to add some backbone but it will take one hell of a player to change the way we defend. 😞

      That's why I haven't been overly phased (one way or the other) by this whole will he, won't he, pish. 😁
      Scotia
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 8,972 posts | 3057 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2439: Aug 29, 2017 10:01:22 am
      I reckon we could have made Baresi look like a bad defender if he was playing in our side so you could be right. ;D

      Joke or not, you're spot on Si: it would be nice to add some backbone but it will take one hell of a player to change the way we defend. 😞

      That's why I haven't been overly phased (one way or the other) by this whole will he, won't he, pish. 😁

      Lot of truth in that boys but as I see it I think his defensive qualities are a bonus rather than the reason Jürgen wants him.

      Like Hummels at Dortmund (but much, much quicker) his ability on the ball will let us move further up the park and press higher - no need for Hendo / Can to get the ball in the D on the penalty area. Midfield moves up and press is even more claustrophobic for opponents.

      We might be more exposed to the ball over the top now and again but with Virgil / Matip / Clyne / Trent / Robbo / Bertie we've got some wheels back there.

      Honestly - for me this is as much about the press and possession control as defending.

      Sad b***ard that I am I had the old whiteboard out showing the boys this last night  😳

      KopiteLuke
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 21,056 posts | 3784 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2440: Aug 29, 2017 12:56:31 pm
      https://www.oddschecker.com/football/football-specials/virgil-van-dijk/club-after-summer-transfer-window

      What's happening that I don't know is happening, because it's happening!!
      Beerbelly
      • Banned
      • *****

      • 6,983 posts | 2054 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2441: Aug 29, 2017 01:23:01 pm
      Lot of truth in that boys but as I see it I think his defensive qualities are a bonus rather than the reason Jürgen wants him.

      Like Hummels at Dortmund (but much, much quicker) his ability on the ball will let us move further up the park and press higher - no need for Hendo / Can to get the ball in the D on the penalty area. Midfield moves up and press is even more claustrophobic for opponents.

      We might be more exposed to the ball over the top now and again but with Virgil / Matip / Clyne / Trent / Robbo / Bertie we've got some wheels back there.

      Honestly - for me this is as much about the press and possession control as defending.

      Sad b***ard that I am I had the old whiteboard out showing the boys this last night  😳

      Good shout.

      I'd also add that the press itself by definition is defending, in that it wins possession back in the final/mid third and prevents the defence coming under as much pressure in our own defensive third.

      Genius really.
      KopiteLuke
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 21,056 posts | 3784 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2442: Aug 29, 2017 01:28:26 pm
      https://twitter.com/AnfieldHQ/status/902505775536492544

      Mad how this was said by a few of us the same day the apology was released. Other clubs being very sly.

      Let's include a clause in the Lemar contract that they must bid, with no intention to buy, for VvD. Shitty tricks going on over there at Southampton, they moan about tapping up but the only thing that can possibly be holding this up now is the leaking, by Southampton, that VvD is interested in only one place.

      Can also only credit VvD for sticking to what he said all along, he could easily play Southampton and suggest "fine I'll sign for Chelsea" just to encourage them to bid, not sure how it would work but I don't think it would take that much persuasion considering how desperate Chelsea seem to be to sign anyone right now.
      PurpleMonkey
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 10,000 posts | 1991 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2443: Aug 29, 2017 01:52:19 pm

      I am confused, I thought there was a medical to be completed today, meaning we already agreed a fee for him? So much bullshit from these supposedly "ITK" wankers.

      KopiteLuke
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 21,056 posts | 3784 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2444: Aug 29, 2017 01:57:35 pm
      I am confused, I thought there was a medical to be completed today, meaning we already agreed a fee for him? So much bullshit from these supposedly "ITK" wankers.



      https://twitter.com/LFCZA/status/902514489123274755

      You were saying?!  :f_tongueincheek:

      Could this be the beginning?
      FL Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 31,318 posts | 6380 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2445: Aug 29, 2017 02:04:40 pm

      Man we are getting desperate :D
      Scotia
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 8,972 posts | 3057 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2446: Aug 29, 2017 02:07:43 pm

      If it's Shane Long in that f***in' car I'll weep like a 46yr old schoolgirl if Gary Barlow ever stops dragging out the lifeless corpses of those Take That cu*ts!
      « Last Edit: Aug 29, 2017 02:21:55 pm by Scotia »
      molbys belly
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,537 posts | 123 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2447: Aug 29, 2017 02:11:01 pm
      What car ? Am not on twatter
      Scotia
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 8,972 posts | 3057 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2448: Aug 29, 2017 02:13:33 pm

      Just click the link in Luke's mail.......
      Kopite78
      • Guest
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2449: Aug 29, 2017 02:13:38 pm

      There is a 1991 Vauxhall nova that picked someone up from the short stay car park who flew in from Bournemouth
      molbys belly
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,537 posts | 123 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2450: Aug 29, 2017 02:16:22 pm
      Jesus ;D
      shabbadoo
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 29,438 posts | 4582 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2451: Aug 29, 2017 02:21:13 pm
      Benito
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 2,925 posts | 283 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2452: Aug 29, 2017 02:23:29 pm
      Its definitely he who shall not be named!

      LondonRed83
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 21,621 posts | 3917 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2453: Aug 29, 2017 02:24:43 pm
      Ha ha this is amazing
      Sir Suarez
      • Forum Emlyn Hughes
      • ****

      • 783 posts | 59 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2454: Aug 29, 2017 02:28:04 pm
      F**k me I bet your Mrs' have great nights out with you bunch of stalkers ;D
      KopiteLuke
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 21,056 posts | 3784 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2455: Aug 29, 2017 02:29:18 pm
      Scotia
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 8,972 posts | 3057 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2456: Aug 29, 2017 02:36:16 pm

      F**k me mate - following that thread made me realise how old I am........

      So is it bogus or not?!  ???
      ConzS
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 4,372 posts | 1029 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2457: Aug 29, 2017 02:38:50 pm
      Hmm can we not just get Sakho back and save 80 mil?
      racerx34
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 33,611 posts | 3844 
      • THE SALT IN THE SOUP
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2458: Aug 29, 2017 02:39:20 pm

      It's an old Merc though.
      Not the new version that Salah arrived in.
      bazspeedman
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 15,809 posts | 2449 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2459: Aug 29, 2017 02:39:24 pm
      Hmm can we not just get Sakho back and save 80 mil?

      No.
      KopiteLuke
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 21,056 posts | 3784 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2460: Aug 29, 2017 02:42:51 pm
      F**k me mate - following that thread made me realise how old I am........

      So is it bogus or not?!  ???

      Honestly mate, I have no idea, but it's exciting isn't it!?!?! :D

      Quick Reply