VAR

PLEASE show me where I have said the Robbo wasn’t a red card!? Please!!! Not once did I say Robbos was not a red.

This is what you said at the start of the argument, when he was sent off. At no point in the below are earlier decisions referenced to or stated. I've also included the time of it, in case anyone is in any doubt as to what specific decision you're complaining about.

Explain today please lfc across the water… I’m waiting… stick up for this and you deserve a ban for being a wum.

Case closed.

Now onto the rest.

And why are you still not answering the question… if Robbo’s obvious red got a yellow and it was checked by VAR, why did Kane get a yellow for a worse tackle and it was not checked? I know you didn’t answer because you can’t.

I don't have to answer it, because I covered it on the last day both on this thread, and on the match thread. I have nothing new to say about it in the time since.

you personally don’t have a opinion live in running, you takes days/week of listening to media/bullshite before having the bottle to say something.

I don't need the media to tell me what to say, I need evidence. Once I have assessed the evidence, I can have an informed opinion, and then state what it is at a time of my choosing, rather than yours.

You still didn’t show were I said it 

I asked you to explain it, as in why wasn’t Kanes checked when his was as bad, or worse than Robbos?

And you didn’t cover it yesterday, you said he got a yellow so you didn’t expect them to check it, you never said why Robbo didn’t get that same treatment.

I’m so confused as to how you thought that quote of what I said closes that case, that quote of mine you quoted, solidifies my argument against you 

Listen carefully… since the start, I’ve been asking WHY WAS ROBBO’s CHECKED AND KANES NOT? and if you say Kane got a yellow so you didn’t expect it to be reviewed then WHY was Andy’s reviewed after he received a yellow?? Do you not understand that!?

Stop nitpicking what you reply too as well you tool, where is your reply to this?…

Both challenges were f**king awful. Point is pr**k using VAR reviewed Robbo's challenge after being given a yelliw card, why wasn't the same done after the Kane challenge. The whole point being that the tw*ts actually using VAR are incompetent and far too inconsistent in how it's being applied.

Oh yeah you can’t because that’s what we are all asking you and you have no answer for it.

I’m so confused as to how you thought that quote of what I said closes that case, that quote of mine you quoted, solidifies my argument against you 

Listen carefully… since the start, I’ve been asking WHY WAS ROBBO’s CHECKED AND KANES NOT? and if you say Kane got a yellow so you didn’t expect it to be reviewed then WHY was Andy’s reviewed after he received a yellow?? Do you not understand that!?

Don’t you get it yet Kop  Just except he’s a fcuking knob.  Doesn’t support Liverpool and doing a great job of wumming you right up. 

I don't need the media to tell me what to say, I need evidence. Once I have assessed the evidence, I can have an informed opinion, and then state what it is at a time of my choosing, rather than yours.

Agh I get it!! I got it wrong way round didn’t I  So you need the evidence first so you listen to the media and then come on week later to post. How silly of me to think you read the media first and the put your evidence in writing 

Don’t you get it yet Kop  Just except he’s a fcuking knob.  Doesn’t support Liverpool and doing a great job of wumming you right up. 

I know I’m done with him now, had a sleep and calmed down, I’ll just rest easy knowing his life must be F***ing tragic 

I kept checking back last night while watching a movie and he was online in this section from the time of my replies about 11 summat until like 2:30am when I went to sleep just lurking with nothing to say 

Sad c**t.

But yeah, I’m done, I’m sure he’ll reply in a week, half quoting posts to suit his reply, no more replies from me though.

I kept checking back last night while watching a movie and he was online in this section from the time of my replies about 11 summat until like 2:30am when I went to sleep just lurking with nothing to say 

Sad c**t.

But yeah, I’m done, I’m sure he’ll reply in a week, half quoting posts to suit his reply, no more replies from me though.

No c**t can defend them decisions last week , if u try your just purely on a wind up it’s no use trying to reason ,

I’ll just rest easy knowing his life must be tragic

Not at all. If our fans start caving in and  listening to advice from mancs on how to go about their business though, now that would be tragic.

I’m so confused as to how you thought that quote of what I said closes that case, that quote of mine you quoted

You asked for the proof, which was provided for you. So the case is closed. I've covered both incidents in previous posts. After that, there is really nothing else to say about them, that has not already been said.

If you're trying to use what happened as reason to scrap the entire system, that is absolutely impossible. It's expanding into more countries and more competitions all the time, rather than less, because it works.

Not at all. If our fans start caving in and  listening to advice from mancs on how to go about their business though, now that would be tragic.

OUR FANS!!! It would help if you told us who you support before using the word our because it isn’t  Liverpool 

The ref today was awful VAR was even worse, spoilt a good game, no two games are the ruled the same killing football

Not at all. If our fans start caving in and  listening to advice from mancs on how to go about their business though, now that would be tragic.

You asked for the proof, which was provided for you. So the case is closed. I've covered both incidents in previous posts. After that, there is really nothing else to say about them, that has not already been said.

If you're trying to use what happened as reason to scrap the entire system, that is absolutely impossible. It's expanding into more countries and more competitions all the time, rather than less, because it works.

Your last sentence is incorrect, it works sometimes would be a better response.

Your last sentence is incorrect,

Only his last. 

Only his last. 

⁹
 

I know Keith, but whatever I put he would argue about it as you know.
I think he has shares in  VAR. 

⁹
 

I know Keith, but whatever I put he would argue about it as you know.
I think he has shares in  VAR. 

He could have a argument in a empty room mate. 

VAR SMELLS OF CORRUPTION! 

How can it work when you have the same inept fckers in the var room as you see on the field their making the same sh*t decisions, shocking standard tbh

How can it work when you have the same inept fckers in the var room as you see on the field their making the same sh*t decisions, shocking standard tbh

Didn’t you know lfc across the water was on the panel. 

Can understand why both Pens not given thought Ederson got ball until replay. What I can't understand is how one was deemed clear and obvious and one wasn't and if anything the Ederson one should have been the one sent to monitor or even changed

Can understand why both Pens not given thought Ederson got ball until replay. What I can't understand is how one was deemed clear and obvious and one wasn't and if anything the Ederson one should have been the one sent to monitor or even changed

I think they never had or seen that angle, I think it’s BT sports camera angle that caught the Ederson tackle.
They need to some how find a way of using all cameras available on match day.

Didn’t you know lfc across the water was on the panel. 

He/she will already be working on the defense, there will soon be a long drawn out statement as , to why we don’t understand and both decisions correct ,

He/she will already be working on the defense, there will soon be a long drawn out statement as , to why we don’t understand and both decisions correct ,

That's good as I need something to send me to sleep at nights.