Trending Topics

      Next match: LFC v Brighton [Premier League] Sun 31st Mar @ 2:00 pm
      Anfield

      Today is the 28th of March and on this date LFC's match record is P26 W11 D3 L12

      LFC Reds Poll

      Q. Are LFC genuinely interested?

      Yes we are ready to go head to head to sign him
      49 (44.1%)
      No, it's PR spin
      62 (55.9%)

      Total Members Voted: 109

      Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)

      Read 260909 times
      0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
      Benito
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 2,918 posts | 281 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2806: Nov 13, 2017 08:22:53 am
      Its inexcusable if the club don't sign a Center Back in January, be it Van Dijk or someone else.
      Breeding-Reds-In-The-434
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,088 posts | 1046 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2807: Nov 14, 2017 07:06:16 pm
      Its inexcusable if the club don't sign a Center Back in January, be it Van Dijk or someone else.

      Agreed, the fact that we only targeted him meant that we thought we only needed one. That doesn't seem to be the case IMO. I think we need 2 capable CBs in January. Klavan can't be our 3rd option and we all know that Lovern can no longer be our 2nd. In all honesty we shouldn't be trying to get someone to play with Matip but rather 2 guys to replace him. CB is a huge need on this club and should be priority #1 in January and the summer.
      7-King Kenny-7
      • Lives on Sesame Street
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 44,014 posts | 5760 
      • You'll Never Walk Alone!
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2808: Nov 14, 2017 10:13:30 pm
      Its inexcusable if the club don't sign a Center Back in January, be it Van Dijk or someone else.

      We've signed 4 players in the last 5/6 Jan windows, one of which was Caulker on loan. Don't hold your breath.
      HScRed1
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 20,172 posts | 4401 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2809: Nov 16, 2017 11:11:03 pm
      RedLFCBlood
      • Guest
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2810: Nov 16, 2017 11:23:07 pm
      Hopefully we'll have the sense to bid then.
      KS67
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 4,475 posts | 463 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2811: Nov 17, 2017 02:37:58 am
      Hopefully we'll have the sense to bid then.

      Bidding? For a player we want?

      What is the is sorcery you speak of?
      bad boy bubby
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 14,564 posts | 3172 
      • @KaiserQueef
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2812: Nov 17, 2017 09:12:11 am
      Bidding? For a player we want?

      What is the is sorcery you speak of?
      😂😂😂

      Ah but... will he be VfM in January?

      "I know a bloke who can, no questions asked, get him cheaper, in the summer." 😉

      🐭
      Scotia
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 8,965 posts | 3047 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2813: Nov 17, 2017 09:21:46 am
      😂😂😂

      Ah but... will he be VfM in January?

      "I know a bloke who can, no questions asked, get him cheaper, in the summer." 😉

      🐭


      The rich manā€™s Steven Caulker
      FATKOPITE10
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 14,342 posts | 3368 
      • Liverpool fc give me tourettes
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2814: Nov 17, 2017 09:32:37 am
      😂😂😂

      Ah but... will he be VfM in January?

      "I know a bloke who can, no questions asked, get him cheaper, in the summer." 😉

      🐭


      Can't we make a bid on black friday ?
      Scotia
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 8,965 posts | 3047 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2815: Nov 17, 2017 10:49:39 am
      Can't we make a bid on black friday ?

      Ooops, think Iā€™ve stumbled into the 1970ā€™s......Iā€™m sure That was a Jim Davidson gag on ā€œThe Comediansā€....... :f_tongueincheek:
      « Last Edit: Nov 17, 2017 11:13:15 am by Scotia »
      FL Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 31,048 posts | 6294 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2816: Nov 17, 2017 12:04:52 pm
      Scotia
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 8,965 posts | 3047 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2817: Nov 17, 2017 12:09:23 pm
      Happiness is a warm gun.....just shoot me now.

      Premature capitulation......

      Man up and suffer through Jan like the rest of us dude!

      PS: from my favourite Beatles album btw
      Norfolk Red
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 1,154 posts | 499 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2818: Nov 17, 2017 01:07:51 pm
      Here we go again, be good to get him but not holding my breath. We will see....................  :mad:
      bad boy bubby
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 14,564 posts | 3172 
      • @KaiserQueef
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2819: Nov 17, 2017 02:46:44 pm

      I'm pretty sure he's the prime minister of Paraguay buddy. 🤔

      Scotia
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 8,965 posts | 3047 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2820: Nov 17, 2017 02:49:28 pm
      I'm pretty sure he's the prime minister of Paraguay buddy. 🤔



      Heā€™s a working class hero.

      Hide your guinea pigs mind.
      Pippen
      • Forum Emlyn Hughes
      • ****

      • 692 posts | 46 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2821: Nov 17, 2017 03:43:18 pm
      Good news though I have to say I'd rather have Lemar. I'm - like Kloppo - a firm believer in the saying: "The best defense is a strong offense". So I'd wait till summer and try Lemar or even Pulisic from Dortmund and hope to make a trade deal with Barca "Coutinho for X plus some hand money". 80 Mio. ā‚¬ for VVD is too steep, dude isn't worth it.

      Because let's face it: The title is gone for us and we should be good enough to make CL with what we have, and if we don't, so what, this is a longterm project anyway. We are one top player away to be a powerhouse that will last at least 5 years.
      heimdall
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 13,818 posts | 2724 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2822: Nov 17, 2017 03:56:27 pm
      Good news though I have to say I'd rather have Lemar. I'm - like Kloppo - a firm believer in the saying: "The best defense is a strong offense". So I'd wait till summer and try Lemar or even Pulisic from Dortmund and hope to make a trade deal with Barca "Coutinho for X plus some hand money". 80 Mio. ā‚¬ for VVD is too steep, dude isn't worth it.

      Because let's face it: The title is gone for us and we should be good enough to make CL with what we have, and if we don't, so what, this is a longterm project anyway. We are one top player away to be a powerhouse that will last at least 5 years.

      I also think the best defence is offense BUT you still need a defence and this lad VVD would greatly improve ours.
      racerx34
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 33,581 posts | 3826 
      • THE SALT IN THE SOUP
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2823: Nov 17, 2017 04:05:51 pm
      I also think the best defence is offense BUT you still need a defence and this lad VVD would greatly improve ours.

      For Klopp to get back to what he wants to play he needs elite players in defence/goals.
      We have none. If the game is going to ultimately ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK,
      then those left to defend need to be absolute monsters.
      Keith Singleton
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 16,662 posts | 2656 
      • Sir Lewis Hamilton
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2824: Nov 17, 2017 04:42:31 pm
      Happiness is a warm gun.....just shoot me now.

      Think he might score tomorrow  :f_whistle: ;D
      Billy1
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 10,638 posts | 1966 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2825: Nov 18, 2017 01:24:49 am

      For Liverpool,well done Keith.
      fields of anny rd
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 17,663 posts | 1961 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2826: Nov 20, 2017 05:08:02 pm
      He was really bad on Saturday!
      Scotia
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 8,965 posts | 3047 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2827: Nov 20, 2017 05:34:02 pm
      Bit of an overstatement.

      I didnā€™t think he had a stormer by any stretch but equally I thought was more to do with how well we played.

      fields of anny rd
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 17,663 posts | 1961 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #2828: Nov 20, 2017 06:35:19 pm
      Bit of an overstatement.

      I didnā€™t think he had a stormer by any stretch but equally I thought was more to do with how well we played.



      Check out the second goal. Quite funny really.

      Quick Reply